I'd say no, as many here don't seem to grasp this concept.

Is composed of members who have joined this site for, in part, the discretionary aspects of it, I have to wonder what chemical interference led to your conclusion that discretion doesn't matter to us.

By the way, do you mean discretion as it relates to privacy,  or as it relates to decision making?  You didn't specify and you haven't demonstrated an understanding of either concept with your baiting, trolling post

Someone could paint a very ugly picture with that chatter.

 
That doesn't mean that picture is true... but the damage could have already been done.

 

Do you really want to discuss baiting a post?

I've taken every post here with all seriousness.

Guess you do as well.

Can you tell us the story of how misunderstood you are...again?  

And no, I'm all set on how posts are baited.

Your debate skills are deplorable... don't quit your day job.

I'll write slowly so that it may sink in.  The.....YOU. ...in...your. ....OP....means. ....ALL....of......us....who.....read.....it.

Then when you write "I'd say no"  

you.....are.....saying....that.....the. ....reader.....(all.....of....us)....are.....not....concerned. ...with.....discretion

What I read on the board gives the impression that the majority of board posters are not discreet.

 
Do I fully believe every person who reads this board is indiscreet? No.

 
Could someone else believe everything they read? Yes they can

is at the top of my list, and establishing trust is a major factor for me....

People don't value privacy.  Too bad.  Those with a lot of lose though need and demand it.

I gave you an attaboy above, now I gotta give you an awshit...

when you have to 'splain the joke, it fails... the quotes around 'trick' were enough..

get back in the circle now