TER General Board

I am way too lazy to post a link, but
LuciusApuleius 28 Reviews 1505 reads
posted
1 / 48

In a thread below a dispute evolved over whether (basically) a woman who was in her 40s but looked in her 30s  was a complement.  I don't want to rehash the debate but I just watched Bull Durham.  Susan Sarandon was 42 when she played that role and they didn't try to make her look younger.  She looked late 30s early 40s.  But God Damn did she look sexy.

Yes age is a factor, I doubt she is as attractive to me now as she was then.   But age isn't everything.  I would take Susan Sarandon at 42 over 99% of the women (even "better" looking women) in the world.  

There is something more than just physical beauty that comes from within that adds to physical beauty and transcends it.

Zangari 812 reads
posted
2 / 48

Posted By: LuciusApuleius
I just watched Bull Durham.  Susan Sarandon was 42 when she played that role...But God Damn did she look sexy.   I would take Susan Sarandon at 42 over 99% of the women (even "better" looking women) in the world.
 Sarandon is an excellent actress, but I've never considered her beautiful--even when she was young like in Rocky Horror (Dammit Janet!).   But there are a few older actresses who can steal the show with sheer erotic allure.  I'm thinking of Jane Seymour in Wedding Crashers (call me Kitty-Kat!).   I think JS was 50+ in that film & I would've definitely fucked that hot kitty, lol.   --z



-- Modified on 3/1/2015 10:44:02 PM

mrfisher 108 Reviews 574 reads
posted
3 / 48

But sexiness comes from the soul. Those are the gals I love, and I'm blessed to have found so many on here.

DateJessicaK See my TER Reviews 774 reads
posted
4 / 48

and she is HOT!

Posted By: LuciusApuleius
In a thread below a dispute evolved over whether (basically) a woman who was in her 40s but looked in her 30s  was a complement.  I don't want to rehash the debate but I just watched Bull Durham.  Susan Sarandon was 42 when she played that role and they didn't try to make her look younger.  She looked late 30s early 40s.  But God Damn did she look sexy.  
   
 Yes age is a factor, I doubt she is as attractive to me now as she was then.   But age isn't everything.  I would take Susan Sarandon at 42 over 99% of the women (even "better" looking women) in the world.  
   
 There is something more than just physical beauty that comes from within that adds to physical beauty and transcends it.
-- Modified on 3/2/2015 7:09:17 AM

lopaw 29 Reviews 759 reads
posted
5 / 48

...and when I'm in the clubs I usually chase after the 18-25yo group. This gal was pretty in a GND way. Even in the dark lighting I could see that she was older than all of the other dancers, but she sat down with me and we began to chat, and her inner beauty and amazing personality shown thru. I wound up dropping a good amount of money on her in VIP. After she left me, I had several of the (much) younger dancers approach me and ask if I enjoyed my dances with grandma!!! The bitter jealousy that those younger dancers exhibited made them very ugly to me, so I declined their dance offerings. I hope that "grandma" will be there the next time I'm there so that I can see her again :)

GaGambler 659 reads
posted
6 / 48

but ugly goes clean to the bone" lol

Sorry guys, but I have to disagree. Call me a shallow pig, but what most of you are doing is to point out the extreme exceptions to the rule. First off, I did not find Susan Sarandon the least bit attractive in that role, and secondly although there are a few 40+ knockouts in the world, by and large once a woman reaches even 30 their bodies, faces, skin, start to show some wear and tear.

IMO, for every attractive 40 year old, I can show you an even more attractive 25 year old, simply by digging up a picture of the same woman 15 years earlier. lol

This of course is strictly my opinion, others are free to disagree, and I am sure MANY of you will do so. lol

lumbermanxxx 681 reads
posted
7 / 48

was 46 when she did the Thomas Crown Affair, take a look at that movie, i'll take her at 46!!!  She is 61 now but I haven't seen her lately..

Posted By: LuciusApuleius
In a thread below a dispute evolved over whether (basically) a woman who was in her 40s but looked in her 30s  was a complement.  I don't want to rehash the debate but I just watched Bull Durham.  Susan Sarandon was 42 when she played that role and they didn't try to make her look younger.  She looked late 30s early 40s.  But God Damn did she look sexy.  
   
