Would the Repubscums admit their own Fact, unlikely
and just remember, Fungy is "one of yours" lol
The SPOTY competition is far from over, although I will admit Fungy is no longer the leader on this board, I doubt that he is even in second place, more like a tie for third with JCA/Pimples/FatVern.
Hadji and bigfatanddumb have overtaken the lead here on P&R, with bigfattie almost ready to lap the field, I think Fungy still has a shot at the overall title though, that one is still between him and Pimples
If you can answer three simple quesstions without going into "REPUBSCUM" talk, I iill put it to bed forever.
First, there are emergency plans to rescue US embassy people in every country in the world. Who gave the order not to send them, when was it given, and how approved it. Second, at some point Hillary got a call that one of her counselates was under attack. Who did she call and what did she do for the next 2 hours. Third, Hill told the parents of one victim that they would get the guy who made the video. When did she find out that the video wasn't the cause, and why did it take so long Since, everything has come ouut, you can easily document any answer with a reliable source, since you found one article already on the other side. Of course, your answer will be what does it matter aand I am a racist for asking. Both very good answers.
I mean, besides the fact he can't seem to write a coherent English sentence, even in a link. You are accusing Republicans of the wrong thing when you say they won't "admit their own Fact" (sic.). Why? Because this report came from a Republican-controlled committee, dummy!
What you can accuse them of is:
Releasing a report that reveals almost all of their conspiracy theories were wrong, and doing it on a Friday evening so fewer people might hear about it.
Oh, well, at least the Benghazi political football has had the air let out of it.
Gosh, I wonder if Faux News even covered the story. Perhaps someone can let us know?
Here's a link. Of course, it's from a "liberal" site, so it couldn't possibly be right
I guess all of those months of lies and fake facts on Benghazi terror attacks showed who was right!
This is why when they say fair and balance you turn the channel. The sad part is the families that lost love ones. They listen to Fox Fake news media and others lies with no facts all of these months! When proven wrong you give it less than 30 seconds? So I guess when you keep lying and are caught you run the other way.So what I care about is that they got the ring leader of this attack and charged this asshole!
Also it's clear why the GOP released this report on a Friday before the holiday. We all know if they were right about wrong doing, this report would have been released earlier in the week.This is a small part of their report and the link: When a two-year investigation by the Republican-controlled House Intelligence Committee has found that the CIA and the military acted properly in responding to the 2012 attack on a U.S. saying: In the immediate aftermath of the attack, intelligence about who carried it out and why was contradictory, the report found. That led Susan Rice, then U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, to inaccurately assert that the attack had evolved from a protest, when in fact there had been no protest. But it was intelligence analysts, not political appointees, who made the wrong call, the committee found. The report did not conclude that Rice or any other government official acted in bad faith or intentionally misled the American people. http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/393275/house-intel-investigation-benghazi-clears-administration-intelligence-community http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2014/10/14/benghazi-terror-attack-suspect-indicted-on-new-charges/
First, there are emergency plans to rescue US embassy people in every country in the world. Who gave the order not to send them, when was it given, and how approved it.
Second, at some point Hillary got a call that one of her counselates was under attack. Who did she call and what did she do for the next 2 hours.
Third, Hill told the parents of one victim that they would get the guy who made the video. When did she find out that the video wasn't the cause, and why did it take so long
Since, everything has come ouut, you can easily document any answer with a reliable source, since you found one article already on the other side.
Of course, your answer will be what does it matter aand I am a racist for asking.
Both very good answers.
All the reporting on the issue can be read on the homepage of Fox News. There is even link to the report itself. Given that Ed Henry was sitting in for Bret Baier, which airs at 6:00 P.M. and the report is likely to have been released very late afternoon, around the same time, it gives very little time to cover all the angles. I do expect to hear more about this in coming days.. Since, I watch Fox News and you don't, I will definitely let you know what kind of coverage it gets throughout the next week. This has been a developing news since Sept 2012, and is certainly not something akin to a Breaking News that warrants dropping everything and reporting it as soon as it comes.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/interactive/2014/11/21/house-report-on-benghazi-attack/ http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2014/11/22/leading-republican-wants-senate-to-join-house-probe-benghazi-attack/?intcmp=latestnews-- Modified on 11/22/2014 11:30:29 AM
ask your Republican Congressman and senator those questions. They are the ones conducted the investigation so they are better prepared to answer them.
