Just saw a review by a guy who rates a provider 4/4. But he saw her after four (!) other reviewers had rated her an average of 2.5/2.5 which translates to ugly or homely / should-have-stayed-home or barely-worth-the-effort.  

if it bothers you that much!

Scores... meaningless  

I don't get that either. Then you read some where the guy shows up and its not the girl in the pics or she's bigger than her pics or whatever. Then he says he should have left but he decided to stay.  That's ridiculous because if its not who she's supposed to be then I'm not staying regardless if I'm horny or not. Then again I'm only looking at well reviewed ladies on TER, p411 etc. Some of the reviews I've read its amazing. Some guys will put their dick in anything.  I may be a newbie but I'm not stupid.

.."Of course, some hookers actually like fucking ugly do-nothing assholes. Good for them. Usually go by the title of "cheating husband"...

on both sides?

and complain when there order comes out wrong?

I see this often also, I guess they must be thinking with the little head instead of the big one, also they must be a dumbass.

It's always fun to see people buy low end shit and act surprised that it really is low end shit  LOL

Or are you just projecting again?

Is that kind of like farmers hating bees? [Deconstruction: the source of their livelihood] Seems we have had sufficient threads to lay out some good reasons why husbands may stray.

I think she ah hates men. I don't know how she's stayed so long in this business hating those who pay her. Its really kind of sad I say

I've never cheated with a hooker.

a website called The Erotic REVIEW?

More precisely I like to sample escorts.

While I am not guilty of the OP I will say that not all of us have money to burn. I would love to see some of the higher priced ladies in my area, but the truth is many of them won't do what my BP hookers will for a much better rate. I choose not to break myself financially over pussy.

Even someone willing to spend just $200 an hour to be with a lady I find hard to label as cheap by any objective standard

Wanting to save money, or actually enjoying the food at certain places doesn't necessarily make someone "cheap."

-- Modified on 4/14/2015 11:51:06 PM

This topic comes up often on the board. There are actually a lot of reasons why this could happen.
1) Stupidity
2) Even though she has bad reviews, maybe I will have a different result. (see number 1 above)
3) Her pictures are really hottt! (See number 1 above)
4) Little head thinking for the big head (See number 1 above)
5) Guy knows about TER but only uses it after the fact to report bad results, rather than using it beforehand for research.

They just want to get a quick release and don't care. Be thankful the reviews are written so you can avoid.

Still wish there was a Red Lobster in my lil' hood!

you can only read the detailed review and see the scores if you have a VIP membership, which either costs a not insignificant amount of $ or write reviews

I only ate there one time.

I will admit going to a Dollar Store on occasion.  In fact, I found a great deal on some socks that outlasted the $10 ones from Lord and Taylor.  

My only point about this is that there is a price range for everyone, and while cheap may be a bit pejorative, it conveys the message with some oomph.

I'll accept thrifty however if that smooths things over.

And it's cheaper if you pay quarterly or yearly, not to mention you can get it free by reviewing or reporting errors.  I haven't paid for VIP for years.
If you're going to spend even $200 on a hooker, why would you not spend $30 to find out if she's what you want?

High  five, Mr. Fisher!

We simply have to have our envelopes correctly equipped, be well maintained as far as hygiene is concerned, and be respectful.

These guys are the same ones when told at a restaurant, be careful that plate is hot, they turn around and touch the plate.   then shake their hand saying...shit that was hot.