anyone ever passed on a provider because of too many tatts ?
I'm not a fan of tattoos, and never have been. My grandfather, who had many, made me promise not to ever get one.
Today it would seem that young people who really want to be different and avante garde don't have tat's.
Having said that, it's almost impossible to find a provider who doesn't have them. Two or three small ones are fine, but much more than that ruins a woman's looks. Just my .02.
-- Modified on 6/27/2014 8:26:30 AM
Duh. I replied to my own post. Senior moment.
-- Modified on 6/27/2014 8:26:12 AM
I'm not a fan of tattoos, but they don't bother me. You are correct in your assertion, that not modifying your body, has become the "how to be different".
Asked a fool the other day why he was getting these gig ass chunks of wood shoved in his ears. He said to be different. Everyone else in the room also had big ass chunks of wood in their ears.
My response was, you are not being different, you are actually conforming to the norm
... needless to say, the young man couldn't understand what I was saying.
Today it would seem that young people who really want to be different and avante garde don't have tat's.
Having said that, it's almost impossible to find a provider who doesn't have them. Two or three small ones are fine, but much more than that ruins a woman's looks. Just my .02.
-- Modified on 6/27/2014 8:26:30 AM
Cone Mills was a major supplier of denim fabric to Levi Strauss. About 1970, a major hurricane hit the warehouses, and millions of yards of denim were ruined.
Some genius, and I do mean genius, got the idea to salvage the blotched fabric by coming up with the tie-dyed look. They went ahead and made jeans with the damaged denim, and they charged more to make it more appealing to gullible young people. They sold all of the damaged denim and even had to make more.
About that time I predicted that the fashionista's would at some point make popular the old style union suit long underwear, and the fashion would be to wear it with the rear flap down, exposing the butt cheeks. Considering the baggy-pants-and-butt-crack look that won't seem to go away, I was in the ballpark
Tats are a prequisite i require to fuck me or hang with me for free. I wont date a guy with out any ink,
I actually specifically had in mind when designing my back piece how it would help me in attracting the guys with the ink, And oh boy it did! i get approached by every hot guy with a huge sexy back piece and sleeves and ink every where i go, They always come up and go hey whats the tat oh thats so hot!
My mission in my tat was to atract the men i love .
I never even once took into consideration if my customers would like it, I dont take that into account before i make my choices on clothing , hewelry or dress, i just do what i feel sexy wearing or whatever body art i know will; be an asset to my life body life experience, story,
.............................................
I definetly wouldnt want to meet any guys that hate ink, They are probly stuck up snooty little bitches ! hahahah
Nah. Just old. 
Her wings are spectacular and not distracting. I don't like it when a gal (or anyone) has a mish-mosh of tats. But Angel's are almost like an organic part of her. And all black.
when it went into the wash.
I could wear that if it helps.
8o)
Seems like it will be just like a fantas
that actually attracted me to a woman. I like a little "edginess" and the confidence of self-expression.
OTOH, I've seen some that I wasn't fond of - but nothing that would make me "pass" solely on that basis
I don’t mind tattoos but, if significant portion of their body is covered, I pass. Don’t go for Gothic, S&M either. Real Tantra, count me in. Not the fake crap, everyone advertises for one to two hours, that’s for suckers.
Too much, and they don't seem entirely naked to me. And that can be a deal breaker
Bonus douche points.
That's why I put giant disclaimers all over my shit saying that I have a lot of ink. Don't like tattoos? Don't see me. Totally fine.
What I do have a problem with is when dudes see someone who clearly doesn't meet their specific aesthetic tastes, then bitch about the girl's appearance. All the time, I'll see some guy's review of a BBW, wherein he says something to the effect of "Her photos are accurate, but she is way too big for my taste," followed by a shitty appearance score. If you know going in that you aren't into thick chicks, stay away from BBWs. If you only like redheads, don't make a date with a black girl. Prefer tall ladies? Skip right over my ass.
Love unblemished skin, but Tobi Telford, for example, has some awesome body art and I enjoy that, too. I'm easy. Kind of a slut, actually. 
And I'm not sure why. I don't have ink, nor do I wear jewelry, not even a watch. I can afford jewelry, I just don't like it on me, not the way it looks but the way it feels.
Now though, ink intrigues me, not that it's a turn on, but I love the female body so much that I think it gives me something to look at other than her womanly curves while I make the journey from the lips on a woman's face completely around her entire body ignoring her pussy until last and then yummy.
I have enjoyed some really wonderful women with more than average ink and I think the added attraction for me is for her to tell me about each one during the down time. Women seem to be very passionate about their ink and it's a turn on for me to see that passion, and some of the stories about them are pretty cool too.
So, to answer the question directly, no I wouldn't pass on a woman for too much ink, in fact there are at least two ladies that I'm anticipating seeing to see their ink, amongst other reasons.
Funny how we change our tastes and likes, huh?
Assuming we are not talking about gang affiliated tats and tribal armbands.