Politics and Religion

Hey, my relationship with your mother is none of your business (eom)teeth_smile
Snowman39 417 reads
posted

Posted By: Laffy
He probably got his "facts" from Faux.

Snowman392565 reads

Investors dumping out of the market and selling off assets. This is what we call taking money OUT of the economy...

And guess what, I don't give Obama credit for that, either.  But you want to blame him for everything, partisan hack that you are.  Even your story about year-end selling is more about fiscal cliff issues, which are at least as much the fault of Republi-Tards.
Bottom line, snowball, you are a relentless, partisan dumbass with zero credibility.  You should stay on the golf course with your fellow whiners.
(and, yes, I know you didn't mention O's name in your post but it's obvious who your finger's pointing at, as it always does.)

Snowman39468 reads

It was at about 13,600 in October, AFTER the rise it is still only at 12,,800. Still WAY DOWN.

Gee, what political events have happened between now and then that could cause that?

OH YEAH, I do give Obama credit for this big sell-off.

as one of the biggest fools on this board and that's quite an accomplishment.  And you clearly have no clue about how the market works yourself.  In fact, any stock market pro will tell you the market is not down because of Obama but because of weakness in the European and Chinese economies, especially Greece and Spain, and because of fears about the fiscal cliff, something we can thank Congress (mainly RepubliTards) for.
But you, the Arch Tool of this board, will blame Obama for anything and everything.  Watch, as snowball blames him for the Greek economy and Global Warming.  Ooops!  I forgot!  Tools like snowball don't think that exists! LMAO!

Snowman39480 reads

everyone has one...

Yes, there are analysts who will blame the weaknesses in other economies, there are others who will blame  the pending collapse of Europe because of their debt load.

There is ONE CONSISTENT FACTOR, EVERYONE agrees that taking money out of the economy hurts it, and the article I pointed to cites just that.

You know, I am pretty sure there is a Jr. College close by where you could enroll in an ECON 101 class. You should REALLY consider it.

In fact, he IS one!  Now, listen up you 'tard: of course taking money out of the economy hurts it. And who wants to take money out of the economy?  Why, the RepubliTards with their huge spending cuts and their refusal to bend (yet) on the revenue side.  Watch them cave, between now and Jan. 1.  They know they're riding a loser.  But you have yet to figure that out.  As for Jr. College, I'm sure you'll be able to get in once you finish that GED.  Don't worry snowy, the Short Bus will be here soon to take you to class.

Snowman39502 reads

If you keep tax rates low so that money instead can be spent by individuals. Why do liberals think that spending money by he government is good, but by individuals is bad.

Oh yeah, then they don't get their freebies, they have to actually work to get the money.

Don't you hate it when the real world KICKS THE SHIT OUT OF YOUR LIBERAL IDEOLOGY!!!!

-- Modified on 11/20/2012 10:02:03 PM

You keep pushing ideas that have been proven not to work.  You have drunk the Kool-Ade (or, in your case the Kook-Ade) for so long you can't tell fiction from reality.  Don't you hate it when this board KICKS THE SHIT OUT OF YOUR LAME-ASSED POSTS!!!!!  Oh, well, you can't fix stupid.  
Snowball = BTONTP&RB + TSTTT.

Snowman39492 reads

We have had Obama for 4 years, and the unemployment rate still extremely high.

I am trying to find a country that really practices conservative principals and free markets, but can not find one.

I can find a TON of them who have tried the liberal road map. They are scattered all over Europe and are now enhancing their vocabularies with words like Austerity as their citizens riot in the streets.

You see, there are real world examples of your way, and they all end the same,everyone broke and crying for their handout that there is no more money for  

-- Modified on 11/22/2012 5:35:03 AM

Sad true.  If it worked, Bush's tax cut on the top rate, low cap gains rate and dividend rate should have had the economy booming.  And you're the one whining about the economy.  Can't wait for your next lame excuse.

Snowman39479 reads

Thanks for passing on the name calling...,

I can see why you would say they, but I would point out the number one asset in the world back securities, home values, caused the huge economic crash.  

Also, I blame it on BOTH Wall Street and he government.  Wall Street was moving loans and making a shit load of money. The Fed was at the same time pushing banks to make loans to people who could normally not get the, so they could be part of the American dream.  Everyone serving their own interests by either getting money or trying to garner favor for votes.

I guess this is where we differ on some basics, I expect Wall Street to maximize profits. I expect the government to practice good oversight. Wall Street did what I would expect, the government did not.  

The Dems wanted everyone to have a home, even if they couldn't afford one. the Reps gutted the SEC and other oversight agencies tasked with keeping the banks from running amok with their liars' loans, the ratings agencies were in the pockets of the banks and gave AAA ratings to junk, Clinton and Bush administrations looked the other way.  And on an on, until we had an epic collapse that started in 2008 under Bush and continued during the first few months of the Obama administration.  And, while the stimulus plan was far from perfect, statistics show the country began to recover -- albeit too slowly -- once it went into effect.  The Republicans are in denial about this, just as they have tried to foil everything Obama has tried.  My opinion is they put party politics before country, and cared more that Obama fail than that the country succeed.  Patriotism be damned.
Republicans=partisan obstructionists=rejected by the voters.

Register Now!