The advertisement I've seen lately are all about the AA men.

Re: nice handle. fits the typical stereotype

Thank you PoeWhiteTrash for your insight.

It's a personal preference
I am sure that you have some of your own

Thanks, lovie!
Well said.

cologne on their dick!   LOL

I think every person has the right to choose who they want to be intimate with.  It makes no sense to me to spend money to be with some one who has an issue with one of my traits.  I do however think you can hold an agency to the same standard you would any other company.  If they choose to hire some one who discriminates for what ever reason than it's no different than any other industry.  Each individual can have a valid reason for their actions but it's up to the company to build its brand and staff people that do not discriminate, escorting does not get a waiver in this regard.  In my opinion it's a different case for an independent vs an escort agency.  People that work at McDonald's, Walmart, Papa Johns all of them probably have employees with valid reasons to discriminate.  However as a consumer I have a reasonable expectation not to deal with discrimination when I do business with their staff or better yet that they weed those people out.    I don't understand why people have an issue with this thread, if an agency hires some one who discriminates for what ever reason color, wieght, etc.   I want to know simply because I can deal with the many that don't.

Well said I agree with you.

The male provider's ad would have more qualifications than the TER search criteria

I agree with your first sentence- everyone does have the right to choose who they want to be intimate with. Why would that be applicable only to an indy? Working with an agency should NEVER mean doing something you aren't comfortable with. That's what pimps do.

I never said the Agency should force anyone to do something they don't want to do but you don't need hire any one that discriminates bottom line is the only point I made.  Every one has a right to discriminate at the end of the day for what ever reason they deem worthy it's a personal choice.   However if an agency like any company knowingly hires people that discriminate and tolerates it then it's not ok.  The same way sears, Mcdonads, Citi bank or any other company can't knowingly do this, escort agencies do not have a waiver when it comes to hiring discrimators.  I tend to use the same agencies and part of using an agency for me verses an independent is dealing with a brand, part of that includes not hiring people who have a bias, are racist, addicted to drugs, etc..  I'm willing to pay a premium for this.  Atlanta in my opinion has some of the best independent escorts but I'd rather deal with a company and not a person unless I have a pre existing relationship with the escort.  I don't know any pimps that would turn down an escort based on a bias, that's the standard I'm talking about.  I'd like to think there are agencies out there that will tell an escort she's not a fit because she discriminates and I don't think my logic is flawed with that statement pollyanna maybe but not flawed

Ive had a few girls over the years and that was the reason!!!

You can't logically compare escorting to working at McDonalds or CitiBank. The level of intimacy when interacting with clients is (slightly) different. That is why I referred to your previous statement as "flawed logic". Personal preference in an intimate encounter does not equal discrimination OR racism. Please do not throw the word "racist" around so casually- don't you think it should be reserved for situations where it actually applies?
Additionally, escort agencies (and indies) DO have a waiver to do whatever they damn well please. A free market is a beautiful thing. If you manage to sue an escort or escort agency for refusing you service for any reason, I will take that statement back.

No where did I use the word racist I used the word discriminate based on race which is what is occurring in the scenerio.  I dont think im making any leaps, we are talking about people discrimninating in this thread.  Your free market comment is spot on, A hobbyist may not sue an escort agency I certainly wouldn't but you have review boards, back channels etc. and these things protect us and inform us.    No hobbyist gets intimate with an Agency, you are intimate with the escort.  I use an agency because its easier for me, they find women that fit my needs.  I have expectations things like safety, no drugs, intellect, and one of those should be an environment where I'm not dealing with the topic on this thread.   the agency should do the same for the escort but I don't see how facilitating discrimination accomplishes this.   If you and I disagree on this it's okay but my view is an agency that knowingly staffs any one who discriminates is not an Agency I would choose to spend money with.  Escort agencies sell a premium a high cost product and the customer deserves an environment free of discrimination.   I hope I don't deal with this and I feel like using an agency lowers my odds because I expect them to screen for this kind of stuff.  If I'm wrong it's ok but as your statement proves its a free market and another agency will take my repeat business to the bank, there's no need to sue.   I respect your opinion and the dialog I think we have two different perspectives and that's ok.  I really did enjoy the debate on this topic