Name one culture where women can own a man as property
Do you think your wives, or fiances, or gfs would understand if they found out that you hobby? I wonder how many hobbyists actually introduced their SO to hobbying.
I was having a convo with a friend about tinder. Apparently tinder is riddled with couples looking for a girl for sex. So I'm sure here's plenty of couples out there who would love to partake in the hobbyists escapades. Maybe they are just too cheap to hire an escort lol.
Thoughts?
Lol some girls are ok with 3somes one day...then not ok with it the next day...some women might be more pissed about their man putting money into another woman's pcket over the actual cheating part.. Shits cray..
But I have been having a lot more sessions with couples lately..and it's no secret Savy is a super rug muncher. Definitely feel pretty confident that I'm going to see a lot of those women again..specifically for one on one sessions. (Yea boiiii)
-- Modified on 3/19/2016 5:47:33 PM
I liked for the subject line alone lmao. EOM
But I have been having a lot more sessions with couples lately..and it's no secret Savy is a super rug muncher. Definitely feel pretty confident that I'm going to see a lot of those women again..specifically for one on one sessions. (Yea boiiii)
-- Modified on 3/19/2016 5:47:33 PM
Though I think she used it as a pretext to get a good divorce settlement because for a while she wanted to meet my closest providers for threesomes.
My current wife is a former proviser and endorses my hobbying.
-- Modified on 3/19/2016 8:46:08 PM
I'm single, and don't really have the desire to get married. If I was in a committed relationship, I probably wouldn't see escorts (unless I had my girlfriend's permission).
I don't think I'd tell a current GF that I saw escorts in the past (what I did with my dick when we weren't committed really isn't her goddamn business). I really wouldn't care if she finds out, if asked about it I'm not going to lie but I'm not going to bring it up. If she reacts positively to the fact that I used to see escorts, great, maybe we can work out a couples session. If she reacts negatively, this just shows me that the relationship was doomed.
when she found out what i did.....but we have been together for a very very long time, and lucky for me she forgave me and chose to join me in the hobby, now we only do this together..........never again would i put her through the pain i caused her......we have a great time now and i love it!!
I was having a convo with a friend about tinder. Apparently tinder is riddled with couples looking for a girl for sex. So I'm sure here's plenty of couples out there who would love to partake in the hobbyists escapades. Maybe they are just too cheap to hire an escort lol.
Thoughts?
The comment about Tinder being rife with people looking for the elusive "unicorn" (single woman to be part of MFF 3 way) is so true. Also the same on other hookup sites and SB/SD sites.
I was seeing a bi-woman that wanted to have a 3some. We put ads on CL and such...got close once but it never materialized. We were utterly convinced that having a 3some was a completely unattainable goal.
After ending things with her; I was a bit jaded and began dipping into the sugar bowl. Much to my amazement, after many duds, I landed a SB who soon offered (her idea) to get her girlfriend together with us. Needless to say, it happened and was an unforgettable evening. I thought I had won the lottery.
Then I found this place and realized how easy it could have been all along. Duh. If only all of those couples on CL, Tinder, etc knew ... the world would be a happier, if not stickier, place.
You think so?
I was having a convo with a friend about tinder. Apparently tinder is riddled with couples looking for a girl for sex. So I'm sure here's plenty of couples out there who would love to partake in the hobbyists escapades. Maybe they are just too cheap to hire an escort lol.
Thoughts?
Male or female, if they don't have an "open relationship" then it's adultery, cheating, whatever-you-wanna-call-it, regardless of who their partner is screwing.
Then there's the usual stereotypes about escorts which can come into play: that he likely caught something and brought it home to her, if he's seeing escorts he must be doing drugs too, or that it obviously means he has a desire to demean women.... because all escorts are being degraded, of course.
Thoughts?
It usually has nothing to do with spending money, as "lifestyle" couples often spend quite a bit of cash going to parties, Meet N Greets, on website memberships, etc before even getting to play. Some make regular trips to Vegas just to play.
