My other thought is that while the provider says they don't see AA men, they're clients are most likely seeing AA women.
Is it just me or does it seems that over the past year the trend of providers in the Atlanta area stating that they do not seeing AA is increasing.
Are we going back in time to the ugliness of the last generations.
I'm each provider may have her own reasons for this, but some of just seems to be a bandwagon effect. Maybe they believe it makes them more "elite"
My other thought is that while the provider says they don't see AA men, they're clients are most likely seeing AA women.
New York, Nevada, California those hobbying states are entirely different from the South.
Furthermore this question has been asked and answered a million times and the only person who could give you the answer you're looking for are the gals who don't see colored gents.
They could give you an explanation if they choose, but they really don't owe you one.. because it's their pussy and they can choose to sell to whomever they see fit... it's really that simple. Guys continuing to bitch about it on the boards makes no sense
I haven't seen very much of that, maybe it is most common in the FS world?
Of the relatively few fbsm providers (including myself), I haven't seen any race requirements, though I have seen weight reqirements.
Most of my clients are middle aged, typically white or asian so it would be strange for me personally to single out black men, I see them so rarely anyway. But of the few I get to spend time with, all have been respectful and pleasant. Luckily, I think I can say that about most of the men that I get to spend time with.
I can imagine that is aggravating though, being singled out over something you have no control over. Sorry 
Are we going back in time to the ugliness of the last generations.
I'm each provider may have her own reasons for this, but some of just seems to be a bandwagon effect. Maybe they believe it makes them more "elite".
It is what it is.
I think this observation being brought up here is no more frequent now then it ever was.
But so what if a certain girl by the psuedo name of (fill in the blank) doesn't spread her legs for you, there are no shortage of "elite" women who will.
Not stirring the pot jut observing and pointing out some of the more humorous illogic in something that seems to occur more frequently in provider advertising.
For some providers it is OK for their hobbyist clients to see AA women providers, but not OK for them to see AA clients.
I'm not a provider so I don't know what they deal with, but I see many AA in the Atlanta area and don't quite understand the resurgence of this phenomenon.
The good part is that like Jimi Hendrix said "if she doesn't, then I know her sister will..."
Not looking for drama just discussion on something related to the hobby.
It's a personal preference
I am sure that you have some of your own
Gentlemen bring this up over and over again.
Just as you get to choose what type of provider you want to see (by age, color of their skin, body type, hair color, services), WE as providers have that same choice. We are not required to see every man that sends in an appt request.
I have a young lady in DC who only sees gents that are body weight appropriate and are half way decent looking (yaa you gotta send a picture of yourself to see her). That is her choice. I have chocolate girls here in Atlanta and in DC who will NOT see AA men. Thats their choice. I have a Cali girl who will not see PorteRican Men. I have ladies here who wont see Asians or Indians. So it's not all about the AA men.
As many ladies are in Atlanta, I am darn sure you can find one that wants or is willing to see you.
Sorry that jus worked my nerve...
Kimberly
The advertisement I've seen lately are all about the AA men.
Are you saying that you do see that?
I said nothing about there being a lack of options.
.... So it's not all about the AA men.
....
Kimberly
Thanks, lovie!
Well said.
I agree with you and I don't see why people get so upset when the topic comes up. All we are asking for is intelligent conversation on the topic. Some of us may not have seen earlier posts of similar topic. It is interesting to me to see people get so up in arms over talking about race. It would be nice to know reasons besides just" I can see who ever I want". I could care less who a person sees, I am more curious as to why they don't see this type or that type.
This one makes me laugh when the ad states no AA under 30. As if other men under 30 are different from AA???? Personally I skip right over these women because I was once an under 30 AA and I have not changed one bit except maybe losing my hair LOL
sounds like you need to do some research cuz this has been a yearly topic.
Why do you choose to see skinny woman? your choice
why do you want a lady with long hair? your choice
It doesn't matter why she does not want to... it's her choice. Just because providers do this "job" doesn't mean we have to see every tom, dick, harry, or you! So you believe because you are paying for our time that we should just put up with whatever walks in the door... ooo you are confused.
Hypothetically speaking suppose a provider did post her reasons for not seeing colored gents or any other gents... do you know how offended some guys would get. Most are overly sensitive already.
You will get responses from reviewers, providers or assistants on the topic who don't discriminate, but i doubt you'll ever see a post by a provider who actually does discriminant giving you a detailed explanation as to why.
I guess you guys figure if you keep crying and bitching about this a provider who discriminates will eventually have a change of heart.