Now, going back to Repubscum, the point is people like you doesn’t accept facts even when the investigation is conducted by your own party.First, there are emergency plans to rescue US embassy people in every country in the world. Who gave the order not to send them, when was it given, and how approved it.
Second, at some point Hillary got a call that one of her counselates was under attack. Who did she call and what did she do for the next 2 hours.
Third, Hill told the parents of one victim that they would get the guy who made the video. When did she find out that the video wasn't the cause, and why did it take so long
Since, everything has come ouut, you can easily document any answer with a reliable source, since you found one article already on the other side.
Of course, your answer will be what does it matter aand I am a racist for asking.
Both very good answers.
Watching Faux News does that to you.
I give you credit for admitting you have problem with facts and your facts are based Faux Paux Channel.Liberals were not the one’s all over media crying Benghazi wrong doing you dis shit. Did Liberals release the report? No, Repubscums did. Complain to them moron.
You too piece shit Fumbler
What you can accuse them of is:
Releasing a report that reveals almost all of their conspiracy theories were wrong, and doing it on a Friday evening so fewer people might hear about it.
Oh, well, at least the Benghazi political football has had the air let out of it.
Gosh, I wonder if Faux News even covered the story. Perhaps someone can let us know?
You know what.. I'm sure the liberals are as proud to have you as conservatives are to have Sarah Palin...
-- Modified on 11/22/2014 11:47:00 AM
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/interactive/2014/11/21/house-report-on-benghazi-attack/
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2014/11/22/leading-republican-wants-senate-to-join-house-probe-benghazi-attack/?intcmp=latestnews
-- Modified on 11/22/2014 11:30:29 AM
Nothing you say answers any question. You address things I wasn't talking about. I was not asking who said it was a video, so your answers miss the point
Keeping it simple, you say the scum bag was caught. That may be true, but the questions I ask remain. Again. Keeping it simple - There are contingency plans for every emergency, including rescue options. Some one said, "Do not send help." Who made that decision? Likewise, Hillary got a call saying the staff was under fire. Did she just say, "Okay. Call me later." If not, what did she do for the next two hours. Now, focus. Can you answer those questions. Yes, the scum bag was caught, but that doesn't answer what I askeddI can't ask the GOP scumbags. They were not there when the decisions were made. They have been asking, but they never were given answers to these questions.
In any event, it is the person who made the decision that can explain. Not the investagators
Dang you anonymousfun! You beat me to the punch! 
Since your swiss cheese mind continues to leak, I'll always be here to remind you!!!!
So here's 56,000 dead Americans your Dummycrappers can wear around their neck. 1964 incident[edit]Main article: Gulf of Tonkin incident
On 2 August 1964, United States President Lyndon B. Johnson falsely claimed that North Vietnamese forces had twice attacked American destroyers in the Gulf of Tonkin.[1] Known today as the Gulf of Tonkin Incident, this event spawned the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution of 7 August 1964, ultimately leading to open war between North Vietnam and the United States. It furthermore foreshadowed the major escalation of the Vietnam War in South Vietnam, which began with the landing of US regular combat troops at Da Nang in 1965.
-- Modified on 11/22/2014 10:05:19 AM
-- Modified on 11/22/2014 10:15:05 AM
Seems like they didn't learn the lesson of the Gulf of Tonkin and the Viet Nam war. Since I served in the Viet Nam war, I do remember.
No one ever said there was any wrongdoing on the part of the CIA or military. The wrongdoing is 100% on the part of the Regime and it is undeniable that the incompetence that allowed the attack to happen would have further hindered Obama's already weak chances of re-election. Further, it is a loud and clear demonstration of the lies that the Regime will tell, and the corruption they will employ to keep something covered up.
I say, shout this great news from the roof tops. Make sure all of the low-info voters that make up the Democrat base all hear about this. I guarantee you their reaction will be "What's Benghazi? Isn't that a video?".You are a fool to stay so loyal. They would throw you to the wolves without a second thought.
