Was reading the reviews FAQ, and I was wondering if that performance score rule is enforced, and still in effect?
From the FAQ:
"An escort provider is only eligible to earn up to a 7, unless she is willing to perform one or some of the following during a session: Kisses With Tongue, Bare-Back Blow Job, Really Bi, and Anal Sex. For each of these services that are offered, her potential max score is raised by one point, with 10 as an absolute maximum."
"If your review rates a provider higher than her maximum score, the score will be adjusted down to her maximum."
So an amazingly satisfying experience from the completely "safe" style escorts with no tongue or BBJ can only be a 7? I can see that possibly, but it seems odd that a girl who does french kiss and everything and does a covered BJ can only get an 8. To me and I'm sure plenty of others, a CBJ is not a drawback, and that experience could easily deserve a 9.
On top of all that, you can only give a 9 if she does anal? I mean, I'm going to assume more hobbyists and escorts don't do it than do it. It seems odd that one particular fetish or preference would be part of the official rules.
And of course the weirdest, if these rules are correct we can only give a girl a 10 if she does all that and is "really-bi"? That can't be correct, can it?
I haven't written a review so far, so I'm just curious. But for example, oddly enough the best experience I ever had was superb can only get a 7, where as a less safe experience which I'd rank a bit lower can get up to a 9. Long story short, I really want to give the safe chick I dig an 8 instead of a 7 if I'm going to post a review.
To be eligible for a score of 8, a provider must offer at least one of the four services mentioned. For a 9, she must offer at least two of the four, and for a 10, she must offer three.
So you're incorrect to say that she must offer anal to be eligible for any score, or that she must be "really bi". She must offer at least one or the other to get a 10, but she can get a 9 without offering either.
Got that?
The rules are usually enforced by the editors, although there seem to be exceptions.
You're correct without offering 1. kiss with tongue 2. bare blow job 3. anal sex 4. be really bi, the provider can not receive a score higher than 7 in performance. However offering any one of those makes her eligible for an 8. Offering any two of those makes her eligible for a 9...any three of them makes her eligible for a 10. Note I said offering not actually doing in the session.
A provider offering a covered blow job and no kissing with tongue could get a 9 if she was really bi and did anal. If one of those two items isn't on the menu then you're right. She gets an 8.
Let me add that you can use the juicy details to make it clear the session was an exceptionally satisfying session regardless of the "menu". Smart guys know this and check out the details. They don't just look at the numbers. You can even state that without the scoring "restraints" you would rate her much higher and proceed to say why.
Generally the rules are adhered to.
Don't get me started on what kind of sense it makes to rate a lady on something that didn't happen but could have.
not mean that you have to partake in them. If is says on her profile that the required services are on her menu, she is eligible for the appropriate score, regardless of whether you get them or not.
Swim
-- Modified on 7/24/2011 5:37:37 PM
the quality of the performance, only whether she does certain things.
That's like rating a movie based on the number of car chase scenes, or explosions, or bloody decapitations, rather than the quality of the acting, directions, script, etc.
Scores are supposed to recognize both quality and "extra" services. Sort of like Best Actor Oscars are given for quality of performance, but you qualify only if you adopt a foreign accent or overcome a disability.
-- Modified on 7/26/2011 2:29:22 PM
Scoring has no sense to me at all. Should be only on the visit and our experience not what will or may happen. Should be removed all from site and other idea put in place.
I think this topic has been debated since the beginning of time and there probably will never be a satisfactory answer. But, IMO the simple approach is probably the most likely to work. "This is what I asked for, this is what we did, this is what she wouldn't do. And for those we did, this is my subjective quality rating. Oh, and while I'm at it, we don't need to regurgitation of ... I called, I drove, I called again, I went to the room, I placed the fee, I got undressed... WTF is all that for anyway?
I have on more then occasion not posted a review because of it. Do you know what, I will only partake in two of the four activities. And the really bi thing only matters if you are a woman, doing a doubles session, or looking for a couples session. Anal and BBBJ up the risks of a session. I don't mind a CBJ. And I do not every kiss on payed dates, nor do I do anal at all.
I have posted in length why I hate TER's numbers and why they are useless. below is a link for those that care, I will not go into them again here.
If I bought TER I would scrap the currant number system all together and replace them with "Are the photos accurate and currant? Yes/No" and "Do you recommend? 1= dangerous, robber, B&S, scam, LE, etc. I highly do not recommend, stay away; 2= I do not recommend; 3= neutral, not for me but you may enjoy; 4= yes; 5= Highly recommend." I really think it would serve everyone better then the joke TER has now.
I truly hate TER's numbers system. I feel it is a wast of band with.