 Yes age is a factor, I doubt she is as attractive to me now as she was then.   But age isn't everything.  I would take Susan Sarandon at 42 over 99% of the women (even "better" looking women) in the world.  
   
 There is something more than just physical beauty that comes from within that adds to physical beauty and transcends it.

bigguy30 768 reads
posted
8 / 48

They are more experienced and really know how to please a man!

So yes younger providers are also nice to have fun with at times.

Just for me it's something about a woman with experience.
 
Posted By: LuciusApuleius
In a thread below a dispute evolved over whether (basically) a woman who was in her 40s but looked in her 30s  was a complement.  I don't want to rehash the debate but I just watched Bull Durham.  Susan Sarandon was 42 when she played that role and they didn't try to make her look younger.  She looked late 30s early 40s.  But God Damn did she look sexy.  
   
 Yes age is a factor, I doubt she is as attractive to me now as she was then.   But age isn't everything.  I would take Susan Sarandon at 42 over 99% of the women (even "better" looking women) in the world.  
   
 There is something more than just physical beauty that comes from within that adds to physical beauty and transcends it.

rainy_days 729 reads
posted
9 / 48

Perhaps their rarity is part of what makes them so appealing. I agree that many don't take care of themselves and "go to seed", but when you come across those that do, it's really striking. Personally I've always been more attracted to older women. In general they seem to be more unselfish, understanding, and patient.

Posted By: GaGambler
but ugly goes clean to the bone" lol

Sorry guys, but I have to disagree. Call me a shallow pig, but what most of you are doing is to point out the extreme exceptions to the rule. First off, I did not find Susan Sarandon the least bit attractive in that role, and secondly although there are a few 40+ knockouts in the world, by and large once a woman reaches even 30 their bodies, faces, skin, start to show some wear and tear.

IMO, for every attractive 40 year old, I can show you an even more attractive 25 year old, simply by digging up a picture of the same woman 15 years earlier. lol

This of course is strictly my opinion, others are free to disagree, and I am sure MANY of you will do so. lol

GaGambler 618 reads
posted
10 / 48

It's also a VERY accurate one to take as well. lol

MasterZen 33 Reviews 510 reads
posted
11 / 48

Physical beauty is plentiful, but attractiveness is much more rare.

Imagine being given a beautifully wrapped gift, only to find it is empty inside. Or a gift wrapped in old newspapers that is so beautiful it makes you weep.  

Attractiveness is much more than physical beauty, and age is but a number.  

Make no apologies for what (who) you find attractive

Jboyes 74 Reviews 601 reads
posted
12 / 48

Usually older women Have confidence without arrogance.  That is a very sexy quality.  I'd take a 40 something over a 20 something any day.  

Posted By: LuciusApuleius
In a thread below a dispute evolved over whether (basically) a woman who was in her 40s but looked in her 30s  was a complement.  I don't want to rehash the debate but I just watched Bull Durham.  Susan Sarandon was 42 when she played that role and they didn't try to make her look younger.  She looked late 30s early 40s.  But God Damn did she look sexy.  
   
 Yes age is a factor, I doubt she is as attractive to me now as she was then.   But age isn't everything.  I would take Susan Sarandon at 42 over 99% of the women (even "better" looking women) in the world.  
   
 There is something more than just physical beauty that comes from within that adds to physical beauty and transcends it.

JackDunphy 669 reads
posted
13 / 48

A women's peak is approx 21,22 to about 28 or so. After 28, 29, and almost certainly over 30, major changes set in and it goes rapidly downhill from there.

What you are describing is the "famous effect" i.e. a women's beauty gets magnified simply because she is on tv, in the movies, etc. that British nanny on trial a few years ago was a perfect example of that. Below average looking girl but she was on tv everyday and dumbass dudes hearts all went a flutter.  

Reese Whitherspoon is another one. She's "ok" looking, nothing special. She is today's version of Meg Ryan, another very average looking women vaulted to hot status by silly dudes who can't see past her fame.

Since many women that hook here are over 30, and some even over 40, coupled with the fact that there are tons of BSU candidates here, we tend to get all the "beauty is skin deep" crap.  

Gimme an unknown 25 year old hottie over an ancient Susan Sarandon every day of the week. Even back when she was in Bull Shit Durham. Lol.

GaGambler 502 reads
posted
14 / 48

I bet you IRL, she wouldn't get so much as a six from me.

