There are many design flaws in God's most precious creation that he being a supreme or "perfect" being could have worked out in the manufacturing process.
We got hair on portions of our bodies that we don't need or want.
Everything we crave to eat rots our teeth, clogs our arteries or gives us diabetes.
We're given instincts that are the polar opposite of everything in his fuck'n rule book(s).
By time we've "figured it out" were too old and feeble to enjoy or make good use of it.
"Intelligent design"? MY ASS.
and cite women as attractive nuisances...
I'd fucking make a point on his head, too. Almost all states have sanctions for frivolous lawsuits, and I can think of 2 good reasons to nail this mofo right now, (1) the dfdt probably has to be a legal person or association, and I'd like to see this idiot establish that; and (2) when he can't serve his dfdt, lots of courts will dismiss with sanctions for failure to serve promptly. So I want to hear how he expects to serve God.
You politician assholes want to make a point, eh? Get out your checkbook, I'm gonna make my own point.
The fact is that it is one hell of a lot cheaper and better idea to let any schlub pay $320 to file his handwritten bitch than to let the clerk - who has god knows what issues - tell him nobody's gonna listen to his shit.
That's what judges are paid to do, is listen to people's pathetic petty ass problems, and it's one hell of a lot cheaper way to resolve issues than firefights.
Of course it's frivolous. Maybe if he sues god and wins, we can get past all of these religious discussions that lead to wars, and whether we can wish people merry christmas.
I guess I don't think that this is high on the list of stupid things our government wastes money on.
Seriously, the Church claims to represent God on earth, and they claim that each of their buildings is "God's House," so why not serve the papers at the dude's place of residence? Note that the Catholic Church is unbelievably rich. I'm talking RICH! They own a building in like half the towns and neighborhoods in this country, plus a stake in virtually every large-cap and mid-cap publicly traded company on earth. Not to mention all the gold and artifacts in the Vatican. The wealth of the Church, if it could ever be calculated, probably approaches the trillion-dollar mark. So a judgement would be easy to collect, right?
If you think the Catholics are rich (which they are), you should see how wealthy the Mormons are. In classic lawsuit fashion, why not sue god by all of his(her) names. Somebody is bound to roll over to avoid publicity, and with the bankrolls these folks play with, a couple million could be considered a nuisance suit.
Now that I think of it, I should sue the Catholics myself, for all of that guilt they spewed at me as a child. Maybe I could make the claim that they're the cause of my hobbying. Calculating past & future expenses, that could reach the millions. OK, mostly future, based upon the settlement, but still.
you don't sue God dba Roman Catholic Church, 700 Club, etc; you sue each & all of them as individual defendants - eg Roman Catholic Church aka Pope, God, Father-Son&HG and maybe a couple thousand orders as Does.
Now the problem here is that they're gonna deny responsibility for natural disasters, but here we have Pat Robertson claiming to know that GOd is gonna do these things on account of that we don't bust enough fairies' balls, so it sounds to me like he knows something about this, and is probably some kind of co-conspirator - don't you think?
So there's counts for what, waste & conversion of property, & battery against the people?
So then you toss in some fraud counts in the alternative, that some doofuses acted in reliance on Robertson's advice, so that when he denies knowing anything about these natural disasters, then you have him on the fraud.
Yeah, I'd settle for maybe 10% the value of Robertson's assets. I could live on a third of that for a while.
But I don't think you're gonna stick the Catholics unless some of them stuck you. They're too savvy.
I'm just happy to have a convert. Ooh, I hope that doesn't make me a crusader. That could put me on the wrong end of the lawsuit.
the Catholics have been around long enough to figure it out, unlike televangelists, and I suspect they have all their buku $$ in the names of different orders, each one with minimal net worth, and there's no way you're gonna talk them into being God's attorney-in-fact. They're smart enough to shrug their shoulders and blow smoke.
But some of these televangelists really believe their own line of shit, and/or figure they can always go into bankruptcy (ie legal as well as moral). So you might find somebody with the chutzpah to accept service...
So a claim of a few MM in pedopophile judgments can put a diocese in bankruptcy, because they're smart enough to have already got most of their assets in serious hock.
Debtor-in-possession is the way to be, I guess.
Two vicodin and a STIFF martini. Ketel One should do the trick...
before you get behind some politician with some clever theatrical trick, think a little about what's going on.
What he is advocating, and you are endorsing, is that the court clerk decides who can file. I don't think that you'd like the results of what you're endorsing. You think you have a bitch now, wait until you get your way.
So if that came in front of me, I would treat it EXACTLY as if it were NOT a politician who filed to make a theatrical point - that is, I'd sanction his ass into next week for filing something that he knew was obvious bullshit. Put that on your blog and smoke it.
I don't agree with what he's doing, I think he's a loon. Sorry that didn't come through for you.
I have no blog
It might have something to do with the fact that you resort to name calling with anyone who disagrees with you, but on this subject at least, I agree with you completely.
people can't throw the 1st punch & think nobody's gonna swing back. Because your target might want to cover all possibilities that you aren't gonna swing again.
Jacko, I agreed with you on this one subject, let's leave it at that.
The devil made me do it.
(still not a lawyer)
hahahahahaha
Finally, someone puts it in the proper perspective. Heh