It says they did NOT fortify the consulate well enough. The reason is they blew off numerous requests for additional forces from the people who were later murdered that night.
Maybe Dems here think it's good not to send enough troops that lead to the deaths of Americans, on 9/11, with Al Queda present, in a terrorist hotbed like Libya? Hmmmmm....yeah nothing to see here. We now know Panetta told Obama the night of the attacks it was by terrorists, not some spur of the moment stick and stone throwing bullshit over some video. What did Obama do when he heard the news? Did he call any of our allies or did he send in backups to help repel the attack? He had no idea how long the attack would last so what did he do? He won't tell us and that is why this this Intel panel couldn't comment on it. Hmmmmmm...... Why did Obama go to the floor of the UN two whole weeks later and still blame it on a "spontaneous uprising" when he knew fact certain at that point it was a planned, premeditated assault with mortars and rpg's? He won't tell us why he lied. Hmmmmm...indeed. Those are my questions and should be those of anybody who cares about our country. Obama never let anyone ask these questions or refused to answer them nor did he let anyone else in his command answer them so all of these panels can only go by what info they are given. We now know the president of the United States has lied to the American people on a number of subjects. Is Benghazi one of them? He won't comment or respond to critical questions. How convenientI was too busy fielding comments of the knuckleheads (minus inicky, of course)
I say, shout this great news from the roof tops. Make sure all of the low-info voters that make up the Democrat base all hear about this. I guarantee you their reaction will be "What's Benghazi? Isn't that a video?".
I'll give him credit there. And also look at what Matt is actually saying. He isn't saying the Obama scandals are NOT scandals, just that they don't rise to the level of his hand picked scandals over decades.
Maybe Dems here think it's good not to send enough troops that lead to the deaths of Americans, on 9/11, with Al Queda present, in a terrorist hotbed like Libya? Hmmmmm....yeah nothing to see here.
We now know Panetta told Obama the night of the attacks it was by terrorists, not some spur of the moment stick and stone throwing bullshit over some video. What did Obama do when he heard the news? Did he call any of our allies or did he send in backups to help repel the attack? He had no idea how long the attack would last so what did he do? He won't tell us and that is why this this Intel panel couldn't comment on it. Hmmmmmm......
Why did Obama go to the floor of the UN two whole weeks later and still blame it on a "spontaneous uprising" when he knew fact certain at that point it was a planned, premeditated assault with mortars and rpg's? He won't tell us why he lied.
Hmmmmm...indeed.
Those are my questions and should be those of anybody who cares about our country. Obama never let anyone ask these questions or refused to answer them nor did he let anyone else in his command answer them so all of these panels can only go by what info they are given.
We now know the president of the United States has lied to the American people on a number of subjects. Is Benghazi one of them? He won't comment or respond to critical questions.
How convenient.
They bury the real news in the article and blow everything off with the headline. The CIA or the military were not at question as you state. Why Time focused on that is laughable.
This was about why no one bothered to protect the lives of people who went into a terrorist red hot zone for love of country, the spin and deception that followed and the stonewall that was put up so anyone really involved couldn't testify under oath. "What difference does it make?" To Obama and Hils, it makes no difference at all why people were killed because that would make them look inward for fk ups and answers. It's just easier to say people showed up with mortars b/c someone played a video. Lol.
Maybe Dems here think it's good not to send enough troops that lead to the deaths of Americans, on 9/11, with Al Queda present, in a terrorist hotbed like Libya? Hmmmmm....yeah nothing to see here.
We now know Panetta told Obama the night of the attacks it was by terrorists, not some spur of the moment stick and stone throwing bullshit over some video. What did Obama do when he heard the news? Did he call any of our allies or did he send in backups to help repel the attack? He had no idea how long the attack would last so what did he do? He won't tell us and that is why this this Intel panel couldn't comment on it. Hmmmmmm......
Why did Obama go to the floor of the UN two whole weeks later and still blame it on a "spontaneous uprising" when he knew fact certain at that point it was a planned, premeditated assault with mortars and rpg's? He won't tell us why he lied.
