I believe so, because an animal has no way of expressing consent.

The communists at the ADA, are fans of Pharell?

If the mutt is already humping your leg, you can drop your pants as consent can be assumed.  

I don't care if you want cream in your coffee.

I wish I'd said that!

poor animals can't even complain with police.  Women can....Doesn't mean that they always will, but if they stay alive and are not murdered after rape (which does happen BTW...especially in third world fucked up countries in Middle East,India etc)

Isn't that a demeaning term? Couldn't it lead to a group think mentality that looks down on mutts that may lead to violence against them?

You got to be in between the legs before you start humping

You've mentioned this topic a number of times,  I'm starting to really wonder if you're into animals. None of us would be surprised if you were though.  Rofl    

as a matter of fact I'm against all human to non-human sexual relations.

They cannot use weapons..Other than the defense mechanism given to them by nature.. A dart shot of a tranquilizer can subdue a bear or a dog very easily...  

Rod is clueless as usual.

It's interesting that an OP meant to be gallows humor (I strongly suspect) brings out such deep and pure-hearted sentiment for animals from the same men who seem to condon verbal abuse toward women, and who ridicule anyone who doesn't join in that abuse.

not the same as abusing them for your prurient interests.  I guess one should be opposed to wearing leather then.. I guess some extreme liberals are.  

Which men are you referring to?  Can you cite some examples?

I'll admit that I did enjoy the movie Contact.  

But I will definitely enjoy my burger tonight, w/o feeling much guilty for killing an animal or violating my religion...LOL

Vern's love for animals is second only to his love for rapists.  

Not that the rape of women is "better," I just personally view any sort of cruelty to animals to be the most egregious offense that can be committed, simply because animals are innocent beings.

You have an obsession with, wanting me to be obsessed with rape.

fuck your food before you eat it.

of asking people to compare two atrocities, asking them to opine which is "worse," and then accusing them of condoning (or advocating) the other. The thought process in this thread seems to go, "Oh! You think animal cruelty is worse than rape?! That must mean that you think rape is okay! Why, you must be..!" Or, "You consider rape to be worse than animal cruelty?! Does that mean that you gleefully beat your miniature schnauzer?!"

I guess you just use food as a masturbatory tool and then throw it away.

And you're suggesting that the OP has logic?  LOL

I guess I could eat a cucumber after a girl used it to get her self off.

How about killing animals for food?  Is that fair?  The more I think about it,  killing animals for food isn't fair.  

What's worse molesting a child, or molesting an animal?

Looks like he's going to beat the crap out of his owner.

and you wash it first.

Okay so it's not just me who has no idea what WB is talking about.  

Posted By: ChgoCPA

And you're suggesting that the OP has logic?  LOL  
   
 You need a vacation from this board    
   

Posted By: WickedBrut

of asking people to compare two atrocities, asking them to opine which is "worse," and then accusing them of condoning (or advocating) the other. The thought process in this thread seems to go, "Oh! You think animal cruelty is worse than rape?! That must mean that you think rape is okay! Why, you must be..!" Or, "You consider rape to be worse than animal cruelty?! Does that mean that you gleefully beat your miniature schnauzer?!"  
     
  Maybe someone could flame out on a train that carefully explains the logic of this type of thought, or better, reveal the various logics held by sundry individuals.

...by which to gauge those levels. If you simply say one is "worse," aren't you implying that the other is "better?"

Looking for viewpoints from people with a variety of unrelated and unspecified backgrounds. I doubt that many walk around contemplating this type of question eight hours a day. But it could have different meanings and applications to different people. A doctor and a farmer could come up opposing values to the question, each work relevant

But some dude fucking an animal?

Steph

It hit me this afternoon that, while you're obnoxious and loathsome, one strange aspect of your so-called character is that you hang out in a forum where everyone despises you. I guess you get off on that, too, and not just rape and bestiality.

I guess you believe everything you read.

Your brain waves permanently late.
   
You think, not a chance.

Both are damn sick way of thinking in my book. Honestly, I didn't think of either one until I read your sick post. If there is one thing I would kill a person is, if I witness a man raping a women. That will definitely push me over the edge. It is the worst crime a man can commit, period.

It is a black hole at the moment.

Just don't fuck your OWN food before you eat it. See, that would wrong.

I'm talking about this NBC Olympic gold

You would only indulge in bestiality if it was considered rape.

So do you just look for this stuff or what?

Not getting enough, huh?  You're one sick pup (no pun intended)

Yeah that looks like a bad accident.

It's worse than rape..
But I love my steak. Yummmmmmmmm

But it was an apple pie.  Dear JCA, can you rape a pie

The time to worry is when what he say actually starts making sense. That's the time to seek professional help. lol

I actually think he is a plant, put here on this board by the turdster as to steal his title of "most clueless poster"

That said, no one has surpassed Fungy for pure, unadulterated stupidity. JCA is trying to be a troll, Fungy simply can't help himself.

But I know a kumquat in Anaheim who LOVES to kiss! Its CBJ sucks, but...