Sure there are a few who have gone the escort route, and probably far more than will admit to it, but many of the ones who have definitely look at it as being something dirty, illicit, and even a little bit shameful.
The women don't want to be with an escort either for the reasons already mentioned, fear of STDs, or simply because they can't believe a pro would be really "into it". They only want to fuck someone who's there solely because she wants it too, no compensation involved.
I cannot fault them for that last reason, though I do take issue with pretty much all of the others lol.
One little tidbit: I learned that with many/most of the couples seeking FMF, the female is not actually bisexual or even truly bi-curious. She's just going along with it for her SO. Big bummer for me. LOL.
That's just one of the reasons I was never very comfortable seeing couples as a provider, and no longer offer it now.
xoxoxoxoxooxoxoxoxoxoxoxoxoxoxoxxooxoxoxoxoxoxoxoxox
NOONER: (noun) A sexual encounter during lunch hour, especially one that is illicit.
-- Modified on 3/20/2016 6:30:39 AM
i completely agree with you...
even though i do duos with another provider, i do not cater to couples and declines a few requests )
Then there's the usual stereotypes about escorts which can come into play: that he likely caught something and brought it home to her, if he's seeing escorts he must be doing drugs too, or that it obviously means he has a desire to demean women.... because all escorts are being degraded, of course.
Thoughts?
Having spent a significant amount of time in the swinger world, I can tell you that the female half of any couple seeking FMF is going to be just as biased against escorts as any other civvie woman. Some of them are even more prejudiced against providers because they honestly believe we're setting women back; harming other women's efforts to be free of social stigmas regarding sexuality vs morality.
It usually has nothing to do with spending money, as "lifestyle" couples often spend quite a bit of cash going to parties, Meet N Greets, on website memberships, etc before even getting to play. Some make regular trips to Vegas just to play.
Sure there are a few who have gone the escort route, and probably far more than will admit to it, but many of the ones who have definitely look at it as being something dirty, illicit, and even a little bit shameful.
The women don't want to be with an escort either for the reasons already mentioned, fear of STDs, or simply because they can't believe a pro would be really "into it". They only want to fuck someone who's there solely because she wants it too, no compensation involved.
I cannot fault them for that last reason, though I do take issue with pretty much all of the others lol.
One little tidbit: I learned that with many/most of the couples seeking FMF, the female is not actually bisexual or even truly bi-curious. She's just going along with it for her SO. Big bummer for me. LOL.
That's just one of the reasons I was never very comfortable seeing couples as a provider, and no longer offer it now.
xoxoxoxoxooxoxoxoxoxoxoxoxoxoxoxxooxoxoxoxoxoxoxoxox
NOONER: (noun) A sexual encounter during lunch hour, especially one that is illicit.
-- Modified on 3/20/2016 6:30:39 AM
have rules against having pros involved. Debbie is correct about female swingers. They get wind a provider is involved and see ya. I know if I ever brought up the subject of including a pro our little "off the books fun" would come to a sudden stop.
Were heading to Desire in Mexico next week. That is not an inexpensive place, it's not an issue with price. It is an issue of perception.
While my sample size is small most of the women looking for other women, we have met, were doing it because they wanted to.
Then there's the usual stereotypes about escorts which can come into play: that he likely caught something and brought it home to her, if he's seeing escorts he must be doing drugs too, or that it obviously means he has a desire to demean women.... because all escorts are being degraded, of course.
Thoughts?
Having spent a significant amount of time in the swinger world, I can tell you that the female half of any couple seeking FMF is going to be just as biased against escorts as any other civvie woman. Some of them are even more prejudiced against providers because they honestly believe we're setting women back; harming other women's efforts to be free of social stigmas regarding sexuality vs morality.
It usually has nothing to do with spending money, as "lifestyle" couples often spend quite a bit of cash going to parties, Meet N Greets, on website memberships, etc before even getting to play. Some make regular trips to Vegas just to play.