Maybe she has an AA boyfriend that doesn't want her seeing other AA men!
Are we going back in time to the ugliness of the last generations.
I'm each provider may have her own reasons for this, but some of just seems to be a bandwagon effect. Maybe they believe it makes them more "elite".
True. I know there are several reasons why and this is one.
Are we going back in time to the ugliness of the last generations.
I'm each provider may have her own reasons for this, but some of just seems to be a bandwagon effect. Maybe they believe it makes them more "elite".
Ive had a few girls over the years and that was the reason!!!
tyvm,P.T.
I think every person has the right to choose who they want to be intimate with. It makes no sense to me to spend money to be with some one who has an issue with one of my traits. I do however think you can hold an agency to the same standard you would any other company. If they choose to hire some one who discriminates for what ever reason than it's no different than any other industry. Each individual can have a valid reason for their actions but it's up to the company to build its brand and staff people that do not discriminate, escorting does not get a waiver in this regard. In my opinion it's a different case for an independent vs an escort agency. People that work at McDonald's, Walmart, Papa Johns all of them probably have employees with valid reasons to discriminate. However as a consumer I have a reasonable expectation not to deal with discrimination when I do business with their staff or better yet that they weed those people out. I don't understand why people have an issue with this thread, if an agency hires some one who discriminates for what ever reason color, wieght, etc. I want to know simply because I can deal with the many that don't.
I agree with your first sentence- everyone does have the right to choose who they want to be intimate with. Why would that be applicable only to an indy? Working with an agency should NEVER mean doing something you aren't comfortable with. That's what pimps do.
I never said the Agency should force anyone to do something they don't want to do but you don't need hire any one that discriminates bottom line is the only point I made. Every one has a right to discriminate at the end of the day for what ever reason they deem worthy it's a personal choice. However if an agency like any company knowingly hires people that discriminate and tolerates it then it's not ok. The same way sears, Mcdonads, Citi bank or any other company can't knowingly do this, escort agencies do not have a waiver when it comes to hiring discrimators. I tend to use the same agencies and part of using an agency for me verses an independent is dealing with a brand, part of that includes not hiring people who have a bias, are racist, addicted to drugs, etc.. I'm willing to pay a premium for this. Atlanta in my opinion has some of the best independent escorts but I'd rather deal with a company and not a person unless I have a pre existing relationship with the escort. I don't know any pimps that would turn down an escort based on a bias, that's the standard I'm talking about. I'd like to think there are agencies out there that will tell an escort she's not a fit because she discriminates and I don't think my logic is flawed with that statement pollyanna maybe but not flawed
You can't logically compare escorting to working at McDonalds or CitiBank. The level of intimacy when interacting with clients is (slightly) different. That is why I referred to your previous statement as "flawed logic". Personal preference in an intimate encounter does not equal discrimination OR racism. Please do not throw the word "racist" around so casually- don't you think it should be reserved for situations where it actually applies?
Additionally, escort agencies (and indies) DO have a waiver to do whatever they damn well please. A free market is a beautiful thing. If you manage to sue an escort or escort agency for refusing you service for any reason, I will take that statement back.
No where did I use the word racist I used the word discriminate based on race which is what is occurring in the scenerio. I dont think im making any leaps, we are talking about people discrimninating in this thread. Your free market comment is spot on, A hobbyist may not sue an escort agency I certainly wouldn't but you have review boards, back channels etc. and these things protect us and inform us. No hobbyist gets intimate with an Agency, you are intimate with the escort. I use an agency because its easier for me, they find women that fit my needs. I have expectations things like safety, no drugs, intellect, and one of those should be an environment where I'm not dealing with the topic on this thread. the agency should do the same for the escort but I don't see how facilitating discrimination accomplishes this. If you and I disagree on this it's okay but my view is an agency that knowingly staffs any one who discriminates is not an Agency I would choose to spend money with. Escort agencies sell a premium a high cost product and the customer deserves an environment free of discrimination. I hope I don't deal with this and I feel like using an agency lowers my odds because I expect them to screen for this kind of stuff. If I'm wrong it's ok but as your statement proves its a free market and another agency will take my repeat business to the bank, there's no need to sue. I respect your opinion and the dialog I think we have two different perspectives and that's ok. I really did enjoy the debate on this topic
The male provider's ad would have more qualifications than the TER search criteria
Transaction declined
Unfortunately it looks like your attempt to purchase VIP membership has failed due to your card being declined. Good news is that we have several other payment options that you could try.
We thank you for your purchase!
Membership should be activated shortly. You'll receive notification!