It doesn't have be literal, although that is a good example.
You make up stuff. When people complained about children being accidently killed they were not called American haters for that per se. It was when they said things like the U.S. was doing it on purpose and the U.S. was the same as Sadam who had rape rooms and ground people aliveThis is what it actually is. Eventually religious fanaticism leads to religious terrorism.
I still wonder why the UN has not expelled Israel out of the world body. It is the best time now that President Obama is in office. The Zionist theocratic country should be isolated from the rest of the world.
There are bad people in every group,l nationality, religion, race, proffession, whatever
What is important is how the rest of the group reacts to the bad apple.
Here a bad Jew acts terribly, and there are protests against him. When those three isreali punks killed the Palestinian boy, they were arrested and all the major rabbis and groups in Isreal demanded that they be given life in prison or even the death penalty.
Now compare that to when Palestinians kill Jews (or attack others), There is dancing in the street and candy is passed out ot kids. Squares are named after them and when they come home they are hailed as heros.
One group prosecutes its bad people and condemn them. The other praises them and dances in the street when they kill.
There are bad individuals in all groups. But one group supports its bad actors and one condemns them.
Which group is better?