Politics and Religion

Could the argument be made that hacking is free speech?
FatVern 2341 reads
posted
1 / 17
GaGambler 292 reads
posted
2 / 17

Of course the argument "could be made" but it would be an argument doomed from the start.

FatVern 181 reads
posted
3 / 17

It doesn't stop either side from making the argument, or fighting to the death.

 
You shouldn't make topics personal, it inhibits free speech.

JackDunphy 157 reads
posted
4 / 17

..it was decided today that you and xfean have been stripped of your constitutional right to free speech.

The only question left is will you two fight it or submit to the Court's decision and that of the vast majority of posters on this board. LOL

Sloc44 6 Reviews 163 reads
posted
5 / 17
marikod 1 Reviews 274 reads
posted
6 / 17

Hacked a web site that is a public forum and left some message of public interest. Just as Sheldon A. Cannot stop protestors from protesting his no union policy in front of the venetian, even though he owns the sidewalk,  a public forum web site would face the same objection if they refused say to allow the kkk to post but the kkk hacked them and posted anyway. Hacking private email or hacking without expression would not be protected.

WickedBrut 27 Reviews 228 reads
posted
7 / 17

What the government can Constitutionally do differs from what private citizens are bound by. So to start, protesters do trespass on private property sometimes, and generally they are subject to arrest and charges. So can they do that? Can you rob a bank? Yes in both cases. But you might get arrested and go to jail. Is that worth it? Maybe. Your call.

So the relevant question of privacy is like, if I look out at window at people walking down the street the same as someone looking through my window at me? Is a peeping Tom given the "right" to look into other people's homes because those people assume the right to look out of their window at people who are out in public? My opinion is no. A peeping Tom is in violation of rights of privacy if he looks through the window into a person's home, but the homeowner can look out the same window at people on the outside without violating their rights of privacy. Same with hacking into someone's computer.

JakeFromStateFarm 237 reads
posted
8 / 17

Any banning of FatVern by SCOTUS must be balanced by banning Taffy.  FatVern at least provides humor -- even if unintentional by him.  Taffy provides no humor at all, unless negative humor counts.

BigPapasan 3 Reviews 323 reads
posted
9 / 17

...on TER should be stripped because your posts just as stupid as xfean's or FatVern's.

1)  You say Americans who have a net worth of $50,000.00 are "richer than most."  
2)  You constantly advocate grinding hookers down on their rates because you're a cheap ass who wants to save a few bucks.  If you were "richer than most," you wouldn't care about grinding a hooker down.  But since you can't afford "rack rates,"  you try to grind down hookers that are out of your league rather than stick to streetwalkers or Backpage girls - the ones you actually can afford to see.

It all depends on your perspective as to who appears to be stupid, doesn't it?  

You don't know SHIT about the First Amendment.  First of all, the First Amendment was about governmental restrictions on free speech, not a private organization.  Second, it was designed to protect a minority of people's right to free speech.  You stupidly say that the "vast majority of posters on this board" should have the right to decide who can and can't post.  I'm glad I don't live in the United States of JackDunphy because you don't know Jack.

-- Modified on 12/12/2016 4:35:36 PM

marikod 1 Reviews 236 reads
posted
10 / 17

Amendment. How dare you say jack knows even less. Stop putting false legal  information on the Board! After all, this board is where people come to get legal info and you are the only one we can count on to get it right.

But your assignment today is to look up the meaning of quip and then call 1-800-get-a-life.

Please.

JackDunphy 183 reads
posted
11 / 17

He is all butt hurt from yet ANOTHER argument he lost here.

Yes, he has hit troll status.

BigPapasan 3 Reviews 260 reads
posted
13 / 17
JackDunphy 182 reads
posted
15 / 17

Its that he doesn't KNOW there is a difference. And yes, he is obsessed with your financial status. He obsesses over many things and people.  

Creepy.

ed2000 31 Reviews 219 reads
posted
17 / 17

You should continue to post links to & comments on my previous discussions regarding wealth and Social Security. I'm sure there are still some people here that are not yet aware of your keen and compelling thoughts on the subject. It's very useful and important for everyone to get a clear and full picture of what you believe on this

Register Now!