questioning whether a tree makes a sound when it falls in an empty forest. If everyone ignored JCA's postings, and never responded to them, would that mean they were never made?

Let me rephrase your question. If JCA were in the forest, completely alone, and the tree known as TTT were to fall on him, crushing him to death. If there were nobody to hear his death scream, would that mean that he never screamed in the first place? And secondly, would anyone even care?lmao

I call slomo.

Would JCA file a restraining order against the tree to keep it from talking?   What if JCA had two brain cells instead of one?  What then.?

Measurement of jca will be quite small though....  

Is stupid fair?  Did stupid exist before smart?  Nobody wants to be stupid, but what if nobody wanted to be smart?  Would that be fair?

You won't find him talking about fairness anywhere on this board.  

Instead of that nutty nonsense... What are you even talking about?

Would a pot be fair if it wasn't as black as kettle?  

... but I didn't think there could possibly be a thread that would make me rather read the one below -- at least not until I read where this one's going.

TTT  would be busy asking the tree when it fell.  
JCA would be questioning if it's fair for the tree to have fallen.  

Or anyone else on the board?

I was trying to mimic the stupidity of your posting style, but I guess I didn't dumb myself down enough.

I'd thought about suggesting that nobody respond to him, but it won't happen. His posts are so outrageous that there will be some who just can't resist firing back. He's like that car wreck that people need to look at as they drive by

"I hate Mondays" as a racial epithet towards black americans?

Posted By: Drunken Asian

Would a pot be fair if it wasn't as black as kettle?  
   
 The more I think about it,  I think pot and kettle are just as unfair as sex.  
 What an unfair world we live in.    
   
 I think it's time we filed a restraining order against the world. That would make things fair.

When did I say that?

I guess maybe you are not "poor and stupid" enough to emulate JCA. lmao

one is wealthy, brilliant and has an 8-inch cock as thick as a baby's arm. LMAO!

and morals slightly higher than Charles Manson. lmao

Honestly, he's such an attention whore that he'd probably bail if we all quit responding to him.

Do you know what I am saying

Was this the undercard?

I wanted to meet him for lunch last fall. After that he took a hiatus from posting.

That's grounds for banning on TER.

Steph

Johny "Butters" The Boy Pimp used to be King of the World.
But here he's Bottom Bitch.

Every stick needs its piñata.

Slip on a banana peal?

if I met him in "Charm City."
But then again, the poster above you also threatened a member with physical harm only a couple of months ago.  So it's another Pot=Kettle=Black situation.  No offense.

Or at least claiming to. lol

At the moment he says he's not responding to our posts.  I could care less.  it's that much less stupidity clogging this place up.

Then he'll have morphed into TTT.

In rod we trust,  the guy who's always right about everything with 100% certainty.  lol

But now it seems as if trees are the new bytes.

Sympathized with the the abusers or blamed the victims.  

LMAO

We all know what really happened, JohnyRapesAlready.  You have a history of bizarre an sometimes frightening posts that have put everyone off, but especially creeped out the women here, who are already at enough risk from creepezoids like you.  So Tobi, among many others, reacted.  And you couldn't handle it and started stalking her and calling names.
And now you're blaming your victim?
Priceless.

Hint, Hint?

if he's got the PM I want to see it.

Posted By: MatureGFE

That's grounds for banning on TER.

Steph

he's not a nitwit.  He's a Tidwit!

It was creepy.

It's "tidwit" not "nitwit"  do I have to teach you everything?

besides don't you know that the dog eats all of the Turdmeister's homework, err I mean PM's . lol

I never blamed anyone, and asked how did two YW end up with a pimp?

Some one mentioned offer that service here on the GD board.

When he refused to comprehend the most basic of posts, after his constant nagging for attention.

How am I supposed to post a pulled thread?

You still have your pulled threads in your message board posts. You are being dishonest.

I was inquiring about eye socket sex, after you posted about that, it sounds interesting.

You called the scenario of the gang rape a "fiction," when you have no idea whether it was true or not.  I guess it makes you feel better that you said what you did regarding a "fiction," but you fail to see it never mattered. You expressed a belief, sympathized with the pimp and blamed the victims.
The fact that you don't know or care if the situation was real or not has no, zip, nada, bearing on your amoral attitude.  Said attitude has been reinforced by your posts since then.  Bottom line: you are a wack-job who's potentially dangerous.  No woman would see you if you revealed your handle to them during clearance and you know it.

With a rapist... and I think you said the gang rape never took place.

In the case of JCA, I will stick with ridicule.  If his "universe" ever changes, and he stops posting like a drunk writing fortune cookie messages, I might reconsider my treatment of him. "MIGHT"

That post has been put up again within the past few weeks, so stop asking anyone to show it to you again. And I never said the gang rape never took place.  You said you didn't believe it did and I said I didn't care if it did nor didn't, your reaction was despicable and amoral either way.
You are truly tedious.  I'm done debating rape threads with you, maggot.

You're the one who keeps changing your handle to escape what you said. I just repeated the exact names I called you, and I stand by that 100%. You are a cancer and I hope that no lady ever has to be subjected to your creepy ass again. The funny thing is, had you just said "look, I'm sorry, I wasn't trying to blame the victims and my eyes have been opened to the fact that they weren't responsible for what happened to them," we all would have let it go. The problem is that you keep bringing it up AND trying to defend what you said! Not only that, you've now escalated it to stalking my posts to call me crazy and talk about how you wish you knew my real name. And apparently you're now posting ISOs referencing my posts. I used to think that you were just dumb and creepy. I'm now convinced that you are dangerous.  

and the fact that you were thinking about what she said DAYS before that was not even related to you until you did your thing, yet again, at 3am is creepy.


And please don't say "she started it" it's sooo 3rd grade.

Meant it or not.  

I don't take their hypothetical stories seriously.

Copy & post your original response from that thread.

He's at least a sixth grader.

-- Modified on 7/22/2014 12:22:45 PM

When Hound put up that post he did so out of shame and received a huge amount of shit.  He never tried to defend himself and he was the one who was actually responsible (assuming you don't believe like JohnyRapeExcuser the whole thing never happened).
And what happened with Hound? His contrition was accepted and now he posts without catching any crap.  Of course, Hound was always likable before that post, while JohnyRapeObsessor was already considered a goon.

I was looking for honest answers to honest questions.

...but it doesn't show where I sympathized with any on... at all.

What agitated me the most was Tobi's snide remark about "hoping the thread stays up".

That would be you.

the person posting wasn't being fed and would eventually go away

Quit trying to backpedal. You asked me specifically to post MY words on that thread. How in the fuck am I supposed to get your posts from a thread that was deleted?  

He has admitted he sometimes doesn't even know whose post he's commenting on.  So why would he remember he sympathized with a pimp and blamed the raped hookers for their own rape?  He probably doesn't even recall he then renamed himself Pimpathy, which may be the only clever thing he's ever written but says a lot.