my TER PM mailbox has received a few messages recently. However, I'm a Basic Member and unable to access and read any of these messages, let alone reply to them.
I just wanted to mention this and not have people think that I was ignoring their PMs.
My apologies.
I've made umpteen announcements on this board that I'm a basic member. Even detailed why. I now have 31 PM's in my mailbox. Go figure
-- Modified on 5/16/2011 12:20:11 PM
You know – I actually tried to keep this civil.
Please clarify - in this and other posts you say you can't get messages and yet earlier today you posted - "I've received so many messages from ladies who appreciate me standing up for them, but refuse to take sides or publickly say thanks for fear against retaliation..."
The only logical explanation is that you mean emails or VM’s. And if that is the case, I assume these are ladies you have seen (or how else would they have your contact info?) We all have our little peculiarities; one of mine is that I hate self-serving contradictions. A couple of things you have posted a while back have stuck with me. No, not going to rehash your claim to have been on this board longer than TER itself has been in existence. Rather, your March 4 post in which you stated, “I don't hobby much anymore, but still enjoy being here and seeing everybody else enjoying. I guess I'm living vicariously through my fellow mates.”
Ok, I guess even someone that doesn’t hobby much anymore might patronize enough ladies that would account for so many messages….but when I was looking back for the date in which stated you did not see very many ladies, I noticed these other contradictions
-------
Feb 26 you posted you saw Taylor of Atlanta – she posted behind you saying that was impossible as she was not seeing anyone at the time you claimed.
--------
Today you posted, “Excuse me if I'm wrong. (You had been called on your previous comment that LE first and foremost targets agencies) I assume LE preys on careless Indy's because they're easy targets...those who don't screen. But I do believe LE spends years attempting to infiltrate agencies like Miami Companions for instance. What a win for LE.
And I do beg your pardwe lithe people participating in this forum are not like-minded. Hence this long drawn out thread. I'm 100% for consenting adults exchanging cash for companionship though.”
But on April 19 you posted, “Yes, true that anyone advertising online is subject to being targeted.”
And on Feb 24, “I for one am glad to see them sticking together rather than working against each other. (referring to agencies) After all, we're all here for the same reason.”
--------
On April 12 you mentioned crossing the line with a lady and I can still sympathize with that,
But in a follow up thread on April 14, you posted “Reality check in progress and I realize I haven’t the means to satisfy all she deserves and requires. Not just financially, but emotionally.”
Adding more multiple contradictions is your post of May 14, “However, I'm sure I don't hobby as much as many in this community do. Age is a factor, not cash flow. Some of you may want to hobby three or four days a week which may very well be the reason you demand lower rates. I hobby once a week, and sometimes just once every other so I'm comfortable paying a larger donation.”
--------
The obvious response is that I have way too much time on my hands to be looking at previous posts. And I have no defense for that response other than my previously stated dislike of self-serving contradictions.
However, in the last two weeks you have exhibited classic troll behavior by baiting and attacking anyone who disagrees with you in a thread and furthering that attack when you aren’t even referenced in a post. If your goal is to disrupt or just get attention, then congratulations – you have succeeded. If your goal is to have your statements come across as believable, IMO, there are just too many contradictions. And that "club" you keep referencing - their suggestion to me was just to ignore you, but I was never very good at following suggestions (unless it was from a lady.)
Wow, not even going to take the time to read your rant. And if you've got nothing better to do than challenge my credibility, pity. Bye now
Please clarify - in this and other posts you say you can't get messages and yet earlier today you posted - "I've received so many messages from ladies who appreciate me standing up for them, but refuse to take sides or publickly say thanks for fear against retaliation..."
The only logical explanation is that you mean emails or VM’s. And if that is the case, I assume these are ladies you have seen (or how else would they have your contact info?) We all have our little peculiarities; one of mine is that I hate self-serving contradictions. A couple of things you have posted a while back have stuck with me. No, not going to rehash your claim to have been on this board longer than TER itself has been in existence. Rather, your March 4 post in which you stated, “I don't hobby much anymore, but still enjoy being here and seeing everybody else enjoying. I guess I'm living vicariously through my fellow mates.”
Ok, I guess even someone that doesn’t hobby much anymore might patronize enough ladies that would account for so many messages….but when I was looking back for the date in which stated you did not see very many ladies, I noticed these other contradictions
-------
Feb 26 you posted you saw Taylor of Atlanta – she posted behind you saying that was impossible as she was not seeing anyone at the time you claimed.
--------
Today you posted, “Excuse me if I'm wrong. (You had been called on your previous comment that LE first and foremost targets agencies) I assume LE preys on careless Indy's because they're easy targets...those who don't screen. But I do believe LE spends years attempting to infiltrate agencies like Miami Companions for instance. What a win for LE.
And I do beg your pardwe lithe people participating in this forum are not like-minded. Hence this long drawn out thread. I'm 100% for consenting adults exchanging cash for companionship though.”
But on April 19 you posted, “Yes, true that anyone advertising online is subject to being targeted.”
And on Feb 24, “I for one am glad to see them sticking together rather than working against each other. (referring to agencies) After all, we're all here for the same reason.”
