Posted By: PheonixRising
But most are easy to spot. One needs to do a little research on the reviewers as well as the ladies.
As for choosing just one way of evaluating whether I want to see a lady or not, that is a mute queston in my opinion. Why would I limit myself when there are so many ways to connect with a lady and see if she might be "the one".
First off I need accurate pics. I am not going to see someone who I am less than attracted too. Who would pay for something you know going in you are not going to be happy with. I agree 100% that there are lots of ladies whose performance might be off the charts who's looks might not be up there, but I am a visual creature. I have walked away because the photos were so misleading.
I also am a voyeur. I like details so reviews provide some stimulation but also provide some insight although these days far less accurate than once upon a time.
Personal connection, whether phone or email, is awesome. I have a couple of ladies who were not on my radar at all but contacted me and through their emails are on my list to see as I can.
Lastly, back channeled info from hobbyists I trust is always valuable but still no guarantee. My 10 may be your 6.
So reality, there are no guarantees. Just like anything else, you plays your cards, you takes your chances!
Good Hunting!
Pheonix
saved me a lot of typing -- sums up my outlook and approach, and I fess up to having a shallow component to me since I do rate the visual physical attraction as the first (though by far not the only) criteria. there are stunning looking women whose looks got them on the radar, and then from reading reviews (as many as practical) I determined that it wouldn't be a great match and did not pursue the appointment. if i find a gal whose personality shines through via email in advance, and I have, then that has helped us to "click" from the get go.