Hmmmmm...indeed.
Those are my questions and should be those of anybody who cares about our country. Obama never let anyone ask these questions or refused to answer them nor did he let anyone else in his command answer them so all of these panels can only go by what info they are given.
We now know the president of the United States has lied to the American people on a number of subjects. Is Benghazi one of them? He won't comment or respond to critical questions.
How convenient.
He is capable of making a cogent argument to back up his politics, even if I disagree with him most of the time.
You bring dick. No arguments, no thought out rebuttals, just ad hominems on virtually every post. My guess is there is somewhat of an intelligent person behind AF and it would be cool if you brought something to the party other than "dumbfuck" and "republiscum." Try it AF. You might like it.
I say, shout this great news from the roof tops. Make sure all of the low-info voters that make up the Democrat base all hear about this. I guarantee you their reaction will be "What's Benghazi? Isn't that a video?".
The GOP control of congress will be short lived and they still have to get their bills pass by the President
You bring dick. No arguments, no thought out rebuttals, just ad hominems on virtually every post.
My guess is there is somewhat of an intelligent person behind AF and it would be cool if you brought something to the party other than "dumbfuck" and "republiscum." Try it AF. You might like it.
Let's compare the lists of administration officials, who have been charged and convicted of crimes, between Reagan and Obama!
I do watch Fox News occasionally. There is some actual news there, at least when Hannity and other idiots aren't bloviating their manufactured bullshit. And if you're right, why did other news channels give it more coverage? Basically, Faux News is run by Roger Ailes as the propaganda wing of the Republican Party.
But do please keep me up to date on their coverage of this.
And you know damn well, Fungy was never "one of mine."
Also, your retort is unintelligible. Did you even read my post? Moron.
I've never voted Republican in my life, and I think you deserve a SPOTY. There are as many stupid liberals as there are stupid Republicans.
And I get pissed off at stupid liberals like you at least as much as I do at stupid Republicans. Because I don't want my views represented by fools like you. You make me embarrassed to be a Democrat. Kind of like the late, unlamented Laffy. But at least he didn't write like a 15-year-old.
Thanks for informing me.. I will definitely keep you abreast on the coverage this report gets.
Trust me when I say I will.. You will see a post from me next Saturday summarizing if it gets any coverage from Monday - Friday or not..I used to check in here every once in a while. But idiots like you and fungus make it painful. Very painful.
Next thing you know you will be posting "the truth is out there - but that isn't it in response to Mein's posts.
At least spell it right - the are only 2 "m" s in a proper hmm.
1) Depending on the show, it is sometimes real news and a more interesting story that what's on the other all-news channels.
2) I like to know what right-wing idiots are "thinking." It's a form of opposition research.
Between my sports and news, I simply don't have time to turn to MSNBC to see what those idiots are "thinking"..
How does this justify going in front of the cameras and blatantly lying to the American people that it was the video that caused the attack? Hussein lied 6 times himself and Susan Rice went on 5 TV programs to lie about the attacks..What about that angle? You guys are wetting your pants as if something came out that exonerated Hussein of not lying to the American people.
That was something that has bothered me from day 1 as much as what CIA's involvement was.-- Modified on 11/22/2014 7:33:54 PM
I believe the managements of both channels made a conscious decision to slant their news, but in opposite directions. CNN on the other hand, appears to have made a conscious decision to be boring.
That's why he dwells in this cesspool, having been run off the General Board for his abject stupidity. And it looks like he's not doing too well here either.
As for Mein, where the hell has he been? All hell is breaking loose and he is mum. Lol.
Haven't seen your thoughts on the EO. You down with the cause or do you think it was either unconstitional or just too soon?I have pointed out the numerous scandals MSNBC have been involved in and having Sharpton on the air is fking disgrace, I think you may agree with, but more importantly, FOX, from day one, makes it a point to share the liberal views on every major issue, on every single day, in every single show (that I am aware).
