Write Review
2,078,299 Total Reviews 3,772 New Reviews
9,308 Users Online

Transsexual

Suggestions Approved!!!
TS Tempted 1470 reads
posted

According to one of the more knowledgable and reliable powers-that-be at TER our suggestions have been approved in record setting time.  Apparently the wheels are already in motion to add the additional fields to TS reviews.  Stay tuned all.

Now all we have to do is get more members to write more TS reviews…

Thanks for everyone’s support on this issue.

Take care,


TS Tempted


-- Modified on 12/18/2007 6:12:31 PM

TS Tempted1914 reads

The standard TER review form does not prompt for certain information specific to TS providers.  As a result, a lot of important information on TS providers goes missing from most TER TS reviews.  Some reviewers are better than others at remembering to include some of this information in the written portion of their reviews but if the review form could be modified to specifically prompt for the following items TS reviews would become much more useful to the members of TER:

Functionality:  rock hard, semi-erect, flaccid
Versatility:  top, bottom, versatile, don’t know
Cock size (when erect):  5 or less, 5-6, 7-8, 9-10, 10+
Circumcised:  yes, no
Ejaculates:  yes, no, did not request


These items could be added to the existing review form in the section “Provider’s Appearance” under the last item “Transsexual” which has menu choices of “[blank]”, “no”, “yes.preOp”, “yes.postOp”.  Alternatively a specific review form just for TS reviews could also be developed which would keep any confusing from arising with only one form.  

BTW these should all become searchable items as well.  In addition it would be very helpful to be able to search TS PROFILES ONLY for most reviewed providers and by the most prolific reviewers (top 50 in each category is probably plenty).

We sincerely hope that TER will give serious consideration to these suggestions as they would significantly enhance the usefulness of TS reviews and profiles.   This should make TER the most comprehensive place, by far, for TS reviews by as most other TS review boards are also deficient in obtaining this information on a consistent basis from their TS reviewers.

Regards,


TS Tempted

ReplyQuoteReport
TS Tempted1882 reads

The following message has been posted in the Suggestion & Policy forum:

TER Review Form Missing Important TS Data - Posted by TS Tempted, 12/18/2007
http://www.theeroticreview.com/discussion_boards/viewMsg.asp?BoardID=4&Page=1&Messageid=3926&FromEdit=1


This message links them to the post just above this one - “Suggestions for the TER Review Form – An Open Message to TER Admin”.   I have also emailed admin with a link to this thread as well.  

Rather than clutter up the S&P forum, what I’d like for you all to do is post a reply to this thread endorsing these changes as well, sort of a ‘virtual petition’ if you will.  Don’t know if it will do any good but it never hurts to ask.  

Thanks to everyone in advance.

Regards,


TS Tempted


-- Modified on 12/18/2007 3:24:08 PM

ReplyQuoteReport
TSMissJasmine1172 reads

... search and review information. Keep up the good work!

ReplyQuoteReport
removeme851534 reads

For what its worth, I think these are excellent suggestions and I hope they will be implemented.

ReplyQuoteReport
Tres_huecos1261 reads

How about another one for:

Turns off cell phone during session??

ReplyQuoteReport
Vegas1311329 reads

ReplyQuoteReport
TS Tempted1471 reads

According to one of the more knowledgable and reliable powers-that-be at TER our suggestions have been approved in record setting time.  Apparently the wheels are already in motion to add the additional fields to TS reviews.  Stay tuned all.

Now all we have to do is get more members to write more TS reviews…

Thanks for everyone’s support on this issue.

Take care,


TS Tempted


-- Modified on 12/18/2007 6:12:31 PM

ReplyQuoteReport
twukdriver1859 reads

I'd love to write a TS review...If I could find one that can still squirt and doesn't get all pushy and stuff. :)

ReplyQuoteReport
Nikki_Greedy1510 reads

I resemble that remark... :)
This is very good news.. I was wondering if there was some specifics in the review....

ReplyQuoteReport
mrsoze739 reads

Does this filter work for anyone?...it just seems to return all the results not filtered for coock size at all...

ReplyQuoteReport
JustATransGirl1469 reads

Hobbyists should also be required to post stats when posting reviews too doncha think?

Giggle...

Functionality:  rock hard, semi-erect, flaccid

Versatility:  top, bottom, versatile, don’t know

Cock size (when erect):  2" or less..., 5-6, 7-8, 9-10, 10+(freebie)

Circumcised:  yes, no

Ejaculates:  yes, no, was unable to even with viagra...

and add...

Bathed:  yes, no, never

Giggle,
TS Jamie :-)

Related Link: http://www.justatransgirl.com

ReplyQuoteReport
Nikki_Greedy971 reads

I would hope for an honest review, good or bad.. That is the only way one can tune their services, honest feedback..
If I am doing something or not doing something I most definitely would like to know.. SO far I have NO complaints, Not many reviews on that note either, just a couple at one of my sites.. Um Guess I should link those on my other sites too.. Good idea!!

ReplyQuoteReport
Cum il faut1390 reads

ReplyQuoteReport
vwjetta1166 reads

Two rock hard thumbs up!

ReplyQuoteReport
Post Reply Back To Forum
Register Now!