It is totally up too them. I've only done one recently and it was a.
I think it should be b because not only do many build the room charge into the first hour but they truly do slightly "less work" in a duo, IMO.
c is ridiculous. 2-1 is most often going to be less work so why should they charge more? For me it was actually more intimidating and awkward than 1-1 is so I'm not a huge fan considering bang-for-the-buck.LOL
When booking a duo with asp's is the hourly donation typically:
a)the sum of the individual asp's hourly donation
b)less than the sum of the individual asp's hourly donation (one room)
c) more than the sum of the individual asp's hourly donation (three vs two)
I have seen it posted all three ways and would like to know if there is a preferred practice or is it however the asp's want to do.
Thanks,
What's the difference? All that really matters is what the duo you want to see is charging. As most lady's ads say, it is "non-negotiable".
It is totally up too them. I've only done one recently and it was a.
I think it should be b because not only do many build the room charge into the first hour but they truly do slightly "less work" in a duo, IMO.
c is ridiculous. 2-1 is most often going to be less work so why should they charge more? For me it was actually more intimidating and awkward than 1-1 is so I'm not a huge fan considering bang-for-the-buck.LOL
I don't think it should be judged by "less work" as you imply, because they are still there for an hour no matter how many physical cups occur or how many minutes each girl spends servicing you. In fact, I don't know that it would be less work, as you would be trying to service both the guy and the other gal and make sure everyone is involved and enjoying themselves. The hour is the same, and each girl could spend that hour individually making her hourly rate, so why not make it in a duo? I've never worked doubles and don't mean to be combative, I just disagree with your logic, that "they're doing slightly less 'work' so they should get a lower rate." I suppose if there is a room charge or something that could be deducted or split, but other than that I see no reason why it should be significantly less than the sum of their rates. Of course, I don't think it should be more, that is just silly, but indeed the sum of their rates is fair and reasonable, or slightly less in the case of room charges added to original rates.
XoXo,
Marea