Although I think it is usually inappropriate for a provider to review a client, there are exceptions. Here is an example of a highly appropriate counter-review of a client.
Yikes!
I soon as I saw it was more than 3 words and they weren't all "LOL", I knew it wasn't about me.
I just thought the guy left alot out of his review....That he should of told....
Chay
I hope I was not wrong posting my side of it
Not just the obvious hygene and insensitivity issues with the fellow but his writing out of anger and frustration. His feelings are understandable but expressing them in an unhealthy way hurt Chay's biz and probably her feelings. His anger probably comes from hurt as well but since he expressed it in a somewhat misguided & public way, Chay's reaction comes off as healthy and thought out.
Love,
Dr. David Viscott.
That is why I waited to post my reply....I wanted to post it when I was not upset....But I just wanted people to know my side of it
Chay
-- Modified on 2/6/2005 9:39:45 PM
I can't see how an intelligent feller is gonna waste a lot of time wondering about you...just dreaming about you.
Thank you...I know I should not worry but this is my reviews are my pride and joy....
Chay
-- Modified on 2/6/2005 9:39:25 PM
...as I always show up for my appointments freshly showered, shaved, brushed, flossed, etc.
lol Lex, don't forget to take off your Depends undergarment before hand too!!!!
...please pay attention. Oh, nevermind. Go sit in the corner instead. Off you go now.
I've always felt that providers should be allowed a one to two line rebuttal on reviews to be fair. Too often a one sided review can hurt a provider unnecessarily. Sounds like this was a bad match from the beginning and knowing Chay certainly an isolated instance where I'm more inclined to believe her story than his.
Some guys and even some women have very poor touching and kissing skills for some reason. One would think its a natural thing but thats really not the case.Once met a woman that put her tongue so far down my throat during DFK it damned near choked me to death.
Sometimes when a lady comes on the board to defend herself against a bad review, she draws more attention to that review than if she had left it alone, to quietly die.
And I think providing too many details of the encounter is an invasion of her privacy and the client's. She could have simply said the guy was late, hadn't showered, and was too rough with her. Everyone would have understood then why she didn't provide her usual GFE experience. We don't need to know that he sucked her breasts too hard and he was lousy at DATY.
A well-regarded lady once came on my regional board to defend a bad review. She provided too many intimate details, plus she made the mistake of saying she was turned off at the beginning by his appearance--he was unattractive and had bad teeth.
She got some flak about dissing the guy's appearance, and had to later come on to apologize.
I'd be led to believe that he was dangerious. This fellow isn't dangerous. He's a nipple chomper. I like a good nipple chomper, personally, but Chay doesn't.
What Chay did could've backfired, I guess. Neither of them said anything excessively bad about the other one except the guys's review saying those dangerous words "rip off". They both need to take 50% of the heat for the failure of the date.