This is in response to a new review posted yesterday. A review was posted with scores of 7/7. The reviewer praised the provider in every way, called her "his new ATF" and said she should be a 10/10. He has only 2 reviews- both with praises and the same ratings. Both are praising reviews with low scores. How can this be?  Your thoughts?

Awwww the good ole days now folks are to focus on the numbers and not the juicy details

Looking at your reviews I notice at least 1 that you rated the lady an 8 in appearance, my personal preference would rate her a 5 at best, the performance aspect and the details of the encounter are subjective as well. Some guys don't know how to scrub their balls or their ass and while they may get the full menu, it may not be a full effort by the provider. Also the reviewer in question is new (possibly) and hasn't found his "10" yet.

-- Modified on 11/3/2016 7:35:14 AM

Once in a lifetime?   Seriously?   It's ridiculous to give a 10/10.   Even if it seemed like 'once in a lifetime' at the moment, how do you know?   Unless you die right after the session, you don't know if it was 'once in a lifetime'.

I totally agree with you!!  My confusion lies in that he rated her a 7 7 but in his review he said she was his new ATF and said she was a 10 10 which is not consistent.

that's just not good enough I guess.  As has been said before that used to be a good review.

Could it be once in a lifetime so far?  And.......I think I know a 10 when I see one, don't you?

I realize what your saying, but why so much emphasis on 1 review? She has several pages of higher scores, are you basing your decision to see her on 1 review, from a guy with 2 reviews under his belt? I wouldn't.

If you're mega hot you get a 9 or 10 . If you are a worn out catcher's mit you don't . It's very similar to the side bar scabs who can't make $10 at a strip club so are now suing the clubs . Just because you're the queen of the trailer park doesn't mean you are everywhere else . Just because you THINK he should doesn't mean some dude HAS to tip you on stage or buy a dance .  

I read all the new reviews and this one jumped off the page because of the inconsistencies both with other scores AND HIS rating in the context of the review.  

Maybe he's secretly hoping to deter other guys, in the hopes he can keep her to himself? Maybe they really connected, Crazier things have happened I can imagine.

Could be that the ratings policy docked the score based on what options are available.

Thanks bro

She's a 8, she's a 9, she's a 10, does not make sense to me.    

-- Modified on 11/3/2016 12:35:06 PM

but "round" is a shape I don't find beautiful in a woman and large is a size I don't find beautiful either.

I guess I thought that went without saying.    

posted before when it first showed up as a way to shill .  

Look at new reviews Atlanta Ryan

I would agree that appearance ratings are clearly subjective.  But not so with performance.  Item number eight  on the Submit a Review page we all must agree too, sets certain standards that TER expects us to adhere to in rating a providers performance. It's interesting that a provider is eligible for a score higher than seven if she OFFERS but doesn't actually perform any of the services that could potentially raise her score. On that note, has anyone ever noticed that when you make a change to the parameters under services offered or general appearance nothing changes when the review is published.  They seem to be set in stone.  I once saw a provider whose breasts were described as rock hard in the general appearance section when they clearly were not.

could try out one of the new " safe from speech zones " popping up on college campuses .

Maybe YOU shouldn't ASSUME you have a clue about the OP, or the lady for that matter, both of whom have been around a little longer than a few days.

I would the T ER police allow someone to post 77 scores and in the body of the review give the provider a 10 10?  Or allow that review to be posted at all without clarifying before posting ?

And you're right . This is my first week on this site .  

Some ladies won't see newbies or reviewers with one or two reviews. In the case of this reviewer, he's got one other review and it's a 7/7 as well. I am not knocking the reviewer or the lady - just offering some additional insight to the discussion.

if you read the TER review guidelines (and follow them) there is nothing "LOW" about a 7/7. By Pandering to every provider and just giving high numbers the whole concept of this review board is Diluted and less reliable.  We all want to make the wo,em as happy as they make us but let's be real. How can every time be a Once in a Lifetime experience. I was questioned about this by a provider way back when I first posted a review with a 7 in it. That's why I quit reviewing at all. There is no credibility to the scores anymore. 10/10's are passed out like M&Ms. At this point I think the scoring should be changed to the question of whether or not you would recommend seeing her with a 1-3 scale. The review section section has become more of a bragging board. Just my $.02.

For all the above reasons; subjectivity, unreliability, difference in tastes, expectations, etc.  

"An escort provider is only eligible to earn up to a 7, unless she is willing to perform one or some of the following during a session: Kisses With Tongue, Bare-Back Blow Job, Really Bi, Anal Sex, or More than One Guy."

profile rather than an actual performance reference in the review.  Otherwise the max would be 9 for a review with no anal, mfm or fmf.