I just agreed with Sola that price and volume are not necessarily cause and effect.
By your reasoning even at a thousand bucks it would hardly be worth the effort.
My honest opinion on the subject would be to draw the line somewhere around 2 sessions a day. I honestly don't know how the true "high volume" ladies can take having sex with 30+ different guys a week. I once saw 40 different women over a ten day span. While enjoyable it's something I have no intentions of ever repeating. That much sex is just plain "work", and takes all the fun out of it.
Each girl is different. But in general, fewer clients compared to other people. I would think 5 a day would be high volume. I consider myself "low volume", as I only see 1-2 people a week on average. Of course it varies sometimes. And half the time those that I see are regulars, so I'm not even seeing new people very often.
basically no touring girls. They tend to come around for a few days and make as much as possible and go back home. They may not work for the rest of the month but seeing 6-10 guys in two days is still high volume.
I prefer to see ladies who have full time jobs and only do this once or twice a week. I also prefer to book longer dates vs the hour so that she makes more money with me, and can say no for the next few days.
Rates are also an indicator of someone who is definitly not high volume. It's not an exact science but a girl charging a grand is not seeing as many as someone charging 300. Not many people can afford that kind of cash on a regular basis.
i consider myself low volume, as i see on average 1 to 2 clients and week and mostly regulars at that.
some people are describing 5-10 clients a week as low volume, that would be moderate to high in my book, but that's just me.
and no, you won't often see someone describe themselves as "high volume," but many providers see a high number of clients a day, a week, a year, etc. and are quite proud of it. i think from reading a woman's website or ads you can get a very clear idea on whether she is high or low volume.
some hints that a provider may be high volume:
on her website or ad, she says something like, "please allow for 30 min/1 hour notice", "view my calendar and request to book an appointment", things of that nature. and of course if a provider tours often i would say that more than likely they are high volume.
but high volume or low volume, neither is any better or worse than the other, it's all about what one is most comfortable with in this biz.
LOL exactly! It is a little amusing to see girls say they "only" see five or ten guys a week. WTF! Why would they not just raise their rates and see half that...I would be more willing to pay extra for someone who is not rode hard and put away wet.
while a $1000/hr provider is not likely to have dozens of dates a month simply due to the fact that few can afford such an expense...many providers have very reasonable or even fairly low rates and are still very low volume, simply because $$$$ may not be their driving motivation in the biz.
examples of this would be those providers who have successful full-time careers and simply escort for "extras," thrill seekers, and those like myself who do it to fulfill a long-time fantasy and desire.
While many girls claim your last sentence, I see what goes on behind closed doors, and from those who have opened up to me as a confidant and friend. If a girl has a full time career, she is likely to charge "more" because she does not have to do this.
My ideal week is three friends each week for companionship, supplimented with three FBSM.
I consider that low volume. My rates are $180-$300/hr. It's a fair rate, about right for my local market, and allows some of the most adorable men in the world to visit.
I get more requests than I have interest or availability for with my schedule, to the point that just yesterday I posted on my website and local board that I am not entertaining requests from for new visitors until at least May. I prefer to keep the limited time I have available for those I know and adore and very much seeing rather than book all interested parties and work solely for $'s.
Rates do not equate to volume other than as it restricts the pool of hobbyists who are in your price range.
I just agreed with Sola that price and volume are not necessarily cause and effect.
By your reasoning even at a thousand bucks it would hardly be worth the effort.
My honest opinion on the subject would be to draw the line somewhere around 2 sessions a day. I honestly don't know how the true "high volume" ladies can take having sex with 30+ different guys a week. I once saw 40 different women over a ten day span. While enjoyable it's something I have no intentions of ever repeating. That much sex is just plain "work", and takes all the fun out of it.
it's a bit disheartening to me that some hobbyists are so jaded or close-minded that they can't imagine that every woman in this biz is not motivated by money, money and more money.
like you i enjoy spending time with gents with whom i'm comfortable and know very well, new clients are very few and far between for me. also because i am a wife and homemaker, and naturally my Husband and family come first, this restricts the time frames during which i can see clients as well as the number. i am very happy with two 1 or 2 hour dates a week, one six hour or longer date a month, working only 3 wks every month. my hourly rate is well under $300, because that is the rate with which i am most comfortable as it is enough to keep proper boundaries in place but not so much to limit the types of gents i may see. i have no desire to limit myself to only CEOs, overpaid attorneys and doctors...it is the character of a man that matters to me, not his income.
every lady is unqiue. Finding the ladies who meet your needs is what TER is about.
And
once I have found such a gem, does her business volume matter, as long as I am happy with our times together and don't have too hard a time rescheduling? Is what she does with her time outside of sessions my business at all? I think not.
From what I've read and heard, Ciara, you are one of those rare gems who provide an exquisite experience at a very reasonable rate. I would adore the opportunity to share a few hours with you one auspicious day.
