Politics and Religion

What a hoot! Passing a law without any evidence for a need for it!teeth_smile
mattradd 40 Reviews 1485 reads
posted

It's all too apparent what this law is meant to do!  ;)

The only solution liberals and Democrats have to everything is to tack on a new law, add more rules and regulations.  I can't even add a half bathroom or deck in my back yard without going through a sea of red tape in my liberal town.   But that's more important than voter fraud- isn't it?

Please answer how many minorities you believe don't posess IDs? 50%, 60%? Liberals are racists who think of minorities as helpless sheep.

becuase afterall, righeous is their cause.

If it means shipping all of south america up here to vote for Dems by God they'll do it.


""In 1996, Sanchez changed parties and ran as a moderate Democrat in the 46th District against six-term Republican incumbent Bob Dornan. The bitterly fought race saw Sanchez charge that Dornan was out of touch with his constituency, especially after a distracting run for the 1996 Republican Presidential nomination. The 46th had always had a Democratic tilt, but became even more Democratic after the 1990 census when it received a considerably larger number of Hispanics than had previously been in the district. Sanchez won by 984 votes, and Dornan contested the election, alleging that many votes were cast by people who were not American citizens. A Congressional investigation found evidence that 624 votes were indeed cast by non-citizens. An additional 124 votes had already been thrown out by California officials. These votes were not enough to throw Sanchez's victory into doubt, so the investigation was halted and the outcome was upheld by a Republican-controlled Congress,[22] making Sanchez the first American of Mexican heritage to represent Orange County in Congress. Dornan continues to assert that illegal voter registration of non-citizens was decisive in Sanchez's victory. In consultation with the INS, the House committee identified as many as 4,700 questionable registration affidavits;[23] but the probe was dropped before these affidavits could be investigated. As Article I Section V of the Constitution of the United States provides that "Each House shall be the Judge of the Elections, Returns and Qualifications of its own Members" the investigation was without binding authority.[24]

""""A Congressional investigation found evidence that 624 votes were indeed cast by non-citizens. An additional 124 votes had already been thrown out by California officials."""""

http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/1998/02/13/cq/sanchez.html

Proof Of Illegal Voters Falls Short, Keeping Sanchez In House
By Jackie Koszczuk, CQ Staff Writer

The House is set to dismiss former GOP Rep. Robert K. Dornan's challenge to election results that forced him to give up his California seat to Democratic Rep. Loretta Sanchez, ending an acrimonious 13-month battle that many Republican leaders believe has hurt the party with Hispanic voters nationwide.

Sanchez took the seat from six-term incumbent Dornan in November 1996 by just 984 votes. Dornan claimed the election was stolen through rampant illegal voting by non-citizens.

Acting on a recommendation from a contested-election task force, the House Oversight Committee on Feb. 4 voted 8 to 1 to drop the investigation of Dornan's claims. The full House is likely to accept that verdict when the resolution is introduced sometime the week of Feb. 9.

Task force Chairman Vernon J. Ehlers, R-Mich., said investigators had found concrete evidence of 748 illegal votes by non-citizens, not enough to throw Sanchez's victory into doubt. He and other Republicans said the results nonetheless show that Dornan's challenge was not frivolous and that the GOP was not unfairly targeting Hispanic voters.

"The fact that we ended up with 748 illegal votes makes it clear his allegations had merit," Ehlers said.

Democrats have characterized the probe as a witch hunt, charging that Republicans sought to unfairly single out and intimidate Hispanic voters. Rep. Steny H. Hoyer of Maryland, the lone Democrat on the task force, said of the panel's recommendation, "It's never too late to do the right thing."

Sanchez celebrated surrounded by House Minority Leader Richard A. Gephardt, D-Mo., and cheering Democratic lawmakers and staff at a rally held just after the task force's decision. "I feel great," Sanchez said. "When you stand up and you fight for something and you know that you're right, justice can prevail."

Gephardt said: "Loretta won this election fair and square. There's never been a doubt in my mind."

Not Going Quietly
Dornan, who was present with his wife and daughter for the committee's decision, was as outspoken as ever. He asserted that he won the election, but that the panel was unable to prove it because its investigators were stonewalled by Sanchez, by the Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS), and by Hermandad Mexicana Nacional, a group that helped register Latinos in California but which was found by committee investigators to have registered large numbers of non-citizens.

"I won on election night," Dornan said. "In her heart of hearts, Loretta Sanchez knows that."

Dornan vowed he would stay active in politics, and he hinted that he might run for the Senate against California Democratic Sen. Barbara Boxer, whose term expires this year. He also intimated that either he or his son, Mark Dornan, would challenge Sanchez again this year.

"There will be a Dornan running for the 46th District," he said, but he asserted that he and his family had not decided which one of them it would be.

Dornan's aggressive personal style and the intensity with which he argued that he had been wronged eventually hurt his case. After he got into a heated argument about the matter with Rep. Robert Menendez, D-N.J., on the House floor in September, the House voted to strip him of his former member's floor privileges.

In explaining how the task force reached its conclusion, Ehlers said the panel began with a pool of 7,841 suspicious votes, culled from a comparison of California voting records with INS records. That number was whittled down as investigators weeded out individuals who either did not vote or who proved to be qualified to vote after all.

Eventually, Ehlers said, 624 illegal, non-citizen voters were identified, and they were added to the 124 voters that California officials had disqualified because of improperly delivered absentee ballots.

The continuing investigation had become politically treacherous for Republicans. Democrats kept up the pressure by introducing multiple resolutions on the House floor calling for an end to the probe. And they seized on the issue to court Hispanic voters, who are being avidly wooed by both parties out of deference to their growing electoral strength.
.......................................................................................................................................

So anyone who still says there isnt a problem either has chosen not to read this far (ignorance can be willful) or just think illegals should be allowed to vote.

nuguy46237 reads


the demmies always have made illegal votes count in their column.

You have to have an ID to buy ber & cigs.....but according the lefties there is no need to have ID to vote. This type of thinking is what is making this country NOT so great!

Florida has a voter fraud problem. It's a problem that happens at a rate of 0.0000004% of the time. Voter ID laws are estimated to keep nearly 20% away from the polls.

Man up and admit what you're doing. You support denying the right to vote to the poor, to senior citizens, and to minorities. Don't dance around your "voter fraud" excuses.

How many of these poor and disenfranchised don't have an ID?  .00004% maybe?  It's a lie that you use to prop up fraud.  Show a fucking ID like I had to when I took my kids to a waterpark last week.

Posted By: willywonka4u
Florida has a voter fraud problem. It's a problem that happens at a rate of 0.0000004% of the time. Voter ID laws are estimated to keep nearly 20% away from the polls.

Man up and admit what you're doing. You support denying the right to vote to the poor, to senior citizens, and to minorities. Don't dance around your "voter fraud" excuses.

Which was, the side defending the voter ID law has no evidence that the law is needed.

But, back to your issue about laws which are not needed, I'm against them, period.

The only solution liberals and Democrats have to everything is to tack on a new law, add more rules and regulations.  I can't even add a half bathroom or deck in my back yard without going through a sea of red tape in my liberal town.   But that's more important than voter fraud- isn't it?

Now your claim that only liberals enact needless laws, particularly when it comes to zoning, just try to do your half bathroom or deck in San Marino, or most cities in Orange County California, which is heavily Republican.

Focus, focus, focus. If you what to change topics, start your own thread!  ;)

DA_Flex202 reads

It just happens that law like this has been done by Republican lead state governments.  I don't thinks it's a coincidence...it about defeating Obama in Nov.  Dont believe me...listen below. Yea...conservatives are all about freedom.

Register Now!