...because oddly enough not everyone (myself included) is aware of this board.  As you know, I always have used the suggestion bag.  I hope you like these as I put a lot of time and thought into them.

Set Default
If you were to set the default on the "Ignore Bad Websites" to NO then when we did a search people might find a new ad for when there was a Bad Website from before and then they could report it.  It finally occured to me that when doing my searches.  I even found a couple of Rip-offs that were not showing because the "Ignore Bad Websites" button was set to "Yes".  In the mean time guys, implement this and you will find more info as well as gain the opportunity to bank more credits against your membership for fixing problems.

Adding Picts to Profiles
It would really be cool if you guys could take an image from a providers website and burn the image onto the profile page, as long as it is the real pict.  Perhaps you could place it in the upper right corner.  This would make searches more efficient.  Face it sometimes links expire or the sites go down, this is a nice fail-safe.

Our Favorites Section
It would also be cool if we could search and sort our favorites, as mine is now at around the 160 mark, with over a dozen different cities.  It would be nice if our favorites page listed additional categories such as ratings and ages!  A little picture would rule.

New Ratings System
Can we add 1/2 points to our ratings please?  For the girls that aren't really a solid 8 or 9, but in reality we want to give them a 7.5 or 8.5.  Or how about when we see a girl that is stronger than a 9 but not quite the once in a million 10 and we want to give them a 9.5?  I think this will also lead to more accurate ratings as sometimes we give (or deduct) an extra point in another category to make up for these missing 1/2 points.  I hate to speak blasphemy because they are truly inferior sites (A-Report & BigDoggie) with laughable databanks, but I have seen a 1/2 point rating system on one of them.

More Specific Searches
Also why can't we mark the types we want in our searches and thereby excluding the ones we don't.  Such as - we want every girl that is "skinny", "thin" and "athletic" but we don't want to conduct separate searches.  Also what if we want to search for "bleached" and "blonde" at the same time.  While we are at it, why not put in an approximate weight range as what I might see as athletic another guy might say is thin.  Or what one guy says is "normal" i might see as "baby fat".  In other words the descriptions are too subjective to personal opinion and we would benefit from more precise information.

Inactive Files
Also there are so many great providers and rip-off artists who have disappeared, which can be very valuable information if it was able to appear in our searches.  What if everything in those inactive files came back with the exception of general info and juicy details.  We could still see a link to the websites, personal data, rankings, etc. we just couldn't read the stories.  I speculate that there is some absolute provider gold in those inactive files.  Besides, I never tell girls I saw them on TER and I think no one else should either.  Anyway, please think about this one.

New Section
Oh yeah,  wouldn't it be great to create an ATF forum that is only available to those who staff deems worthy.  People who contribute often and accurately and solve problems with missing phone numbers and links.  This could be a forum where those of us who do these things could benefit from sharing our personal gold with those who have something to give back.  Lets face it almost everyone is holding back now.  When searching the malls at least 90% are completely unreviewed.  If we all provided more information - POSTINGS! - we would all benefit!  Hell, I am at the point now where I am too afraid to see and unreviewed provider and can't find what I am seeking from the ones that are reviewed.  So perhaps the only way to cure this is to create this special section to incentivize TER members to participate more to gain admission to that new ATF board.

I realize that some of these suggestions are radical changes (like the ratings) but if implemented, eventually overtime, the playing field will level out with comparable scores.  I also understand that some of these changes require substantial time on staff's part, but don't we want to continue to improve this kick-ass site, I would hope so.


FP


-- Modified on 7/20/2002 1:30:59 PM