It has been six months since my last post and my sabbatical annoncement, but with all of the changes to Club 300, I felt an update was due.
Club 300 is all of the ladies on TER with over 300 Reviews and who are still active. A couple of providers on the previous Club 300 List have become inactive and at least one new lady has joined the club.
As always, numbers are just the begining, the reviews tell the stories.
Here is the breakdown of the ladies of Club 300.
Lila – http://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/show.asp?id=19900
625 Reviews since February 2002 - the most reviewed woman on TER
3.28 Average Days per Review, the 2nd fastest pace in C300
7.90 Average Overall Rating 9th highest in C300
8.45 Average Performance Rating 7th highest in C300
7.36 Average Looks Rating 7th highest in C300
Mag/Maggie – http://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/show.asp?id=3778
441 Reviews since March 2001 - the 2nd most reviewed woman on TER
5.42 Average Days per Review, the 7th fastest pace in C300
7.55 Average Overall Rating 11th highest in C300
7.80 Average Performance Rating 12th highest in C300
7.29 Average Looks Rating 10th highest in C300
Jenny – http://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/show.asp?id=58972
418 Reviews since April 2005 - the 3rd most reviewed woman on TER
2.15 Average Days per Review, the fastest pace in C300
8.06 Average Overall Rating 5th highest in C300
8.41 Average Performance Rating 8th highest in C300
7.71 Average Looks Rating 5th highest in C300
Betty of South Jersey – http://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/show.asp?id=13978
390 Reviews since May 2002 - the 4th most reviewed woman on TER
5.04 Average Days per Review, the 6th fastest pace in C300
7.08 Average Overall Rating the lowest in C300
8.30 Average Performance Rating 10th highest in C300
5.86 Average Looks Rating the lowest in C300
Terri – http://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/show.asp?id=508
385 Reviews since January 2000 - the 5th most reviewed woman on TER
7.31 Average Days per Review, the 11th fastest pace in C300
7.97 Average Overall Rating 7th highest in C300
8.55 Average Performance Rating 6th highest in C300
7.39 Average Looks Rating 6th highest in C300
Cumisha Amado – http://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/show.asp?id=3580
370 Reviews since February 2001 - the 6th most reviewed woman on TER
6.54 Average Days per Review, the 9th fastest pace in C300
8.03 Average Overall Rating 6th highest in C300
8.75 Average Performance Rating 3rd highest in C300
7.32 Average Looks Rating 9th highest in C300
Maxine – http://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/show.asp?id=39753
353 Reviews since February 2004 - the 7th most reviewed woman on TER
3.75 Average Days per Review, the 3rd fastest pace in C300
7.15 Average Overall Rating 12th highest in C300
7.35 Average Performance Rating the lowest in C300
6.94 Average Looks Rating 11th highest in C300
Samantha – http://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/show.asp?id=6146
351 Reviews since July 2001 - the 8th most reviewed woman on TER
6.46 Average Days per Review, the 8th fastest pace in C300
8.12 Average Overall Rating 4th highest in C300
8.20 Average Performance Rating 11th highest in C300
8.04 Average Looks Rating 4th highest in C300
Gina Rollins – http://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/show.asp?id=35521
350 Reviews since December 2003 - the 12th most reviewed woman on TER
3.96 Average Days per Review, the 5th fastest pace in C300
8.54 Average Overall Rating, the 2nd highest in C300
8.92 Average Performance Rating the highest in C300
8.17 Average Looks Rating 3rd highest in C300
Victoria – http://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/show.asp?id=38923
344 Reviews since January 2004 - the 9th most reviewed woman on TER
3.94 Average Days per Review, the 4th fastest pace in C300
8.59 Average Overall Rating the highest in C300
8.80 Average Performance Rating 2nd highest in C300
8.39 Average Looks Rating, the highest in C300
Jordan Kay – http://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/show.asp?id=5778
339 Reviews since June 2001 - the 10th most reviewed woman on TER
6.78 Average Days per Review, the 10th fastest pace in C300
8.50 Average Overall Rating, the 3rd highest in C300
8.68 Average Performance Rating 5th highest in C300
8.32 Average Looks Rating 2nd highest in C300
Debbie – http://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/show.asp?id=1500
325 Reviews since May 2000 - the 11th most reviewed woman on TER
8.29 Average Days per Review, the 12th fastest pace in C300
7.85 Average Overall Rating 9th highest in C300
8.36 Average Performance Rating 9th highest in C300
7.34 Average Looks Rating 8th highest in C300
Nicole/Nacole – http://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/show.asp?id=1998
301 Reviews since June 2000 - the 12th most reviewed woman on TER
8.85 Average Days per Review, the slowest pace in C300
7.79 Average Overall Rating 10th highest in C300
8.69 Average Performance Rating 4th highest in C300
6.89 Average Looks Rating 12th highest in C300
-- Modified on 9/17/2007 5:40:24 PM
My experience with this woman was 4 years ago. I still remember the afternoon/night as if it were yesterday. I remember the music, the hotel suite, the books on her desk, the sound of her voice... and just how much I enjoyed meeting her... but what made the evening truly special was that it was so spontaneous... there is no way the evening could be repeated... I went there for a 90 min session.... and left several hours later (in fact all the restaurants were closed... and I went to bed hungry that night!). If this woman is any indication of this level of provider - well, ladies this is a tall order to live up to (but I have an ATF or two who are in that league). I've not been back to see this lovely lady, simply because of my fear that no evening could ever live up to that night....