Sure there are a few who have gone the escort route, and probably far more than will admit to it, but many of the ones who have definitely look at it as being something dirty, illicit, and even a little bit shameful.
The women don't want to be with an escort either for the reasons already mentioned, fear of STDs, or simply because they can't believe a pro would be really "into it". They only want to fuck someone who's there solely because she wants it too, no compensation involved.
I cannot fault them for that last reason, though I do take issue with pretty much all of the others lol.
One little tidbit: I learned that with many/most of the couples seeking FMF, the female is not actually bisexual or even truly bi-curious. She's just going along with it for her SO. Big bummer for me. LOL.
That's just one of the reasons I was never very comfortable seeing couples as a provider, and no longer offer it now.
xoxoxoxoxooxoxoxoxoxoxoxoxoxoxoxxooxoxoxoxoxoxoxoxox
NOONER: (noun) A sexual encounter during lunch hour, especially one that is illicit.
-- Modified on 3/20/2016 6:30:39 AM
... like you suggest, she does not like the idea of hiring a professional.
Her rationale however is completely illogical. She just doesn't like the idea of a "slutty girl" who's been with a million other couples in the last week.
... So I'm like "well, pretty much anyone who is pollyamorous or heavily swinging is probably going to be pretty sexually active, don't you think?" Not like we're going to find many virgins in the polly community. haha
She is BSing you, read between the lines.
I think you nailed it on the head.
She does not want me to even date other people. I miss the hobby and only been gone 1 month. Hard to do this dating. Love the p4p and no bloviating. She would have a fit about the hobby. She doesn't even like a waitress at the waffle house because one screwed a girlfriends husband. Lol.
This is a separate world for me and I choose discreet!
If and when I had a GF. I chose NOT to hobby
and so now I am an old man with no wife and no family (kids haven't talked to me in 7 years). But, now I don't have to hide it anymore and man that's refreshing.
I was having a convo with a friend about tinder. Apparently tinder is riddled with couples looking for a girl for sex. So I'm sure here's plenty of couples out there who would love to partake in the hobbyists escapades. Maybe they are just too cheap to hire an escort lol.
Thoughts?
If my man is in need of sex elsewhere I'd be upset naturally, but I'd prefer he was seeing a provider than boning some woman in his office on the side. This is a service, it's business, no feelings are involved, I won't get breathy phone calls in the night from some stalker girl, providers look after their sexual health and use covers so I won't get some STI.
Logically it makes more sense for women to be less upset about it than an affair I think?
Yes, it is more logical, but just ask any hooker who has ever had to field a call as the "other woman" about how logical any of those women were at the time.
is when did women become possessive of their male mates?
It's not natural, or the least bit feminine. Being possessive/protective of one's mate/s is more of a masculine trait.
We are almost all possessive as shit. Your ignorance of this is astounding.
Did you read any of his last several posts? Many of them were completely out of character for him and actually made sense. I have to confess I am kind of relieved to have our moron back to his usual rather obtuse self.
Men are predominately the more possessive sex.
And as is the case with 99% of what you write, it was simply wrong. As was your follow-up.
Name one culture where women can own a man as property
I honestly don't expect you realize how nonsensical that is. Name one culture where men can own women as property.
I mean reproductively speaking. Males are possessive because they need to ensure that their genes are passed on, and that he doesn't waste his time and energy rearing someone else's offspring.
Women, on the other hand, are not NATURALLY possessive, although I believe that society at large and the way we bring up women has changed a lot of that obviously. We teach women at an early age that their greatest aspiration is to be a Princess, who will be swept off her feet by a handsome Prince. So obviously, if that Prince is her meal ticket, then she's going to feel protective of her source of income. But obviously, it's a very different kind of possessive.
where were you when I needed someone to explain that to the ex?
Logically it makes more sense for women to be less upset about it than an affair I think?