...squirting is just pee. Oh sure, the hookers here will tell you it's some liquid love concoction of "sugar, spice and everything nice" pouring out of their cooch, but it's all just a magician's trick. It's URINE, plain and simple.
Whatever the fk it is, I don't wanna see it, touch it or...perish the thought...TASTE it. I guess we are now only a few weeks away from TER adding: Poops Herself: Dont Know / Yes / No I can't wait...have you seen the new provider profile categories?
I didn't realize squirting was such a sought after service sub category. From personal experience it is surely one of those YMMV for sure.
...squirting is just pee. Oh sure, the hookers here will tell you it's some liquid love concoction of "sugar, spice and everything nice" pouring out of their cooch, but it's all just a magician's trick. It's URINE, plain and simple.
Whatever the fk it is, I don't wanna see it, touch it or...perish the thought...TASTE it.
I guess we are now only a few weeks away from TER adding:
Poops Herself: Dont Know / Yes / No
I can't wait...
Poops Herself: Dont Know / Yes / No , I love you man.
Ha you feel about "squirt" as I feel about "spooge". I wish I loved the stuff, just can't get into the taste or smell.
But you go right along believing what you want. Just remember what George Costanza told Jerry..
to what clients really want -
for example a provider can and usually does get extra points of she offers "really bi" or "more than one guy" - but does not qualify for extra points for "msog"-
I realize that there are some clients who like the former two (I've enjoyed a hot threesie myself on occasion - but ironically with providers who did not offer "really bi" 
but I would wager that the latter (msog) is more important to most - and providers are eligible for higher scores for offering the first two whether the gent who writes the review receives or uses these services or not -
so now we're adding more service sub categories - okay - how long before "squirts" "allows filming" is worth another basis point on the ratings lol - and still MSOG is not......
I'd like to see some re-adjustment in priorities
They need to sub out "the more than one guy" for "msog". How many guys want or even look for a MMF to have override msog?
it allows some to game the system - they can state "really bi" or "another guy" and get extra basis points toward their performance score on *every review* for merely stating this in their profile knowing full well that a tiny minority of clients are even going to request this.
I think that review performance basis scores should be based on two things:
the services that clients most want
and
the services that are *actually received* by a given client in a particular session
at least that seems reasonable to me and in the interest of both providers and clients....
If suzy screws-alot does everything monger mike wants and he is left gasping for breath and drained, then if he wants to give her a 9, he should be allowed to. Even if all she did was blow him, especially if that's all he wanted.
Is the current way of scoring fair or even reasonable or is it to somehow force ladies into doing more? It makes no sense because a gal could add Greek and really bi, but then have a plethora of excuses to NOT perform Greek, like "oh you dick is too big" or some such excuse.
Never understood this system. She either performs what the guy she is with wants to his satisfaction or not.
how to read reviews and place emphasis more on the content than the score -
what I mean by balance is - there needs to be some reference structure that is somewhat objective that guides the scores
BUT
I completely agree with you that if a client is blown away by a provider that should be rewarded based on *that encounter* - every encounter is different....
I've had providers give all of the services to get a 10 but do so in a lackluster way
and I've recently had one of the top five performances ever from a provider in my experience and could only give her an "8" because of the way the rules are written - but I did note in the text of my review that her review score was limited by TER rules and that if it had been up to me I would have given her a "9.5"
And it is a shame because some guys are numbers oriented and may not put too much credence in your narrative. Ugghh I give up as this subject gives me hives.....lol.
...Keep suggesting. I'm hoping the next "version" of TER improves the review process.
Far less than what is in her other reviews. That a calm but passionate GFE, not PSE that is what I need and want should not reflect poorly on her. And why do some people rate looks poorly when you go in knowing she is not a Caucasian super model but she still is in the top percentage for her heritage. If I can not do an honest review, I just won't. Be safe
...score of a review should be based on what happened in that session that day not what could have happened. Performance is how well she did what she did and a 10 should always be possible.
If we are going to base scores on what guys want, it should actually be "What guys want"
Count me in the camp of guys who don't give a fuck if she is "truly bi" or will fuck the entire football team plus the band. I am one of those guys who cares what she does "with me". Not what she "might" do with others. As for anal, I also disagree about it's importance, but I would gladly retain the extra point for anal if we could get rid of the other two. DFK and BBBJ are no brainers. TER got that part of the equation absolutely right. I can't imagine even considering a woman earning a 10 who doesn't offer those two acts. Although I will confess, I have had some totally off the chart sexual experiences without a blow job of any kind. It's not that the BJ was withheld, we simply did so much fucking that we never got around to the BJ.