They actually pay dozens of liberals to give their opinion and bring on guest makers they don't pay to get their liberal views out as well. I can say virtually the same thing for CNN, although they tilt Left. Can you honestly say that about MSNBC?Merely posted an investigative report.
inidick wants to argue with himyselfCNN and Fox News, but the thing that baffles me about CNN is that once they find a story, they will get obsessed with it like Tidwell is obsessed with poor Courtney...lol.. Are they still looking for the disappeared Malaysian flight?.LMAO.. I do still like the way they immerse themselves in the story, but I am of the opinion that they take it a bit too far..
What we, the conservatives, really need is another competitor to Fox News.like all other Repubscums.
Hey at least you admitted. +1 on that, Curled Faux braibefore long disappearance by one of your own
Read before commenting!So at least you pick a side when voting nicky46.
Also nobody cares if you are pissed off. We debate in different ways. If you want to cry some more go look somewhere else! Just what I need another weak ass liberal!And I get pissed off at stupid liberals like you at least as much as I do at stupid Republicans. Because I don't want my views represented by fools like you. You make me embarrassed to be a Democrat. Kind of like the late, unlamented Laffy. But at least he didn't write like a 15-year-old.
-- Modified on 11/22/2014 6:09:20 PM
First of all, I hardly ever watch MSNBC. But when I have, yes, there have been plenty of times when they had a right wing point of view represented.
I would agree CNN tilts left, though.
For a while they were The Ebola Channel. At times they become The Ferguson Channel. And so on.
That was something that has bothered me from day 1 as much as what CIA's involvement was. -- Modified on 11/22/2014 7:33:54 PM
You debate with weak-assed, juvenile, name-calling. And you are so bad at it you are a laughing stock even to your fellow lefties. And you are also so pitifully stupid you don't even know you've just had the crap kicked out of you.
PS: Who cares what you need. You are the one with the weak, pitiful game.
By the way, if you're so tough, why are you afraid to come back on the General Board? Still licking your many wounds, fatboy?
Martha McCallum
Nicole Petalidis [sic?]Different times in the same time zone!!!
I still think that's the stupidest thing you've said so far!!I see you feel tough old ladyboy.
So you had a date with your boyfriend tonight? Lol The sad part is seeing a weak ass liberal fraud like youself kissing the GOP ass.PS: Who cares what you need. You are the one with the weak, pitiful game.
By the way, if you're so tough, why are you afraid to come back on the General Board? Still licking your many wounds, fatboy?
I still think that's the stupidest thing you've said so far!!
And too big a pussy to answer the question I've now asked twice: why are you afraid to post again on the General Board, weakling?
Believe me, i've seen it in spades on the General Board. His idiocy there caused everyone to pile on his lame ass until he fled, screaming in pain with his hair on fire. He hasn't been seen since. He's an ignorant windbag and pussy.
In addition to the lovely Ms. MacCallum, let's put Sandra Smith (looks like an incredible fuck), Megyn Kelly (hot and smart), Harris Faulkner (an ebony MILF for sure) and Kirsten Powers on the list. Also, Kennedy. She may not be as hot as the others but her manner and demeanor says "i'm a fucking great piece of ass" whenever she talks on Outnumbered or the Independents.
Also when I post again on the General Board is up to me old man not you.
I guess you feel lost without your clown posse. Lol
I understand. Why would you want to suffer more abuse when last time you left sobbing like a.....
Truth is, you had not a single supporter on the GD board for your totally lame, stupid and gameless posts. You made a fool of yourself, were ridiculed by everyone and not one single poster sided with you. Now you come here and simply lie about it. What a shock.
No wonder your fat, gutless ass is afraid to come back.
Pussy.
-- Modified on 11/22/2014 10:58:44 PM
I understand nicky46 your old ass is lonely now since your date is over with your boyfriend.
So I am into woman and not men ladyboy. Some of you guys on here really must love men instead of woman. Since you worry so much about what other guys are doing instead of the woman on here. Lol Also your weak old ass won't have to worry ladyboy. I have been posting on the General board along with other area boards on TER. If you think I am running then maybe you should check yourself into a mental hospital to make sure your mind is still right!Gowdy is a cool player and so is the play that's going to go down.
They have total control now and will play hand later down the road when it will be nice and fresh in voter's minds .Benghazi ain't going away . How many fucking times do you left cowards need to be told that . She still gets off better than our four diplomats did. She's only going to lose a shot at being POTUS . They were abandoned , raped and murdered .
