TER General Board

ATLHunter's quip "Jerkoffs whining about rates & weights" got me thinkingconfused_smile
Hags,Bags,and-On-the-Rags 628 reads
posted

It's a damn good thing  providers don't charge by the pound !!!

Some would need a freight scale, and most would file for bankruptcy!

fucktard_repellent434 reads

Because you'd need to pack on 25 lbs just to make a buck.  BTW, I'm no longer anorexic.  :(

Not that anorexic is a good thing. But you looked good man!

Whale_Harpoon292 reads

I went to one of my favorite Chinese restaurants,  had a fantastic meal and paid $5.99 per pound.
My total bill was $9.55. How much did I eat?

At first, I thought the OP meant that providers should charge hobbyists by how much the hobbyist weighs. (Some stores charge more for XX+L clothing than the same item in S-M-L-XL.)

Then, there was a reply to Tasha Vegas that sounded like some people thought OP meant hobbyists should have to pay according to how much the provider weighs. (I'm for that! The lower the better!)

So even though I'm confused by what was intended I think, to be fair, you should really use BMI (body mass index) instead of weight when determining rates.

fucktard_repellent235 reads

For once, I'm normal.

Provider or hobbyst?

Am sure some providers would like to charge by the hobbyst's weight!

Register Now!