Veronica is a gorgeous former Victoria's Secret Model. She is tall and eager. She is half Caucasian and half Latin but her hot blood is all Latin.
Recommended: Yes!
Rating: 10/8
GFE: Yes
Services: Some DFK but more LFK, BBBJ, DATY. CFS, (Did not aske about Greek, or CIM and too spent for MSOG-- YMMV)
Rates: $350/60 mins
Incall: Yes, Tysons
Outcall: Yes
Beautiful girl, very personable, all natural. Full review to follow soon.
Photos: accurate but blurred.
Why is she worth more than others. I don't get off on catalog girls that are 50$ more. Not worth the extra. I want enjoyment not pictures.
The last two new ladies from DMV listing at 350. Is this a new normal going rate for dc now?these ladies have no reviews ?
Ask the agency! Maybe thats what the girls want to charge OR maybe they travel far so its most cost effective OR maybe they are in such high demand that the agency can charge a little more.
What ever the case, you're not gonna find the answer here...just a bunch of guesses Lol
It's not unprecedented for an agency to have a gal or two who are at a higher price point. Several ladies have come through with one or more of the DC agencies and had a higher than "standard" rate than the other ladies at that agency. Most have never made a return trip. Perhaps because they didn't have the number of takers that they anticipated. But on the other hand you have (or had) Maegan from ClassyDC. She was $100 above the going rate and her dance card was always full. The market will decide.
True... Maegan had been in Playboy and if I remember correctly her rate actually went up at least once as demand rose. One poster commented he wouldn't pay an extra $50 for pictures but it's all YMMV and what you like. Classy and the other agencies have plenty of girls available at 300. A few charging higher shouldn't upset the market...
I don't agree with this review whatsover. Just finished seeing her and she is a 5-6 in the looks department. Should be charging $150/hr not $350. Performance is solid though. I don't recommend and I stake my reputation on this. Remove my profile if others support the contrary.
It is a free country and opinions are welcomed. If you do not like her, do not see her. Chill out. This is not rocket science. You have choices. My opinion is only a data point. If we all agreed, it would be a boring place.
I appreciate having different opinions shared in the same thread and then we can make our own decision. And personally, I find myself usually in agreement with nlackew.
Thanks to you both for toftt.
whether the pix are an accurate representation. Reasonable people can disagree on whether the pictures depict a 5 or a 9. The key is whether they are accurate
True... looking at the pics I don't see a 9 (even with the blurring). I believe she used to be in the VS catalogue, and I believe she used to be a 9. The reviewer's got a lot of expereince, but it seems he tends to use 8-10 for his looks scores. Maybe true in his book, but I'm going to assume his scores on looks are a tad overinflated.
On the other hand Nick seems to have scored her low because he felt he got burned. Most of us going in with this girl would probably give her a 7 or 8.
As noted before, thanks to both of them for TOFFT.
It's big gap between 9 rating vs 5 rating?
Why did you fail to mention the strech marks on her stomach, ass and breasts??? And you think this is deemed a 10. 10 is defined as perfect. You think these blemishes should be overlooked?? I work hard for my money. And these girls do too. Even more so when they 'have' to be with guy who they find repulsive. It's only fair that only the best / most attractive girls should get our business - it works out for all parties involved. However, when an unattractive girl gets our business, no one wins except the agency. The monger ends up having a shitty time and the money he could have given to a better looking gilr gets wasted. Be intelligent about things. Again, anyone who sides with you, please speak up. And don't tell me to chill out. I speak the truth and don't hide behind an alias. That's why i'm constantly bombarded by emails.