I can barely bother to spend time here and Conan couldn't care less about this place. So feel free to butcher the language to your heart's content.
His next post on this thread will make it an even 20. What a total tool, who just can't STFU.
TSTTT!
Please make bigguy30 go away.
Well, I'll add one more. That Taneros chick. Every time i see her I can't but thinking she's got some big firm man mades with pointy erasers on them and she loves to have them tweaked!
You make it sound like I have not posted on the GD board in months!
So old fool it's been only twelve days until today. I will say this again since you are old and slow. We are allow to post comments in different cites and boards on here. This is what I have been doing and I guess your sensitive ass is upset. If your insecure ass cannot handle it too bad. I don't need to run for help like your weak old ass! LolNo wonder your fat, gutless ass is afraid to come back.
Pussy. -- Modified on 11/22/2014 10:58:44 PM
-- Modified on 11/22/2014 9:00:45 PM
It's bad enough that just like Birdbrain before him, no one here can have a civil (yes they do happen here, albeit rarely) conversation without him screaming like a little kid, demanding that we pay attention to him.
Is that what you really want for the GD board?
He really is TSTTT (Too Stupid To Talk To), so at a certain point I just post a TSTTT note and leave (see below). It's also a good plan to "talk about him but not to him." He craves attention and may reply but you can just ignore that and drive bigclown nuts.
He'll probably comment on this anyway, as he seems to be a masochist who craves abuse.
I really think he's about 15, based on the way he writes. I think he comes here because his classmates tease him and he has no friends.
I'm considering starting a group called Liberals Ignoring BigGay (LIB). In fact, we will probably accept applications from Conservatives as well.
"We are allow (sic.) to post comments in different cities and boards here."
He couldn't wrap his tiny mind around the idea that I was trying to get him to post on the GD board, not tell him to stay away. What a fool our biggay is.
TSTTT.
Although I won't go so far as to say that Fox News is exactly "fair and balanced" MSNBC goes much, much further than Fox in giving the left wing version,
I think if I were to grade CNN, Fox, and MSNBC on "degrees from center" it would be something like Fox twenty degrees right, CNN 15 degrees left, and MSNBC 45 degrees left. I think CNN leans almost as far left as Fox does right, but MSNBC doesn't even try to appear objective. Trying to legitimize Al Fucking Sharpton is proof positive of that, He doesn't have the best reputation among your "tribe" of people either. Can you imagine the uproar if Fox were to have someone as anti semitic as Al Sharpton on their network?
Criticism and Lie.
If the Rpeubscums were criticizing it is fine but they are not. Take your diatribe about immigration for example. There was not any fact whatsoever. All of it was opinions and the rest were lies. Immigration issue is studied in depth and the contribution immigration makes to the economy is also studied in depth. Any and all criticism based on the findings (other than all studies are biased and all statistics are lies) would be welcome by all. On the other hand, issuing immigration order is illegal, unconstitutional, Obama is acting like a king, he is POS, etc., are nothing but lies. Not that your pea brain is able comprehend any of this. Bringing your beloved SPOTY when you don’t agree with someone is an exhibition of your stupidity over and over again like you, curdy, gagger,and insicky.Appointed by them to find the smoking gun
But that was not my point, which was to bait him into posting there. And it worked. He is my new puppet girl. LMAO!
-- Modified on 11/23/2014 12:14:59 PM
This is what happens when you are old and want to be a asshole. Lol
He couldn't wrap his tiny mind around the idea that I was trying to get him to post on the GD board, not tell him to stay away. What a fool our biggay is.
TSTTT.
he talks game but he's really just another freeloader .
-- Modified on 11/23/2014 11:09:16 AM
Is that what you really want for the GD board?
TSTTT!
You and he have a set of "facts" that drive how you see the world and these networks' coverage of events. My "facts" are different. These differences generally can't be debated because both sides are fixed in terms of what they see as reality. So, in my world, Fox is 75 degrees right, CNN is 20 degrees left and MSNBC is 50 degrees left.