There are hundreds of $300 hookers that I have seen that are much hotter than she is at her present age. So rather than drool over a "6" that I will never even meet, I'll take any one of hundred of 8's that I can book any day of the week on TER or P 411.

HarryWotton 11 Reviews 646 reads
posted
15 / 48

I mean, would someone say, 'yes, she looks good for 45, I would fuck her, but if she were really 30, then she would look too old for 30, so, no, I would not fuck her.'    Huh?  A woman either does it for me or not, age has absolutely nothing to do with it.

I will admit that my bias is not to go for too young and it really does not have anything to do with the standard line of whether we have things in common or not, because really, you can have good sex with someone you have nothing in common with, it has more to do with feeling like a perv. (the preceding notwithstanding, yes, I do like it when I have something in common with a partner, and yes, I do sometimes go for a little under 25, I am just stating generalities, not that anybody really gives a fuck)

JackDunphy 577 reads
posted
16 / 48

To our boy Aldo. He is fkin everywhere these days.

JackDunphy 530 reads
posted
17 / 48

Much like a kamikaze seconds after impact.

If she is so hot, what's with all the air brushing in the photo you provided?

True beauty needs no such alterations.

GaGambler 492 reads
posted
18 / 48

I might have to deduct another point after seeing her undressed, but by this pic, I stand by my earlier statement and rate her a 6. Attractive enough not to be ashamed of, but hardly anything to rave about.

We just have different standards, there is no shame in simply accepting that my 6 is your 9.9. lol

MrTwister 3 Reviews 494 reads
posted
19 / 48

Says a guy probably in his 60's....

If you were 30-40 years younger you would be more exposed to 20-something's and their sense of themselves and their confidence might not strike you as arrogant. You feel more comfortable around your own 'kind' so you feel more at ease with their version of confidence. It's no different.  

And for the record, I also don't find Susan Sarandon attractive, now or ever. Blech.

JackDunphy 391 reads
posted
20 / 48

But he is not alone in falling for bogus pics. I just would have thought with all the time here and knowing this game he wouldn't have been so hopped up to post an altered pic and spooge about it.

On second thought....Maybe he doesn't know this game very well?

89Springer 529 reads
posted
21 / 48

Cher is the only woman I've ever seen who looked better at 65 than at 20. At 20 she had thin lips, no pronounced cheekbones, average-looking eyes, and no boobs. Amazing what a couple of mil in plastic surgery will do. ;

GaGambler 471 reads
posted
22 / 48

Tens are VERY difficult to get out of me.

Ten is supposed to be virtually perfect, or at least a score that cannot be improved upon, and there is ALWAYS someone hotter right around the corner.

JackDunphy 445 reads
posted
23 / 48

Another post or two and you'll be telling us she's overrated. LOL.

Maybe it depends on which eye you use to look at her?

GaGambler 411 reads
posted
24 / 48

Off the top of my head, a young Jessica Alba would qualify as a solid 9 on the GaGa scale.

Ok, even at her "old age" of 33, she might still rate a 9. lol

GaGambler 597 reads
posted
25 / 48

Not all 30 year olds look 30, and not all 40 year old look 40. My last "age appropriate" GF looked easily ten years younger than her true age, and routinely got carded until about 35.

I will agree that I also have a hard time paying a compliment that I don't believe, I suppose I would make a lousy hooker for that reason.

GaGambler 305 reads
posted
26 / 48

and that would be her "glam" pics in her youth.

The good news is, you don't have to be "hot" to be a great actress. Just look at Meryl Streep, I can't see her ever being more than a 5 at her best either. Maybe a four if we are going to be honest about it.

GaGambler 508 reads
posted
27 / 48

but I doubt if any of the guys who aren't into old broads haven't at least tried an old broad or two before reaching their conclusion.

I have fucked several old broads, and reached the conclusion that I like younger women MUCH better than old ones. I do of course reserve the right to change my mind at any time of my choosing, but for the foreseeable future I don't plan on seeing many women much over about 35 tops.

That should be good news for the rest of you, as one less guy who likes OTHFBC members, is one less guys competing for their affections. lol

JohnyComeAlready 602 reads
posted
28 / 48

Theres no way around it, personally I can't pay a compliment that I can't believe. No other factors apply.