A way to make a guy feel special. Give the illusion that he's not 5th in line.
I say this because any provider can use the term, there's no way to verify and there's no set definition. Also, a lady could see few guys because her service is bad. There's no regulation of advertising in this business.
It can also mean a few dates a day. A few years ago I was doing a double with a provider and she had arrived in the city before me. We were both working single but doing 2 doubles together..my only ones. She told me..she had 8 dates the next day. I was shocked. i was blown away, because she is a very well known provider. In fact, because of that info, I will not refer her. To me 8 dates a day is not only risky behavior, but how do you give it your best? And the biggest thing...when do you wash your hair and keep yourself looking like a 10? Think of how many knocks are on her door and what number in line you will be.
So low volume to me is either a couple a day...or a couple a week. they are both low.
I see 5 clients per month at max but then again my dates usually consist of 2 or 3 dinner dates, a couple of overnights and a weekend date thrown in here or there so I have no need or desire to work everyday. I would still say that 1 - 2 clients per day puts her in the regular range but anything over that is high volume imho.
I see 1 maybe 2 FS clients a week.. I see fetish clients more often at about 2-3x a week. When I was in nashville I would say I was more average volume at 3-5 FS clients a week and I gotta admit that is VERY draining for me.Not my preference....
Men should stop being so literal. The lady is trying to increase her status and appeal to you as a consumer. Realistically 'low volume' doesn't relate to a number.
I say low volume is a max of 4 per month. medium is a max 8 per month high is 9+ per month. I think if all things were considered equal and a provider's hourly rate was the primary determining factor in a specific market, the providers that charged the highest rates would get less business because when viewed from this perspective, pussy is pussy.
Personally, I do not care to visit with more than 2 gentlemen per day I am available, if I am doing hourly sessions. But if I were doing 2+ hr sessions, I would only want the 1 visitor in 1 day.
On these booked days, if I were to take another appointment, it would have to be a non-fs fetish or massage session.
I do not like a lot of foot traffic into the places I entertain from. Also, I prefer to stay happy and composed. If I were to entertain more frequently, my composure might not be so smooth. And being smooth and composed is more important to me, than being a robot who takes caller after caller.
I understand your question, Texbaseball, and it's legitimate.
However, "some" of the other posters answering your question are a bit ignorant. I don't find it particularly funny that some men think they have the answers for everything or what they deem is correct. They obviously don't have a clue about our business and they need to mind their own business. I am certain (without a doubt) that I am very, very low volume, and I should charge more but I don't . . . period! It has nothing to do with not taking a lot of appointments or that I'm ugly, because I'm not!
Men, please stop ASSuming you know the norm. Just because a woman's donations are 150 or 260 does not mean she sees five men a day. In fact, there are days that I don't even see one man (and I only would see one man in a day). Also, donations do not always reflect a woman's beauty and performance. I'm not being vain here, but I know I cater to men and sensuality, and I'm certainly not a dog.
It cracks me up how ignorant some people can be. Sorry! I gave up caffeine and I am not as patient today, but some of the reponses to this topic (that has been dredged through the mill) are ridiculous, like others so frequently posted on this board.
For example: 1) "Ladies, should we shave?" 2) "She was not the girl in the picture and gave a lousy performance, should I review her?" Duh! Let other guys know about it, dumnie. 3) "What is a GFE?" Well, TER provides definitions for everything and -- even though some people's viewpoints vary on this issue -- it is pretty obvious to the casual observer that you are getting full service and it should be intimate and friendly (like a girlfriend).
If you are a newbie, then post on the newbie board but not on the general discussion board about these things.
Sorry, I just needed to vent since I have been posting for years and I can understand one of these questions a month, but every week? Come on people! Okay, I am going to go eat some chocolate now and ignore some of these posts.
Yours truly, The adorable, the sarcastic, the funny, the caring, the sensuous, the wise, the smart ass, the advisor -- CIARA (or so I've been told).
I was trying to be cute and the minute I pushed submit I was trying to delete it but didn't know how. I am so sorry for being such a jerk. I am slow because of the economy and not happy about it. So I am low volume right now but trying not to be. Please forgive me Cierra.
though I have to admit that high volume squirting can be a bit disconcerting when one is not prepared to expect it. I do consider either high volume lubricity or, really, any volume of squirting, to be desirable, and actually, something of a compliment, on the order of high volume queefing.
OTOH high volume vocalization makes me a bit nervous, as charming as it is, especially in a hotel situation. I've had the help run in to see what was wrong on one occasion....
Unfortunately it looks like your attempt to purchase VIP membership has failed due to your card being declined. Good news is that we have several other payment options that you could try.
VIP MEMBER
, you are now a VIP member!
We thank you for your purchase!
VIP MEMBER
, Thank you for becoming VIP member!
Membership should be activated shortly. You'll receive notification!
