For me it's:
"Then she told me to fuck her from behind, and who am I to argue?"
Or the many variations thereof..."she told me she wanted to give me a BBBJ, and who am I to disappoint?"
My god, that phrase is so cliché and I see it over and over again.
Here's another one that drives me nuts "Gentlemen, don't walk, RUN to see her!!"
And finally...the old standard...
"I didn't want to write this review because I wanted to keep her for myself...
Followed very closely by:
"We fell into each others arms like long lost lovers"
Posted By: Phook999
For me it's:
"Then she told me to fuck her from behind, and who am I to argue?"
Or the many variations thereof..."she told me she wanted to give me a BBBJ, and who am I to disappoint?"
My god, that phrase is so cliché and I see it over and over again.
Here's another one that drives me nuts "Gentlemen, don't walk, RUN to see her!!"
And finally...the old standard...
"I didn't want to write this review because I wanted to keep her for myself..."
I think I said "Treat her right, and be rewarded."
Ugh. I should be able to do better than that. 
In my defense.. I had no idea how to word a review..
So I copied that saying..
I should have copied Sword of Vixen Smiting.
Can't remember where I saw that but it was good stuff.
Awww...Do they watch the Hallmark Channel together while in each other's arms?
That is so sweet...
-- Modified on 6/3/2013 3:11:38 PM
But they do watch the Lifetime channel as well
" typical two call system"..no shit charlie brown..
Hit three of them Run don't walk gentleman. And treat her right especially after the review gave a blow by blow description of pounding and cim ( im sure that's what really happened anyway )
The who am I to say no. And also she told me she had to have me now ROFL
...but I was horny, so I went in anyway.
Doesn't really annoy me, but it's just one of those lines I read often 
If that's the case, I hope he didn't pay for a full hour.
I like grown ass men lol Miss K
Which 9 times out of 10 is hogwash.
She came several times. (LOL) In your dreams.
She ignored the envelope. (LOL) Trust me, they have an eagle eye for that
I think those are standard lines in his reviews.
And he get's OTC 
And hookers WK'ing for him.
Oh...I forgot his fave..."And she love's me, and I her"!
Honestly, I haven't read any of his reviews because he simply has no credibility with me.
and honestly, they are not bad. If I were just to look at them in isolation (not juxtaposed against his asinine posts), I wouldn't mind using them for general guidelines (just like I use other reviews)
Nothing compares against our DC mangina - foreroticreview..
really hysterical.
I think maybe she wrote it "with" him...and some assistance from a few others as well LOL
Because she loves him...and he loves her. Who said you can't find true happiness in P4P
Posted By: Panthera12
Honestly, I haven't read any of his reviews because he simply has no credibility with me.
The acronyms take the prize here —and I must report that, sad to say, they have made their way into the spoken language of providers. A few months ago, a provider spoke to me of "DAT-ee," and last night I was offered "a C.B.J." —i.e., that is the term she used— by the lady I was visiting.
And what of the "Language of Love?" Now simply LOL? Oh, I see that's been taken already.
The worst offender: 'In such-and-such agency's stable of girls.'
Runners-up: Long in the tooth, chomping at the bit. A man referring to himself as a stallion or stallion-like in any way.
A more ambiguous one...'And we were off to the races'...I instantly envision a starting gun going off at the steeplechase. Not sure what the writers intend, though.
Can't recall any others, maybe those of you who read reviews more frequently can add some.
and she reached for a "magnum" Why can't guys just write she reached for a cover, like regular size guys write. We get it, you're big.
Posted By: Phook999
For me it's:
"Then she told me to fuck her from behind, and who am I to argue?"
Or the many variations thereof..."she told me she wanted to give me a BBBJ, and who am I to disappoint?"
My god, that phrase is so cliché and I see it over and over again.
Here's another one that drives me nuts "Gentlemen, don't walk, RUN to see her!!"
And finally...the old standard...
"I didn't want to write this review because I wanted to keep her for myself..."
No need to address non-VIPs imo.
Posted By: Phook999
For me it's:
"Then she told me to fuck her from behind, and who am I to argue?"
Or the many variations thereof..."she told me she wanted to give me a BBBJ, and who am I to disappoint?"
