I have had my reviews get rejected by TER because they were too old and think this policy is plain crap. You keep the reviews sitting in the database for a year or two and the members appreciate that because while those old reviews may not reflect the providers current behavior, they help establish her patterns. Plus, that old review may be the ONLY review, or perhaps one of just two. I think you do everyone a disservice with this policy. It would be a different (i.e. more acceptable) thing if you said that the "old" review was accepted and appreciated, but doesn't count towards the VIP membership requirements.
Maybe this issue has already been beaten to death? Sorry, I'm new.
We keep a long term history on a provider to keep track of the history of a certain provider. Submitting a review of a girl you saw a year ago makes it very difficult for us to verify. If it is a bad review, it is unfair to the provider because it is harder to contest. We try to keep the "new" reviews as "new" as possible.
-- Staff
is clouded. So even if the reviewer has good intentions, it is likely that their recall will lead to some inaccuracy.
LC
how can you "verify" a review? You call the provider up for each review submitted? You arbitrarily assume that everyone has short term memory problems? What if I wrote the review 6 months ago, posted it elsewhere and now want to submit here?
Neither of the above responses makes much sense to me. Again, this policy is a disservice to the members here.
Here is a supposedly acceptable review's juicy details on this system. When viewed in the normal way it is all of 3 lines, yet since it is recent, it's OK:
"I had seen her a couple of years ago and she is in better shape now. An ass to die for, no joke. Relaxed and chilled a bit, conversated. Went to the bedroom and it was on. Oral and multiple positions. Another round might have been available, but it was already 1am. Did I mention that ass she has? Incredible. Showered together and a hug goodnight. Will see again. "
A review like this is almost worthless. All it says is that she has a nice ass, which is a confirmation of what I can see in her ad. This belongs in the summary section, not the juicy details section! Yet, if I write a review with a 3000-word juicy details section AND I include the current phone number and URL (easily verifiable from her ad), my review gets rejected!
THAT'S why this policy makes no sense and hurts the users of this site.