I have wondered about something for quite awhile. I reviewed the standards for TER reviews & experience a little confusion when reading them.

With all due respect for my fellow hobbyists, I consistently see reviewers who rate a Companions performance as a 7 (or less) & that turns out to be the highest rating that they give any Companion. The TER guidelines request that a reviewer not give a rating of 7 or higher unless they provider one or more of 5 services. BBBJ, DFK, Anal, "Really Bi", or is willing to service more than one guy. But TER then adds that each of these services should be awarded 1 extra point.  Then I read the review & it includes accounts of at least 2-3 of these services. The reviewer sings loud praises in the review, "Best _____ I've ever had" & then gives the Companion a Performance rating of 6 or 7. So was the Companion's 7 rated performance that included 2-3 of these "Extras" really a 4 or a 5? Are many of TER's reviewers not even aware of these guidelines?

Am I missing something or are they? This simply strikes me as being unfair to both the Companion & those searching the reviews.  Just wondering.

It could be the reviewers are tough scorers. Or it could be whoever the TER moderator is that reviews the reviews bumping the score down for no reason. I’ve had clients tell me that they gave me a 9 in performance (I don’t do anal, so I’m ineligible for a 10), but TER bumped the score down to 8, despite my services meeting the criteria to be eligible for a 9 and the client wanting to give me a 9. 🤷‍♀️

The skater receives one score for technical abilities and another score for artistic presentation, both of which combine into an overall performance score.  

I was told by quite a few reviewers that they tried to give me 10’s but were not allowed because I do not offer “really Bi” or more than 1 guy and I do not offer BBFS/bareback. So I’m assuming you have to provide ALL of the above to receive all 10’s not sure

I have had MANY gent friends tell me they gave me an 8 or 9 in performance and TER knocked it down to a 7 even though DFK & BBBJ was mentioned in the review. Obviously, I do not like this practice at all.  

Although Nuru is a body rub type of appointment. I always include FS GFE in every experience. Also other ladies have told me the same happened to them, so I don't take it personally, but definitely find it unfair.

Thanks for bringing it to light!

Happy hobbying, Ginger

I’ve met a few ladies I’d rate a solid 9 or 10 but couldn’t because of this system. Seems unfair to all.  

Instead, seems like we should be able to rate 1-10 and then add a “+” or “*” or something to indicate those “extra” services being provided.  

So a provider could legit earn a 5+ (e.g. bbbj included, but so-so service) or a 10 (great service, but no extras). And readers would be able to differentiate between the session in general and whether any extras were offered.

I’ve had my concerns as well with the scores because it’s mind boggling. I provide DFK, BBBJ & Anal, but unless the reviewer states everything in the review it won’t count. I have had reviewers tell me they gave me a 10, but TER posted only a 9. It’s very important to us providers who care about their reviews. I’m glad you posted this thread. I hit the like button.  

* I have a 7 score that was from a disabled friend & unfortunately due to his disability a 10 could never happen. I honestly think the scoring system could be better. I provide taboo BDSM services & there’s no bonus points for double fisting.