The lady has a killer body and less than average face or a lady with a movie star face but average body.
What factors more in your choice of "overall looks" when writing a review?
I tend to go with how attracted I am to the lady but am curious as to how others rate.
myskyns

Maybe I'm different, but I tend to rate a lady's looks in part on how much chemistry there is between us--the more chemistry, the more attractive I tend to see her, and vice versa

... and wrote occasional reviews (under another name, years ago), I would kind of "average out" the rating for overall looks (as if the knockout body & plain face had numerical values, in other words) but would be more specific in the text of the review.

Body, for sure.

The face is a bit more elusive to rate than the body, however.

I saw this 51 yo today. Awesome body for her age or really any age and considering she has 3 kids. But her face looked "old" and I just had a hard time with it. To rate her appearance would be tough. I wished her face would've been just a tad more appealing, but her body is awesome.

But what a body on that vieja , ay dios mio.

It's tough to figure sometimes. I rarely write reviews anymore but if I do I don't sweat the numbers so much, just pick one and then try and leave some description in the narrative. One thing I try and remember to do is describe how I compare the ladies looks to the pictures in her add or her website. That way the reader can judge for himself.

I saw a girl about 3 weeks ago.. well a better description would be a woman.. she was a really nice person... was great and I will probably see her again...
When she came to the door of my room I was surprised at how heavy she was... Not BBW really but she had cankles... no end to her calf and no clear ankle.. Then as we talked.. I realized that she was really self conscious about her weight.. said she saw a guy who saw her and said.. I'll take one for the team.. like he was doing her a favor.. she told him to leave... so I haven't reviewed her yet.. she was great.. but I don't want to be dis-honest about her looks and I don't want o hurt her feelings.. she great in every other way.. so that remains a quandary.. Plus I will never walk out on a woman that I have booked with unless she is really disgusting.. but to date and after 30 women or so.. I haven't had to do that.. Most women are really nice people .. and so I always enjoy myself..

so that readers can make an informed decision for themselves.  One TER provider I dated several years ago had a smoking body but no face pics.  Her website said stuff like I can't reveal my face pics due to the nature of my day job but I guarantee you won't be disappointed.  And I read her reviews which all said she looked great and gave her looks a score of mostly 9s.  Then I met her.  Well....  She did have a smoking hot body, but her face was a huge disappointment.  I went through with the date, but her appearance sure wasn't what I had been led to believe, by her own website or by her supposedly honest reviewers.  I gave her a 7 or so on looks and explained why in my review. She was pissed!  But what's the point of us mongers sharing information if it's not accurate?

-- Modified on 12/30/2016 4:47:47 PM

... they're there for a reason.

(overall physical stature, breasts, legs, ass, etc.) and face (eyes, smile, hair, cuteness, etc.).  

Well said!!
I have nothing to add to that😏

I've only met with well reviewed ladies, so I just take the average score and repeat it.

the term Athletic. This term is so ambiguous.What is Athletic can range from Gymnast to Shot put thrower., swimmer, dancer or Linebacker. I just don't like the use of this term

I agree this term athletic is open to interpretation but I take it to mean good tone which is high on my list of attractive features. One of the reasons I like spinners as they are usually tight bodies where's the bigger girls not so much. Above all if the woman does not have a narrow waist to give that pinch in the middle that defines the female body my switch does not go on.
So the body is paramount in my scores-after all,it is about having sex with them whereas I give a lot of slack on the facial appearance. Both are influenced by the lady's manner as well.

I agree that "athletic" encompasses a wide range of body types. But I'd never book with a provider based only on a one -word description--would you?  

I agree....they now have a choice available for "very muscular".  Out of the choices, I feel athletic is the best choice for me, but it doesn't really apply.  While I do workout frequently in the gym, I don't consider myself very "athletic".  Having said that, I am not skinny or thin, I do not have "baby fat" and am not flabby.  I am tight and toned, but not muscular.  I could perhaps be called curvy, but this is not one of the choices.  What other choice is there for a DDD lady with a somewhat toned body and hourglass figure?