Truly a tribute to her as a person, a courtesan, a lady and as a woman, a truly naturally sexy woman.
I've been waiting (and wondering) who would be my 400th reviewer and what he was going to write about his experience with me.
Because is a milestone for me, I was hopping it was a nice review.
It is not nice...it's a wonderful review! It did capture what I am about and what I love to do to many of you, everyday.
So, a heartful thanks to "tallguy1162" for making my day and putting a smile in my face when I was reading your review 
Also, thanks to TER for the fantastic "tool" you provide to the girls in this business.
(and...thanks to Rate-A-Date too!)
xoxoxo
Betty
-- Modified on 9/17/2007 7:14:26 PM
Actually...you got your 391st review today. It may be your 40th page of reviews, but if you click on any hobbyist profile who you gave a white list reference to, TER only lists you as having 391.
for some reason, some of my reviews were deleted when TER changed their system.
Not sure why, but it happened...so, in my account, this is my 400th review.
-- Modified on 9/18/2007 5:21:58 AM
does not show up on my list.... there are little oddities like that about TER... but all in all, a great resource. and I agree it is a great resouce for both hobbiest and provider.
they all still have one other thing in common. . .
Other than 300 reviews.
Boys
Being
Boys
Joy
Through
Consummation
-thanks for all your effort, you shall be rewarded-
Do you know how long it took me to earn all my reviews? Five Years!
Many girls requires a review, make the guys do it...I don't, I leave for them to decided if they want to review or not.
So, it takes time to get up there in numbers, unless a client is forced to review
xoxoxo
Betty
It pertained to a certain "quality" that you all share that I am sure is part of your formula of success.
Nikki Avalon takes the top spot in performance, looks and average.
I have heard from many in the hobby, that its a 10 to 1 ratio...that is for every 10 clients a lady sees, she gets 1 review written about her.
So to get 625 reviews in 5 years, our Lila has seen over 6,250 gentlman. She is averaging 1,250 clients per year and just over 3.42 men a day..
So even at $200 per client (prob. low), Lila would be raking in $249,660 (all cash) per year or 1,248,300 over the five years. If she charges $350 an hour, that 5 year cash intake jumps to a whopping $2,184,525...What a wonderful country we live in!!!!
-- Modified on 9/18/2007 1:25:48 PM
any body that can sex 3.42 times a day for five years and still have anything close to a fresh attitude deserves every penny she gets.
Think you're on the high side. My ladies have told me 5-6 clients for each review so I'll go for 3,000. I think you're right on on your other numbers. Play a bit with me, let's say 3,000 men, at $300, that's a great living. At 6", that's 2,600 miles of cock. Not bad for an 8" tunnel. "What a wonderful country we live in."
3,000 x .5 feet = 1,500 feet = .284 miles, not counting "the old in-out, in-out".
I agree with your original point that 3,000 is probably a closer number and I arrived at that independently, for different reasons, in my post below.
Just trying to help.
filmat11
-- Modified on 9/18/2007 3:24:47 PM
I checked the math three times, but I was in marketing. Give me the old "in and out." Still, it gives new meaning to "fly me to the moon."
3000 X 0.5 feet X 60 SPM X 10 minutes = 900,000/5120 = 175.78 miles.
But of course, YMMV
What is the recommended interval between rings jobs?
OK Hardy, since you like calculating things, I would bet that these exceptional ladies have a higher percentage of reviews because 1) their performance inspires it and 2) they are sought out by the sort of people who write reviews. So your calculations could easily be off by a factor of 2.
Also, this is not really news. If escorts couldn't make at least 3 or 4 times what they would make as office managers or research assistants (i.e. $100,000 - $200,000), then very few people would choose the job.
My unsolicited advice to you would be to stop calculating how much they fuck and how much money they make and just enjoy yourself.
filmat11
-- Modified on 9/18/2007 3:05:05 PM