--------
On April 12 you mentioned crossing the line with a lady and I can still sympathize with that,
But in a follow up thread on April 14, you posted “Reality check in progress and I realize I haven’t the means to satisfy all she deserves and requires. Not just financially, but emotionally.”
Adding more multiple contradictions is your post of May 14, “However, I'm sure I don't hobby as much as many in this community do. Age is a factor, not cash flow. Some of you may want to hobby three or four days a week which may very well be the reason you demand lower rates. I hobby once a week, and sometimes just once every other so I'm comfortable paying a larger donation.”
--------
The obvious response is that I have way too much time on my hands to be looking at previous posts. And I have no defense for that response other than my previously stated dislike of self-serving contradictions.
However, in the last two weeks you have exhibited classic troll behavior by baiting and attacking anyone who disagrees with you in a thread and furthering that attack when you aren’t even referenced in a post. If your goal is to disrupt or just get attention, then congratulations – you have succeeded. If your goal is to have your statements come across as believable, IMO, there are just too many contradictions. And that "club" you keep referencing - their suggestion to me was just to ignore you, but I was never very good at following suggestions (unless it was from a lady.)
Who said celebrity? I said credibility. Might wanna re-read before you and your nose picking butt buddies adjourn your meeting this morning as you compare notes, posts by me, etc.
However, you do make a valid point regarding celebrity. I've always viewed myself a bit celebrity, living the dream, or "fairy tale" as you stated. That means a lot coming
From you. Thank you, thank you very much.
I am worried about you. I mean for a guy that has been around as long as you have, been busted by his wife, currently going to marriage counseling, and with such an obvious command of english, even if he seems to have trouble keeping his story straight - don't you find it somewhat risky to have your email out there with so many ladies?
As for you comments about nose-pickers - that is just a disgusting habit; not sure I would put forth such a fixation as I don't think any lady, regardless of her rate, is going to be particularly enchanted with that. Of course given your obvious vastly greater experience, perhaps you know better. As for butt-buddies and ass clowns - those were and have constantly been your words, not mine. Funny that I have only seen one handle consistently posting behind you, perhaps "he doth protest too much?" If that be the real issue behind the angst, don't worry - TER supposedly is tolerant and supportive for all types of individuals and their proclivities. But in that aspect, we agree - none of my business.
Yes, it is risky having my email out there, however isn't this endeavor/path risky? I find the risk exhilarating.
Gives me a bit of a rush.
As for you comments about nose-pickers - that is just a disgusting habit; not sure I would put forth such a fixation as I don't think any lady, regardless of her rate, is going to be particularly enchanted with that. Of course given your obvious vastly greater experience, perhaps you know better. As for butt-buddies and ass clowns - those were and have constantly been your words, not mine. Funny that I have only seen one handle consistently posting behind you, perhaps "he doth protest too much?" If that be the real issue behind the angst, don't worry - TER supposedly is tolerant and supportive for all types of individuals and their proclivities. But in that aspect, we agree - none of my business.
Aren't you a busy little nose picker.
Ok, not that I need to explain anything to you but yes, many ladies have my phone number and email, not that it's any of your concern.
No, I don't hobby much anymore. Sometimes more frequently than others but on average twice, three times per month, not that it's any of your biz.
Im not getting into the post about Taylor of Atlanta. I didn't realize I wasn't to bring up certain things on this board, and have been requested not to so out of respect for her, fuck you. None of your concern or business either.
While I do not use agencies, and dislike Monica's "she has spoken" and with Jas... Well the obvious, when you assclowns were floating notions of said agency being busted, something amazing happened. They were getting fun,
Flirtatious, and complimenting one another rather than backstabbing. Keeping it fun! Doesn't mean I've changed my mind. I don't like Jas, she's bossy, plays victimized and her arrogance gets under my skin. So fucking what? Can I not make an observation about it being pleasant to watch the panderer's of this board get along?
Finally, I have plenty of cash to spend on my date of choice, but as wonderful as one lady is, I'm not shelling out 13k per month to do it.
I gotta hand it to you though bw, you should have taken your motley crew of nose pickets advice and perhaps gotten laid tonight rather than spend countless hours on such stupid shit. Get a fucking life dude.
Please clarify - in this and other posts you say you can't get messages and yet earlier today you posted - "I've received so many messages from ladies who appreciate me standing up for them, but refuse to take sides or publickly say thanks for fear against retaliation..."
The only logical explanation is that you mean emails or VM’s. And if that is the case, I assume these are ladies you have seen (or how else would they have your contact info?) We all have our little peculiarities; one of mine is that I hate self-serving contradictions. A couple of things you have posted a while back have stuck with me. No, not going to rehash your claim to have been on this board longer than TER itself has been in existence. Rather, your March 4 post in which you stated, “I don't hobby much anymore, but still enjoy being here and seeing everybody else enjoying. I guess I'm living vicariously through my fellow mates.”
Ok, I guess even someone that doesn’t hobby much anymore might patronize enough ladies that would account for so many messages….but when I was looking back for the date in which stated you did not see very many ladies, I noticed these other contradictions
-------
Feb 26 you posted you saw Taylor of Atlanta – she posted behind you saying that was impossible as she was not seeing anyone at the time you claimed.