I have often wondered this myself.  I compare myself to a few other ladies I know that have similar scores.  A couple of the ladies I have in mind have better bodies (IMHO), but I think I have a cuter face.  Another is somewhat on the heavy side but I find her face and features very attractive!  

I have been an admirer and --as you know-- we have spoken on the phone. You have an extremely attractive/sexy aura.  I can not imagine you are not very attractive in person.  
I find that once I get to know someone, I lose the ability to remember her objectively as I can only remember that way her presence makes me feel.

This is so true Dr. Joe, a few weeks ago I had a threesone with two sisters.  This in itself was hot.  I had previous experience with sister 1 and she raved about how her sister was so pretty.  When sister two arrived I was disappointed as I felt that while she had a prefectly toned, athletic body, her face was rather plain.  I considered sister 1 to be much prettier even though she carried a little excess weight because her face was beautiful.  We had a 2 hour session and as we became acquainted both in conversation and sexually, my opinion on sister two changed markedly and I now see her as pretty.  I guess there is no girl prettier than one looking up at you while eagerly devouring your cock.

We get to read about the sexual exploits of the rich and famous. The newest one is Robert Wagner’s book. Then there’s Wilt Champberlain’s 20,000, and Graham Nash’s 8,000 girl claim on Jimmy Fallon recently. Don’t forget Leo DiCaprio leaving the bar with 16 honeys, and Mickey Mantle getting blown under Yankee Stadium during the game. JFK, Tiger Woods, Arnold Palmer (rip), Magic Johnson, and the list goes on and on. I’ve had a great life, but it always used to bother me that those guys had a better life. Not anymore. Now all those wild stories are about me. All those crazy numbers are mine.  

Can't argue with that mojo!  I share your enjoyment of knowing that I am truly living the life that I had only dreamed about previously.  When I discovered TER I was 55yo and had only had a dozen sex partners, all of them many years previously.  Now I'm 69 and I'm up to around 135.  That works out to be about 7 or 8 new sex partners every year for the past 14 years.  TER rocks, and all the women I've met are angels, whatever they look like!

Sweetman is on the loose! That's awesome. What happens to me is that I develop a euphoric lusty love for atfs. With those connections, I'll see atfs over and over. I've seen atfs 30, 40, 50, and one over a 100 times. With the advent of internet hobbying, sessions skyrocketed. Back during an earlier incantation of website hobbying, one of the guys did just the opposite of me. He never saw a lady twice. His whole mission in life was to see as many different ladies as possible. Every idea is cool. Every age group is cool. All the hard working ladies are gorgeous!

... in this context. They are one-dimensional and may mean something quite different to the reviewer who chooses a number and the reader who tries to interpret it. I give much more weight to what the reviewer says. I can understand why it would be a professional concern for you, but hope you don't take a number personally.

Thanks dude! But I think Wilt the Stilt's record is safe from me, haha. Truthfully though, I too enjoy seeing the same girl over and over when I feel that connection. I've gone as many as 20 or 25 dates, but inevitably they move away or retire well before I'm ready to be finished with them. Your record of 100 dates with the same woman is truly impressive and I doubt I'll ever match it.

Yes, a 100 session lady is extremely unusual. With her, many of the sessions blurred boundaries. A highly exotic lady from another country looking for a husband. I came along, and was one of the possibilities. Of course, I’m not here to find a wife, so we used to have these little tussles of whether or not I needed to pay. I finally had to insist. She married another hobbyist, and retired. 18 months later she was back. The other reason we were able climb above 100 is the fact that her price still is at an old, very low rate. You might call it great grandfathering.  

and - you know the old saying from the guys in the bar - "You can drink em pretty, but you can't drink em thin"!  
Bodies are just important to me - just my thing - but pretty is also good. And as another mentioned here, think about dogie and staring at her great ass the who time. I really like the older ladies - 50+ - with the great bodies, I would have not trouble with that.  

and all he told me when I asked about Wilt - how could you not - he said yes Wilt did have a lot of women over to his house. And to quote him exactly, "A lot of ugly woman"  At supposedly 10,000 and counting, that would have to be the case.

20,000 is of course twice as hard to accomplish, and more than twice as hard to believe.