I was trying to post a review about two providers: 1) that literally stood me up for no reason and 2) one that I can honestly say is a complete rip off and can put anyone in danger because of her handling of her business. My first ad was simply unapproved because I did not see that provider (which I think it's bogus taking into consideration I was kept waiting at a hotel for no reason and that should be informed to anyone willing to see her) and the second one was unapproved only because I'm on a basic status and she has no reviews and therefore it was unapproved. The first review I could deal with, but the second one that was unapproved not only is that doing a disservice, but I think bad providers should be expose no matter what's the status of the member or if the provider has no reviews. I mean, does TER understand these bad providers continue to change numbers and pictures and they should be expose each and every single time they are trying to pull a fast one?

being sure that the people they take reviews from and the gals who are reviewed are the real deal, so they will not accept a review if no meeting took place, and they will also hold a review in abeyance if either the reviewer or the reviewee is a first-timer, until they have more information on either or both, depending on circumstances.

I guess their philosophy is that it is better to err on the side of caution and not run a review rather than be embarrassed by a review that turns out to be false.  I can't blame them for taking that stand.

But there is something you can do, which is to post the information about a rip-off or no-show, etc. on your local board and at least warn people who see those posts.  It's better than nothing.