I want to know what SOME of ya'll think about this......(Talula admits she may be WRONG )

Only of the people's oppinions I care about, so eddie, your ''expertise'' is not needed here..LOL
Please look into this be4 getting back to me with what you think this means..Their are PLENTY of ''lefty's'' on this board whos oppinions I respect, willy, poopa (thats my pet name for you) lol- and of course''my friend'' Marikod, I just ask you start researching with an open mind, AND YES I COPY AND PASTED THE PART IN QUOTATIONS..Notice the date and The name of the treaty "CONVENTION ON THE PROHIBITION OF MILITARY OR ANY OTHER HOSTILE USE OF ENVIRONMENTAL MODIFICATION TECHNIQUES APPROVED BY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF THE UNITED NATIONS ON 10 DECEMBER 1976"......
-------------------------------------------------


''This title alone tells us conclusively that scientists of at least several nations who have a history of being hostile to one another now possess scientific knowledge that can control damaging weather to the point of being able to use such weather as hostile, destructive weapons. Exactly which countries possess this damaging capability is not clear; however, we know that, in this 20th Century, Western Capitalism has been nose-to-nose with Eastern Russian Communism. Therefore, we can only conclude that both Russia and America possess this technology.


What kind of damaging weather might be useful as military weapons? I think the following list might be possible candidates.
1. Earthquakes -- This phenomenon might be the most terrifying, since people cannot live without foundation. Entire city structures are based upon buildings having dependable foundations. Therefore, since the New World Order Plan envisions eliminating cities, we might expect that earthquakes would be a preferred weapon of choice. Severe earthquakes might result in the wholesale evacuation of cities.
2. Hurricanes and/or Typhoons -- Wind has proven to be such a devastating force that, once again, it might force large-scale evacuation of cities if the incidence of hurricanes were to become so regular as to render a city location untenable.
3. Flooding -- Rampaging waters are a huge force that threatens entire regions of the country. Since the goal is to force farmers out of business, or to return the most fertile farmlands back to "Nature" [which New Agers call 'Rewilding'], floods would be a most useful weapon. Flooding can also force farmers to miss an entire planting and growing season, thus reducing the amount of food available to a population. Most people think of a lack of food being caused by drought, when the reality is that flooding at the wrong time of the year can produce an equal loss of food production.

4. Drought -- Lack of water is more devastating to farming than flooding. Since the population growth of the past 60 years would not have been possible had it not been for the growth in food production, we might expect that drought might be a useful tool in persuading people of the need to drastically reduce population growth.


In both flooding and drought, we have the potential of totally devastating a people's way of life.

Remember that the overall goal of the New World Order Plan is to reduce the world's population by two-thirds, and to set aside over 50% of America and other nations that would not off limits to humans for using or residing. These same people, i.e., Gore, Clinton, Bush now have control both over the amount of emergency stocks of food and of Weather Control capabilities!

5. Tsunami Waves -- If someone would want to force people away from living on the coastline of any nation, consistent tsunami waves would be the ideal tool. This huge wave is totally devastating and terribly frightening.
6. Volcanoes -- Erupting volcanoes can also dramatically change the landscape of the region in which it is located. Nearby cities can, and have been, eliminated.
7. Tornadoes -- We have experienced such an increase in devastating tornado activity, one has to really wonder why.
8. Severe Heat over a long period of time -- Of course, this capability produces the Drought of which we speak, above, and probably should have been mentioned in conjunction with it. However, our nation is currently in the grip of unprecedented heat this summer. How many consecutive days of 100+ degree weather does it take for fertile and productive farmland to be turned into wasteland? Does anyone know? Are we about to find out?

Now, let us return back to this United Nations' treaty prohibiting the hostile, or military, use of Weather Modification capabilities.1. The provisions of this Convention shall not hinder the use of environmental modification techniques for peaceful purposes and shall be without prejudice to the generally recognized principles and applicable rules of international law concerning such use.-

The first page of this report simply sets forth the framework into which the treaty fits, and is generally not exciting. However, a couple of points jump out at you when you read it carefully.

A. Paragraph 1, beginning with the word "Guided" -- "Guided by the interest of consolidating peace, and wishing to contribute to the cause of halting the arms race, and of bringing about general and complete disarmament under strict and effective international control ..." Were you aware that the entire world, including the United States, was engaged in "general and complete disarmament under strict and effective international control"? Not only is general disarmament of independent nations of the world a New World Order goal, but the turning over of weapons, materiel, and men to the United Nations is a long term goal! ''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PS- I DO BELIEVE THIS TREATY PROVES THE TECHNOLOGY IS HERE and has been for quite some time (deffinitly long enough to have mastered weather control),which means I was wrong and ''climate change'' is a real problem, AND IS MAN MADE.. .... ---> THIS TREATY DOES SAY IT IS OK TO MODIFY WEATHER FOR PEACEFULL PURPOSES such as disarmerment and depopulation!!! IT JUST SAYS ''HOSTILE'' weather control is not allowed..WDF?? ARTICLE 111 CLEARLY STATES THIS.. I thought this was VERY INTERESTING, considering ALLLLLL the floods and devistation weve had since ''The big O'' has been in office..GA WAS THE DRYEST STATE THE COUNTRY HAS EVER SEEN LAST YEAR, this year were flooded..The floods in the midwest displaced more people than Katrina, with no news play or mention of ALL the deviststaion..



-- Modified on 11/16/2009 5:35:58 AM