that when you provide links to information that form the basis of your argument that it doesn't turn a baseless accusation into a fact or prove one's point? Seems to me you admitted on one of his recent rants about a low scored girl, that the link to the review didn't prove the review was fake.
But since I have no reviews associated with this handle and you can't pm me so I can explain what I just said, as if if needs explaining, then it means what I just said is useless or untrue. But wait, you can strike the part about no reviews associated with the handle being a requirement for legitimacy since it's apparently not revelvant to you in at least one case. That case of course being the guy who has no reviews to his name, but like to spend their time combing (stalking?) through guy's reviews so they can try and throw something in their face on the discussion board and use is as the basis for an allegation they have no way of proving.