Bobbie has 36 review dating back to February 2002.  However, 13 of those have come in a flurry over the past three months, including six in November alone.


A little statistical analysis shows that Bobbie's average ratings from Feb 02 through Jul 04 were:

Appearance=7.2
Performance=7.2

over those 23 reviews, with both categories garnering scores ranging from 6 to 9 (dropping high and low scores from both categories).


Similar analysis for the recent 13 reviews show average ratings from Aug 04 through Nov 04 were:

Appearance=8.5
Performance=8.5

with both categories garnering scores ranging from 7 to 9 (again, dropping the high and low scores from both categories).


Okay, so Bobbie gains significant increases in her rating numbers due to recent improvements in makeup, energy level, and attitude?  Maybe.


More troubling is the fact that of those 13 recent reviews, ten of them were from one-time reviewers.  What about the scores from the three reviewers who have posted multiple reviews?  Well, here they are:

Nov 2004 smilingblueyes   6 - Nice         7 - Hot Time
Oct 2004 kona1492  8 - Really Hot 8 - Went the extra mile
Sep 2004 dynamohum  7 - Attractive 7 - Hot Time


So, that calculates out to average ratings of

Appearance=7.0
Performance=7.3

which falls right in line with her 7.2 historical average in both categories.  Hmmm...


However, when we look at the average ratings of those ten recent one-time reviews, we find some interesting numbers:

Appearance=8.7
Performance=8.8

and something is starting to look REALLY fishy here.


Looking a little deeper, we see one other one-time reviewer in Bobbie's history from a year ago, who awarded her the only 10 she's ever received:

Oct 2003 GNskater        10 - One in a Lifetime  8 - Went the extra mile


Based on her TER reviews that can be trusted, I expect that you will find Bobbie to be attractive and provide a hot time, and occasionally be really hot and go the extra mile.  But don't expect a model to show up, and I seriously doubt that you will ever forget it's a service.


And it should be very interesting to see what IP addresses were used by those 11 one-time reviewers -- planets, tire_popped, Chips)K, ak5102, TheRedLobster, PoohPiglet, hmnash, octbirthday, RunandCoke102, Glenn_in_GA, and GNskater.  None of those usernames have any TER Atlanta message posts, either.


Good catch, 'My View'.


- Gadget



Suspect one-time reviews:

Nov 2004 planets    8 - Really Hot   9 - I forgot it was a service
Nov 2004 tire_popped  9 - Model Material 9 - I forgot it was a service
Nov 2004 ChipsOK  9 - Model Material 8 - Went the extra mile
Nov 2004 ak5102  8 - Really Hot 9 - I forgot it was a service
Nov 2004 TheRedLobster  9 - Model Material 9 - I forgot it was a service
Oct 2004 PoohPiglet  9 - Model Material 9 - I forgot it was a service
Oct 2004 hmnash  8 - Really Hot 9 - I forgot it was a service
Sep 2004 octbirthday    9 - Model Material   9 - I forgot it was a service
Sep 2004 RumandCoke102  9 - Model Material 8 - Went the extra mile
Aug 2004 Glenn_in_Ga  9 - Model Material 9 - I forgot it was a service
Oct 2003 GNskater 10 - One in a Lifetime  8 - Went the extra mile

Multiple reviewers:

Nov 2004 smilingblueyes   6 - Nice         7 - Hot Time
Oct 2004 kona1492  8 - Really Hot 8 - Went the extra mile
Sep 2004 dynamohum  7 - Attractive 7 - Hot Time
Jul 2004 acp6086  8 - Really Hot 9 - I forgot it was a service
Apr 2004 jayatl325  7 - Attractive 6 - Nice Time
Apr 2004 JimmyPW  7 - Attractive 9 - I forgot it was a service
Dec 2003 mo414          6 - Nice         6 - Nice Time
Jun 2003 fossil  6 - Nice         7 - Hot Time
Mar 2003 stingray98racing 9 - Model Material 7 - Hot Time
Mar 2003 cia            7 - Attractive   7 - Hot Time
Feb 2003 Implaying4  7 - Attractive 7 - Hot Time
Jan 2003 AsianAddict77  7 - Attractive 8 - Went the extra mile
Jan 2003 acp6086  7 - Attractive 7 - Hot Time
Jan 2003 DOFL          9 - Model Material 7 - Hot Time
Nov 2002 jackxom  7 - Attractive 7 - Hot Time
Nov 2002 alteregoGA  7 - Attractive 8 - Went the extra mile
Aug 2002 gaflyr  7 - Attractive 7 - Hot Time
Aug 2002 Apollo17  7 - Attractive 6 - Nice Time
Jul 2002 nash          8 - Really Hot 7 - Hot Time
Jul 2002 HardInGA    9 - Model Material   7 - Hot Time
Jul 2002 bangforbuck  2 - Ugly         5 - Average
Apr 2002 young1  6 - Nice         6 - Nice Time
Apr 2002 DocGrayBeard  7 - Attractive 8 - Went the extra mile
Feb 2002 zetorising  7 - Attractive 8 - Went the extra mile
Feb 2002 frankd  7 - Attractive 6 - Nice Time


Bobbie's CityVibe ad photo:

read the one post reviews, you will see many exact and similar statements how it felt

Thank you both! I had put Bobbie on my "favorites" list a week ago based on her recent reviews (and those pictures!). Thanks to your alert eyes and excellent research, I'll take her off my list and fill the spot with someone more authentic. Great job! You both get two peckers up!

Excellent work, Inspector!!  And nice catch, My View.

For the life of me, I don't understand why providers would risk posting fake reviews.  Who do they think they're fooling?  Such tactics actually damage their business in the longer term because eventually these reviews will be exposed.  And potential clients don't want to take the risk of someone who is trying to flim-flam people.

In Bobbie's case, she had good reviews before.  I had actually considered seeing her myself based on the reviews that were legit.  The fake reviews were simply not necessary.  Too bad.

-- Modified on 11/30/2004 5:57:13 AM

service. She is a little older than I thought she'd be, but she will fuck you silly. She is also willing to get kinky. I gave her a 7 when I reviewed her and she was probably closer to an 8 in performance. I think she's pretty reliable--- better than most IMHO.

Hope she's not developed a chemical problem and is desperate for money. Hopefully everything's ok with her.

I don't know...  A year or two ago my friend and I went to PPH (at the time JJ's turning into PPH and we did schedule with two other girls...bait and switch but anyway) and I saw Katie while he saw Bobbie.  She said he was her first since getting implants...so that is closer to two years ago.  But he said she was wild in bed and delivered above and beyond.  Maybe there are suspicious reviews because of the slow "economy" during this season of stings, busts and high LE activity?  Also, like a previous person wrote, she really is much older than the pics.  So that can't help.  But from what I know she still is a good and solid person to see even with the new reviews.  Just my opinion...  On a side note, I would LOVE for the old Brooke from JJ's/PPH's to "visit" Atlanta like she did for the last two years!  Very few people ever said they got her to stop being "cold and professional", but I did.  With her 10 in looks/appearance AND her really liking me I really miss seeing her!  :c)


Your friendly neighborhood,
    WillOrWil