I used to see a girl regular that was bare min gfe 7 performance so damn hit I kept cummin back
She joined a session and it was off the charts.

Looks are important service will follow.  Been lucky I guess

I look at numbers, but the reviews and who wrote them mean more to me for compatibility. The numbers scale used is in everyone's head because it does not coincide with the definitions given.

First I look at the AVERAGE number for each category, then I look at the chronological process.  If there is more than 2 bad reviews from reasonable reviewers, she's out. (I will let one go on the premise of YMMV)  I prefer an average of 15 for $175 or more, for lowers fee's I will take a little lower depending on WHY.  Then the final arbiter is that I will read the reviews and those I like, I read the reviewers history for ladies I have seen and see how they rate them.  That helps eliminate the "White Night" phenomenon.  I rarely if ever see a lady with less than 3 reviews from known reviewers...but then, I have been busted once and that tends to make a guy cautious.  BTW, I may sacrifice on looks ratings, but never on performance.  But then, thats just me.

There are providers who get 9's and 10's that I won't see because their performance, in my opinion, according to the written reviews, isn't what I want and need in a provider.
She may be the most creative, hardcore sex machine in the biz but if she doesn't allow daty or bbbj or dfk, I probably wouldn't go see them. I count more on the written reviews and back channel.
With written reviews, I do research on who the guy sees, how his reviews reflect the same experience as others and if and how long I have known them.

Then I roll the dice!

Pheonix

TER should just subtract 1 from all looks ratings.

Not that these girls aren't pretty but everyone can't be "once in a lifetime" good looking.

I find the performance scores less inflated.

Also, remove all references to "best BBBJ ever".