I look at is to see if they are on P411.  If they’re not I immediately move on.

Service menu/looks vs price

I am good with just about anybody as long as they are not old, fat, ugly, or  a trannie.  I have friends in all four of these categories, but they are not the kind of friends I have sex with.   You could say I have no prejudices when it comes to women, but my dick does.   Lol

I start with a picture that gives me a boner. It could be due to a pose, general looks, some reminder of a past infatuation, etc. Then I filter by price and review.

1) Am I attracted to her?
2) Are we a good match? (personality, services offered, etc)
3) Can I afford her?
4) Can I verify her?
5) Is her verification method inside my comfort zone?

I look for a flat, fit tummy, narrow hips (or anything but something one might call womanly or wide hips) great BBBJ skills and the willingness to at least attempt to handle a magnum. The ability to handle a pretty active two hour session is also a requirement.  

 
And, yes, I am fully aware of just how politically incorrect that body type preference is. But I’ve been an endurance athlete for decades. I tend to prefer women at least close to the female version of the same body type as me and the female endurance athletes I have dated and continue to lust after.  

 
Still, I recognize that the above is just rationalization. But, really, as long as I’m paying, I don’t think I should have to care about political correctness.

1. Am I sexually attracted to her? (usually go for curvy + providers with big tits but I’ve been sexually attracted to non curvy providers and or providers that don’t have big tits)

2. Is she in my budget? (I have a max per hour in mind. It’s increased a couple of times. It’s served me well)

3. Is there a (large) deposit needed? (Last new lady I saw required a deposit, but it was only $50 so I had no problem with it. But otherwise, due to issues on the other end, I’ve learned not to pay deposits)

4. Are her screening methods too invasive? (If she needs ID, she ain’t for me)  

5. Services offered (GFEish. I’ve seen ladies that don’t offer bbbj. Still had a great time so I don’t necessarily need that. But I like GFE)

6. Decent reviews. (They don’t need to be 10/10 but at the same time, I’m not trying to see someone that barely lays there)

That’s all I can think of right now.

and furthermore, attractiveness is only part of the equation.  

 
Attitude and demeanor make up a much larger part of the package, though admittedly those are sort of hard to size up without first meeting the person, though there are clues that come across  via her marketing as well as if she posts on the boards, etc.   Photos reveal a lot about a person.   I'm always kind of impressed with my ability to pick up on certain signals that have led to a very good ratio of hits vs. misses.

 
And, sadly, affordability is also a factor as we live in a material world.

on the flip side, pierced nipples have, to date, been a deal breaker.

...main litmus test that i always demand....that the provider im seeing.....IS a woman.....i love small tits btw

Natural firm breasts, definitely no to the pancakes. Must have TER review or somebody recommended. Occasionally, I'll TOFTT, but pretty much stopped that during the pandemic when the issue wasn't service, but looks. Before, especially with K-agency girls, you'd get - at minimum - a fairly attractive K-girl and the issue would be service. But, it became pretty bad with fat, ugly, and old providers in the K-agency/K-girl scene, that I abandoned that practice.

P411 helps, but if no TER review, then I skip.

 I'll date rubenesque girls as long as they carry it well. Lucy Milano is a favorite of mine. But I favor apple bottom, flat stomach. Cute face is far more important than body shape, though.

 
Hairy pussy is a non-starter. At most, landing strip, but prefer clean shaven.

...attraction has to be the first item on the list.

Her menu must be essentially GFE, with BBBJ being primary (CBJ is a deal breaker).

And reviews (recent with a history of similar input) should confirm.

But before I almost exclsuively went for Asian agencies because most accept anonymity...  

it would be online presence. If I see an ad or whatever, Google your number and come up with zero reputable reviews, presence or a half-assed site, it's a complete no-go.  

 
If we are going by established providers, then anyone that might be a service queen or someone open to some kinky sex, I'm most likely in. My appearance range is fairly lax, especially if you're a service queen. Still, it is not without limits. Big girls need love too, but if you're linebacker size or worse, defensive lineman size, you're out of my range. If you're a meth/c/ron head, I will not want to see you either. Most girls put "party" when its not just weed they be using, so it's a bit of a stopword for me.  

 
If you have a few bad service reviews and are said to be a dead fish more than once, I will likely not see you no matter how good the looks. I'm looking forward to a hot mutual session and a good fuck with a willing participant, not passive or disinterested person. If anything, a good looking woman who can't or doesn't want to fuck, will make me much disappointed than an average looking woman who is average at fucking.

1. no tatoo
2. no silicon
3. no short hair, boy cut or bald head
4. not fat
5. less than 30 yrs
6. cute face
7. minimum 2 positive reviews in the past month