I could claim that my review of Brooklyn is so shabbily worded because my brains were still scrambled from my time with her, but I'd be lying, it was twelve hours after the wonderful rendezvous when I typed up the review and by eight hours later I could see straight again and everything.  So its my bad, not hers.  The reason why the review reads so poorly is that apparently TER has gotten much more efficient of late at posting submitted reviews, and I used to be able to go back the day after submitting a review and proof read and revise, for the reader's benefit, but this one was approved and posted after not much more than 12 hours or so, and by the time I got out of today's meeting and went to do my editing, it was posted.  The content is all there as I intended, the numbers and acronyms are all things I stand by, but the grammar and typos are an embarrassment to my teachers.  And no, I did not go to an Atlanta Public School.

didn't notice typos

I had the benefit of two days before my review of Brooklyn was posted so I could fix my errors.
Aside from this the ONLY ERROR is in NOT seeing this lassie as soon as schedules allow.
Thanks for the great post Logan1_2000.

My first review was approved and posted in less than 8 hours. It's a good thing I did all the proof reading before hitting submit. I would have used your method except for that experience. Since then I make sure it's ready to go the first time. (Note: if you find errors in spelling or grammar in my reviews I have No excuse)