Posted By: LuciusApuleius
In a thread below a dispute evolved over whether (basically) a woman who was in her 40s but looked in her 30s  was a complement.  I don't want to rehash the debate but I just watched Bull Durham.  Susan Sarandon was 42 when she played that role and they didn't try to make her look younger.  She looked late 30s early 40s.  But God Damn did she look sexy.  
   
 Yes age is a factor, I doubt she is as attractive to me now as she was then.   But age isn't everything.  I would take Susan Sarandon at 42 over 99% of the women (even "better" looking women) in the world.  
   
 There is something more than just physical beauty that comes from within that adds to physical beauty and transcends it.

MrTwister 3 Reviews 427 reads
posted
29 / 48

She's a 5 at best. And this is her 'out on the town' look. She would be a 3 after cracking the blinds on a Sunday morning. Now I dislike Susan Sarandon even more.

Posted By: RodTidweLL
I thought she was known for being a good looking lady with a busty frame and down to earth, hence the cigars and liquorthing in Bull Durham.  
   
 I think a down to eearth lady looks more attractive to everyone. Her daughters the same way, not a model but pretty and busty.

JohnyComeAlready 516 reads
posted
30 / 48

Maybe it's just me? I can usually tell what age a person is. I go by more than just looks.

HarryWotton 11 Reviews 617 reads
posted
31 / 48

I agree with your conclusion, Susan Sarandon never did anything for me, and for the life of me, I can't figure out why Reese Witherspoon is supposed to be hot.  Now, Meg Ryan, she may not have been a traditional beauty, but her personality just made her shine.

However, what's that stuff about women peaking in their 20s?   There are women who look darned good well into their 50s without the aid of a scalpel.    Really, no need to be a BSU candidate, beauty transcends age, at least for some people.   Then there is the sexual aspect, I would argue that women don't peak until their late 30s and 40s.    Then again, for guys who only fuck 18 to 25 year olds, you would not know that :)

GaGambler 602 reads
posted
32 / 48

but I doubt the patient will survive, which I suppose is ok too. lol

russbbj 89 Reviews 495 reads
posted
34 / 48

I'd drag my balls over 2 miles of broken beer bottles just to lay where she pissed last.

Seriously though, she is wow, yummy, humina humina. Sexiest, most beautiful woman alive of any age, as far as I'm concerned. That's my opinion, I didn't charge you for it, and that's what it's worth.

Senator.Blutarsky 502 reads
posted
35 / 48

This young lady rates a 10 IMHO...

Senator.Blutarsky 712 reads
posted
36 / 48

...you wouldn't be related, would you?

floyd1039 10 Reviews 461 reads
posted
37 / 48

The only stripper that really got me going danced "for me" to this song. After that she would sit with me and talk and stuff, not hustling me but still working the floor. Good time with a 39 year old that many consider over the hill but she made the most of any of the gals on day shift and was not bitchy with the other dancers.
Last timei went, she was gone and I was invisible. their loss.

Senator.Blutarsky 473 reads
posted
38 / 48

She's had so much plastic surgery, it looks like she's wearing a mask.

89Springer 560 reads
posted
39 / 48

Didn't you just offer to drag your balls over broken glass for some other chick last week?  

Do you have that many favorite women, or do you just like dragging your balls on broken glass? ;)

inicky46 61 Reviews 564 reads
posted
44 / 48
GaGambler 480 reads
posted
45 / 48

I would drag his balls over broken glass to be able to fuck her as well. lol

but would I pay over five hundred bucks??? That's a much harder question. Well actually a better question would be, "would I pay over five hundred bucks to fuck a woman who looked just like her, but wasn't famous?" Getting a shot at a celebrity would be worth a lot more just for bragging rights, even if it's a woman you don't find breathtaking. Unless that celebrity is someone like Rosie Odonnell of course. lol

As.Good.as.It.Gets 633 reads
posted
46 / 48

Care to share her info? Name. club, schedule, etc. You can PM me if you feel more comfortable that way.

89Springer 394 reads
posted
47 / 48
hotplants 479 reads
posted
48 / 48

Is she a cyborg? Seriously, she looks like her brain has been scooped out of her head, leaving nothing behind but some weirdly vacant glass eyes.  

And some people say men have unrealistic expectations about women's physical appearance.......

Register Now!