TER should allow repeat reviews by repeat clients.  The failure to do so unfairly penalizes the very finest of providers who have a loyal following of repeat clients.  I suspect that many discriminating hobbyists, like me, use your very valuable performance and other rankings.  It is fair to presume that repeat clients would score a provider on the high end.  Consequently, the performance and other rankings of the truly best providers are skewed downward as a result of the inability of repeat clients to post additional reviews.  This obviously harms the reliability and usefulness of your service.  Please consider making a change.

I totally agree.

That goal could be accomplished by allowing a repeat client to edit a prior review, updating the date and any data that has changed.

Would repat, seperate reviews serve the providers interest or our interest more? That's the important question. TER is here for us - the guys. I don't think that seperate repeat reviews would accomplish anything to help us find good providers. The way things are now is fine.

They would help if they showed a shift, negative or positive, in a provider's service.  What you view as acceptable may not be the same as me, but if you post two reviews, both based on YOUR perception, then I can see if she is better or worse than your previous review.

Repeat reviews would be beneficial because each session is unique and often offers features which the prior reviewed session did not: could be seeing the same girl at her home one time and traveling the next (as I have done with Venus in NYC--her home city--and Boston several times); it could be different activities that you engaged in; it could be a marked improvement or decline in session quality. Also, as originially pointed out, many of us find a couple of escorts we really like and value (for qualilty, friendship, etc.), and I think others would benefit by seeing what it's like to become a regular client and how the session quality reflects the repeat visits. True, multiple reviews would have diminishing returns, but at least two should be allowed.