My god, that phrase is so cliché and I see it over and over again.
Here's another one that drives me nuts "Gentlemen, don't walk, RUN to see her!!"
And finally...the old standard...
"I didn't want to write this review because I wanted to keep her for myself..."
Not just guilty but I say it every time! No longer. Thanks
I don't see men under 40 years old....idk just doesn't sound right lol
Posted By: Phook999
For me it's:
"Then she told me to fuck her from behind, and who am I to argue?"
Or the many variations thereof..."she told me she wanted to give me a BBBJ, and who am I to disappoint?"
My god, that phrase is so cliché and I see it over and over again.
Here's another one that drives me nuts "Gentlemen, don't walk, RUN to see her!!"
And finally...the old standard...
"I didn't want to write this review because I wanted to keep her for myself..."
no matter what you guys say lol!!
to match the lady that it is written about. Looking thru my own reviews I didn't like my use of YMMV(two times). Give a review as you see it. YMMV is a cop out. At that point your making excuses for her performance or yours.
I never really thought about it but after readińg this I realize how terrible I am at writing reviews!!! I'm guilty as charged on a lot of the most hated lines!! At least I have admitted I have a problem, now I must force myself to go see a new lady so I can write another review and change my cliche ways. It's a sacrifice I must make for the good of community!!
All the reviews sound the same.
Posted By: single47
All the reviews sound the same.
Learn not to be jealous my child. It can cause stress.
-- Modified on 6/4/2013 9:00:25 AM
But I doubt they can afford the hobby -- well, maybe with a PHD in English Literature --
Personally, I've bought into the "details" push more than I wish I had. You know what my favorite reviews say? Very, very little. Flag issues, call out particularly nice aspects of the encounter, and move on. Mine are shorter than most, but could still stand to lose a lot of exposition.
When writing, we're tempted to tell little sex stories starring ourselves. When reading, ALL I want are the facts.
Bromios calls to our attention the idea of reading TER reviews more than one way. He cites the essentials that make up an ideal review —if you will, the good, the bad, and, if need be, the ugly— but he discounts what amounts, if nothing else, to the entertainment value of what he calls the "little sex stories."
That said, like anyone else in this forum, he is free to read and to write what he wishes.
What a welcome reply. PhilAnderz had the rare sense of decorum to use the third person, pointed out something worthwhile, and made me grin. Well done, Sir. May our paths cross often -- our swords, never.
Sometimes it's just a pussy, it need not be "opening like a flower" or "tight like a glove" or "sweet like a peach" or any other corny Penthouse Forum metaphor you drag out of the damp recesses of your adolescent lizard brain. Fewer words is almost always better, IMO.
Reviews serve a useful purpose on both sides of the hobby. Men get a window into what the lady will or won't do, and how accurate her pictures are, etc. Ladies get the satisfaction of knowing that they are appreciated, and perhaps a bump business.
I appreciate men who take the time to write them, and do not feel the need to critique them for literary value.
The only one who slightly offended me was one who really was anxious to see me, but could not afford my rate. I said I would see him for 1/2 hour for a reduced amount, and he posted on my review that I saw him for that amount and never clarified that it was only for 1/2 hour. It was a good review, (for a 30 year old seeing a woman in her 50's) but I resented him cheapening me in that way!
Reviews serve a useful purpose on both sides of the hobby. Men get a window into what the lady will or won't do, and how accurate her pictures are, etc. Ladies get the satisfaction of knowing that they are appreciated, and perhaps a bump business.
I appreciate men who take the time to write them, and do not feel the need to critique them for literary value.
The only one who slightly offended me was one who really was anxious to see me, but could not afford my rate. I said I would see him for 1/2 hour for a reduced amount, and he posted on my review that I saw him for that amount and never clarified that it was only for 1/2 hour. It was a good review, (for a 30 year old seeing a woman in her 50's) but I resented him cheapening me in that way!
Who actually writes these reviews? They all sound the same but names changed. Are they even real? Sound fake.
Certainly not to contribute anything intelligent to the conversation. Now stop using your Mom's computer to play on the Internet and go back to doing your homework. Otherwise you will flunk that algebra quiz.
He has nothing else to do, and no one will talk to him for free. It's pretty obvious this troll is just that.
