I'm a lawyer, you dumb shit.
I gave anyone who happened to read your nonsense and wanted a meaningful explanation of why you dont know what you're talking about, a simple one.
Nothing you wrote has any legal meaning or value. Period.
All you do is invent terms that do not exist and twist them to support an absurd argument.
You cite a law that is not even relevant to the issue you raised.
Statutory rape is not about prostitution; it is unlawful however it is practiced, whether money is involved or not. The law you cite is about statutory rape.
I waste enough of my professional life dealing with attorneys who either invent facts or misrepresent the law and dont want to waste any of my private life on it - especially not in the case of someone who so clearly has no idea what the hell he is talking about. You quoted a Spanish word and pretended the phrase means something it clearly does not. So I quoted a simple translation of the word and then explained what it means within the context of the quoted sentence.
The comments made above this one about the Health Card were a great explanation and should have ended the issue.
The fact that providers openly work in TJ makes this conversation essentially worthless, except to those who are curious about how and why and what the limitations on those rules are.
What got me is that your comments about the law are such utter nonsense I figured I should not leave them unaddressed since it was so obvious how and why they are.
You are either a moron or for some reason hoping to worry people over nothing. Either way, you are a waste of time to bother about other than to explain why for someone who might not see it so easily.
But if you personally fear that prostitution in TJ is unlawful, I recommend that you not take part in it, and respect the laws of a sister nation.
Quote:
Posted By: Kadjevic
Hahaha you go off Yahoo Answers Mexico for legal interpretation huh? Mental capacity is a very broad term that is interpreted differently depending on the application. Your attorney would argue that it only applies to mentally handicapped people and the State would argue that someone hard-pressed for funds on the verge of utter poverty would not make rational decisions. It would be up to your lawyer and the courts to fight it out, but your lawyer would obviously charge you by the hour. Want to risk it? I wouldn't.
The Supreme Court of Mexico has said that it is not the State's job to interpret charges and case circumstances. It has also said that it is the State's job to interpret charges. Which one is correct? It's a dice roll. Every country's legal system is like this. You saying anything otherwise shows your naivety and the citation of Yahoo Answers Mexico really shows it clear.
Either your Spanish is completely sub-standard or you're looking at a completely different penal code than I am. Section IV does mention minors, but also mentions incapacity. However, you don't need to meet all subsection requirements to be charged. You only need to meet 1. Section I, II, or III is good enough for any State attorney to levy a charge against you if he or she feels it necessary.
You're confusing law theory with law practice. One is taught in the classroom and one is argued over in court. The latter is never certain. But they don't address that in Yahoo Answers, do they?
-- Modified on 7/22/2012 7:52:24 AM
-- Modified on 7/22/2012 7:57:54 AM