She will be in San Diego this week end and is a 10+++
-- Modified on 10/17/2001 7:29:51 PM
Coming from someone who rated Skye a 5, while the others rated her a 1, I'd say your rating for Sydney is hard to believe. Besides, why haven't you reviewed her?
I just visited Skye again and I would have to upgrade that 5 rating---not sure why you are having a problem---Sydney is a 10++++
the problem is that history of her being a rip-off. who knows. maybe you are just special and she treats you real good and better than everyone else
Skye is one of the best known ripoffs in San Diego, certainly in the same league as Brigette/Austin/Mandy/Jenny etc. These reports go way back to the long-lamented LAIF/Blue Pond board. Besides the well-known lack of service, there was one report of her changing the billing on a credit slip by ~$600.
When everybody else describes her as a ripoff, then I would have to question the relevance of toutbob's findings.
If you want to upgrade Skye's rating, go ahead. Updates are encouraged by TER.
However, your professed mileage has clearly varied from that of the others. I wouldn't have given her a 5 based on your existing narrative. Anyone who changes the game midstream is bordering on a 1 in my book.
I don't have a problem, I just don't buy in to your opinions thus far. Since you have only a few published reviews, but apparently have seen Candra, Cindy and Sydney without reviewing them, it is hard to calibrate on your perspective. You've provided no information to substantiate a "10+++" rating for an unreviewed provider, as if such a rating is meaningful.
Just my humble opinion.
-- Modified on 10/18/2001 2:59:12 AM
Details! Details!
Someone will!!!
Your messages imply otherwise.
-- Modified on 10/23/2001 7:00:35 PM
Skye is a ripoff. She should confine her "ads" to the fetish category. If you like being humiliated with her on the phone totally ignoring you while you're massaging her, she's the girl for you!
I agree with most reviewers here, at least in spirit, not with Sydney specifically asI have never seen her. I have seen several providers in LA/SD who were rated "8", "9" and "10", only to find out they are way below average in the looks department.
Sure, most of these providers were cool ladies, and did everything you could imagine and maybe more, but if I see a review that says a lady is a "9-Model Material" or "10-One in a Lifetime" - I read the English language to mean just that, a "babe" you see on a magazine cover. Additionally, I see descriptions indicating the lady to be "athletic" or "work out" and expect a "stripper" body style... only to find a flabby chick. Come on!
I know some are going to argue that looks are subjective - yeah, from a "7" to an "8" maybe... but some of these so called "8" and "9" are really "4" or "5" at best. Not only that, why is it that the best looking strippers are the ones making all of the money... yes, there is a universal concept of a good looking lady.
In fact, I can only think of a single provider I saw in LA that looked great like a dancer, and really is an "8" or a "9", but regrettably she is in NY at the moment.
eom
She plays hard to get, and acts like she doesn't need the business. Since she has this premadonna attitude, I'll stick with some of the better channels I already have.
She expects to "verify" you by calling other providers you have seen that openly advertise... as if the other providers would remember you by your real name or would appreciate being called by a "competitor" in the first place... what an idiot!
Actually, I remember at least one provider who requested names of other providers I had seen, along with other information I felt was over the line. I politely refused, and got a classless response in return. Needless to say, I didn't follow through!
Either that or he has disappeared for a while with his tail betweeen his legs.
In any case, I'm not ready to take one for the team on this one!