--------
Today you posted, “Excuse me if I'm wrong. (You had been called on your previous comment that LE first and foremost targets agencies) I assume LE preys on careless Indy's because they're easy targets...those who don't screen. But I do believe LE spends years attempting to infiltrate agencies like Miami Companions for instance. What a win for LE.
And I do beg your pardwe lithe people participating in this forum are not like-minded. Hence this long drawn out thread. I'm 100% for consenting adults exchanging cash for companionship though.”
But on April 19 you posted, “Yes, true that anyone advertising online is subject to being targeted.”
And on Feb 24, “I for one am glad to see them sticking together rather than working against each other. (referring to agencies) After all, we're all here for the same reason.”
--------
On April 12 you mentioned crossing the line with a lady and I can still sympathize with that,
But in a follow up thread on April 14, you posted “Reality check in progress and I realize I haven’t the means to satisfy all she deserves and requires. Not just financially, but emotionally.”
Adding more multiple contradictions is your post of May 14, “However, I'm sure I don't hobby as much as many in this community do. Age is a factor, not cash flow. Some of you may want to hobby three or four days a week which may very well be the reason you demand lower rates. I hobby once a week, and sometimes just once every other so I'm comfortable paying a larger donation.”
--------
The obvious response is that I have way too much time on my hands to be looking at previous posts. And I have no defense for that response other than my previously stated dislike of self-serving contradictions.
However, in the last two weeks you have exhibited classic troll behavior by baiting and attacking anyone who disagrees with you in a thread and furthering that attack when you aren’t even referenced in a post. If your goal is to disrupt or just get attention, then congratulations – you have succeeded. If your goal is to have your statements come across as believable, IMO, there are just too many contradictions. And that "club" you keep referencing - their suggestion to me was just to ignore you, but I was never very good at following suggestions (unless it was from a lady.)
too much time on your hands to be looking at all those previous posts.
And if that's not the case, then you're too obsessive compulsive to be looking at all those previous posts.
Either way, it doesn't bode well for you.
One shouldn't get too worked up or emotional over posts from anonymous individuals on a public message forum. There are more important things in life that are worthy of one's attention.
Please clarify - in this and other posts you say you can't get messages and yet earlier today you posted - "I've received so many messages from ladies who appreciate me standing up for them, but refuse to take sides or publickly say thanks for fear against retaliation..."
The only logical explanation is that you mean emails or VM’s. And if that is the case, I assume these are ladies you have seen (or how else would they have your contact info?) We all have our little peculiarities; one of mine is that I hate self-serving contradictions. A couple of things you have posted a while back have stuck with me. No, not going to rehash your claim to have been on this board longer than TER itself has been in existence. Rather, your March 4 post in which you stated, “I don't hobby much anymore, but still enjoy being here and seeing everybody else enjoying. I guess I'm living vicariously through my fellow mates.”
Ok, I guess even someone that doesn’t hobby much anymore might patronize enough ladies that would account for so many messages….but when I was looking back for the date in which stated you did not see very many ladies, I noticed these other contradictions
-------
Feb 26 you posted you saw Taylor of Atlanta – she posted behind you saying that was impossible as she was not seeing anyone at the time you claimed.
--------
Today you posted, “Excuse me if I'm wrong. (You had been called on your previous comment that LE first and foremost targets agencies) I assume LE preys on careless Indy's because they're easy targets...those who don't screen. But I do believe LE spends years attempting to infiltrate agencies like Miami Companions for instance. What a win for LE.
And I do beg your pardwe lithe people participating in this forum are not like-minded. Hence this long drawn out thread. I'm 100% for consenting adults exchanging cash for companionship though.”
But on April 19 you posted, “Yes, true that anyone advertising online is subject to being targeted.”
And on Feb 24, “I for one am glad to see them sticking together rather than working against each other. (referring to agencies) After all, we're all here for the same reason.”
--------
On April 12 you mentioned crossing the line with a lady and I can still sympathize with that,
But in a follow up thread on April 14, you posted “Reality check in progress and I realize I haven’t the means to satisfy all she deserves and requires. Not just financially, but emotionally.”
Adding more multiple contradictions is your post of May 14, “However, I'm sure I don't hobby as much as many in this community do. Age is a factor, not cash flow. Some of you may want to hobby three or four days a week which may very well be the reason you demand lower rates. I hobby once a week, and sometimes just once every other so I'm comfortable paying a larger donation.”
--------
The obvious response is that I have way too much time on my hands to be looking at previous posts. And I have no defense for that response other than my previously stated dislike of self-serving contradictions.
However, in the last two weeks you have exhibited classic troll behavior by baiting and attacking anyone who disagrees with you in a thread and furthering that attack when you aren’t even referenced in a post. If your goal is to disrupt or just get attention, then congratulations – you have succeeded. If your goal is to have your statements come across as believable, IMO, there are just too many contradictions. And that "club" you keep referencing - their suggestion to me was just to ignore you, but I was never very good at following suggestions (unless it was from a lady.)