Suggestion and Policy

Don't forget ass-to-mouth... eomred_smile
PerkyDs 145 reads
posted


END OF MESSAGE

Although I don't recall seeing it recently, I know it's already been suggested: a separate field for Facial/COF?    
Response options could be: Yes, No, YMMV.    

Right now, it's only an alternative to CIM; but quite a few providers who enjoy CIM also like Facials. ;-)

 
I'd also love to see a field for Touch Anus (I know, I know, "anus" sounds clinical but if it's "Touch Asshole" people might think my ex-hubby will be present lmao).
Options could be the same as Touch Pussy, but personally I think YMMV should be there too.  

Some people think that if a lady allows FIV, then doing the same in "the other hole" is also on the menu.  Or perhaps her reviewers weren't clear about what exact activities happened and simply write that she allowed them to play with her ass.  

Such phrasing could easily be interpreted as internal action (fingering or finger-fucking) when she actually only allows touching on the OUTSIDE and/or rimming.  ;-)

 
Adding COF is more important, in my opinion though, because I get asked about this far more frequently.  And I'm certain plenty of hobbyists search for that specific activity!  The way things are now, there are many ladies who won't turn up in results simply because they DO allow CIM.   :-)

-- Modified on 1/14/2017 8:29:10 AM

I am a big fan of COF, and have been lucky to find several gals who are also.  A few of them I turned on to the practice, and now love it.

As for the anus, I think something like "anal play", would be a good descriptor, but it should also note receive or give, as some do one or the other, or both.

Maybe we could have a category for having the gal's ex present also.  You never know in this business

See this recent thread on In Search Of:

Posted: 12/21/2016 at 11:59:57 PM
Posted by: res8899
Subject: ISO providers that enjoy COF
http://www.theeroticreview.com/discussion_boards/viewall.asp?MessageID=54316&boardID=14#54316

(I hope you like my suggestions, therein.)

I think that the next release of the review / profile form changes will include "check all that apply" for the CIM field. It could probably use a greater revamp than just that, but it's a step in the right direction.  

Toys! Don't forget toys!  

Subject: Toys
Posted: 3/20/2016 at 9:45:03 PM
http://www.theeroticreview.com/discussion_boards/viewall.asp?BoardID=4&SortBy=DateCreated%20desc&Search=toys&SearchType=1&Author=impposter&DayFrom=333&DayTo=0&MessageID=13720&frmSearch=1#13720

Posted By: Debra_Hollander
Although I don't recall seeing it recently, I know it's already been suggested: a separate field for Facial/COF?    
 Response options could be: Yes, No, YMMV.    
   
 Right now, it's only an alternative to CIM; but quite a few providers who enjoy CIM also like Facials. ;-)  
   
   
 I'd also love to see a field for Touch Anus (I know, I know, "anus" sounds clinical but if it's "Touch Asshole" people might think my ex-hubby will be present lmao).  
 Options could be the same as Touch Pussy, but personally I think YMMV should be there too.    
   
 Some people think that if a lady allows FIV, then doing the same in "the other hole" is also on the menu.  Or perhaps her reviewers weren't clear about what exact activities happened and simply write that she allowed them to play with her ass.    
   
 Such phrasing could easily be interpreted as internal action (fingering or finger-fucking) when she actually only allows touching on the OUTSIDE and/or rimming.  ;-)  
   
   
 Adding COF is more important, in my opinion though, because I get asked about this far more frequently.  And I'm certain plenty of hobbyists search for that specific activity!  The way things are now, there are many ladies who won't turn up in results simply because they DO allow CIM.   :-)

-- Modified on 1/14/2017 8:29:10 AM



-- Modified on 1/14/2017 11:28:30 AM

Register Now!