Let say you meet a provider she say she doesn't do hobbing out of her house but she doesn't have a holtel room but will get one when you get there.
a. Should I insist that I get the room In my name and I pay for it
I refuse to put any effort into making an appointment.
a. Should I insist that I get the room In my name and I pay for it
B. Make het get the room with her cash or drive off.
C. Pay her just enough for the room and the key deposit.
D. Just give her the donation and hope for the best if she rip you like thay do to me text in a bad review.
E. Go insist on going to lobby with her stand in line then giver her the rest of donations in the room,
F just forget the hole Idea even thought she a 9-9 the last time you seen her.
otherwise, you get the room.
I agree. If her ad says In-Call then she provides the room. If her ad says Outcall that means that the hobbyist(Client) provides the room.
If it's your usual hooker, you're investing $60 for BBFS and $40 for a motel on Grand River. That's probably only two days pay for you so go for it
an incall she provides the room. If the room is only for your date then it's on you... but you must not leave her in possesion of a room in your name! It becomes complicated if she needs you to advance the money for the room... because there's always the risk of a cash & dash. It is preferable for you to let her obtain the room even if you reimburse her in cash once you arrive in the room.
Something like this happened to me in Philly. I contacted her and requested incall, she screened me and we set a date. Her website did say she would get a hotel for Philly incalls. Ended up having to move the date because she said that hotels were really expensive on that date. Had the appointment on the new date and it was awesome.
I guess that is B. But, if you don't trust her ripmany, maybe you shouldn't have the appointment. I at least contacted a highly reviewed escort so I trusted her