I know you believe I'm as wrong as I believe you are. But there's no way to debate it.
And this is exactly why, with the exception of this thread, I almost never post here. It's a waste of my time and energy. "Sound and fury, signifying nothing."
-- Modified on 11/23/2014 3:54:43 PM
some hard working white donated their money for , Hilary will pay for Benghazi .
Sen. Graham has called the GOP led House report on Benghazi "crap" because:
"it did not find anyone in Obama Administration guilty". Was that the end game for the Repubs
-- Modified on 11/23/2014 10:22:49 AM
do you want to charge Hillary for a crime?
Rumor has it he got caught trying to stuff the 20 pounder and got pepper sprayed by an old lady!
"it did not find anyone in Obama Administration guilty". Was that the end game for the Repubs?
I was expecting a detailed dissertation on the law that the EO cited for it's foundation. Oh wait, they haven't published the EO yet so can't know for sure. Maybe you know the average time it's taken whitehouse.gov to post the texts of other EOs. It can't be all that difficult. It's not like it contains photographs or cartoons
I didn't find it in your link.
-- Modified on 11/23/2014 6:35:16 PM
You either misread my post or didn't read the link/watch the interview. I had no trouble finding his link. My question stands as is.
The CNN link and story page clearly quoted what he said about the report being garbage.
Since no one in the Obama administration was held responsible. You better read it again and I don't see how you missed his remarks! Then again I am not surprised either.My title was an example of the correct and fair use of quotation marks, although I am disappointed you are sinking into this behavior not yet seen between you and me.
I was simply pointing out the poster's obvious misuse of the quotation marks. Well to most people that studied the link it was probably obvious. . . see there, I can show that type of behavior too. I don't think it gained me anything though.because it was freezing his pod he started acting crazy and tipped the old lady off . I heard when she hit him with spray he fell down and the turkey shot across the floor. People in the crowd started chanting ; Fat Loser Flounder, Fat Loser Flounder , Fat Loser Flounder
So this GOP scum is on a witch hunt for his own polictical gain.
You are pointing out the other poster's misuse of quotation marks? I see you need to change the subject real fast ed2000! LolI was simply pointing out the poster's obvious misuse of the quotation marks.
Well to most people that studied the link it was probably obvious. . . see there, I can show that type of behavior too. I don't think it gained me anything though.
Ed is just politely telling you that you are full of shit and there is no use in having a thoughtful discussion with a rabid kool-aid drinker.
I think your whole point on thoughtful conversation is bullshit!
The whole GOP party arguments are built on mostly lies and made up facts!
This link is further proof of that point.
They even disagree with their own GOP house report.
Since no White house official was to blame is garbage?
Just stop it jrwayne! LOL
I think your whole point on thoughtful conversation is bullshit!
The whole GOP party arguments are built on mostly lies and made up facts! This link is further proof of that point. They even disagree with their own GOP house report. Since no White house official is to blame is a garbage report according to this GOP clown? Just stop it jrwayne! LOLveryone else has. That you are Too Stupid To Talk To.
Id recommend an office visit with Dr Kevorkian for you Flounder He can fix you!
Everyone else has. That you are Too Stupid To Talk To.
Id recommend an office visit with Dr Kevorkian for you Flounder
He can fix you!!
He have knocked that little fucker up and we'd have to support his offspring on welfare.
There is a big problem if people attempt to engage in debate based on misquotes creating facts not in evidence. I assumed that pointing out that the quote he posted was wrong would motivate him to reread/rewatch his own link and then make a correction. The crickets are still chirping on that one. You then picked up his mantle and proceeded to dig the hole even deeper.
My point was not an attempt at any diversion. There was a fundamental distortion created by the misquote regarding Graham's interview. Beyond the simple fact that he did not say what was attributed to him, he actually didn't say anything close to the quote. The quote states that Graham is upset because no one in the Obama administration was found guilty. That may or may not be true but nothing in the interview would to lead one to that exact conclusion. The quote implies (quite explicitly) that Graham wanted someone, or anyone in the Obama administration to be found responsible ("guilty" in desi73's terms) for something. What Graham DID state was that the House report was "crap" because it did not address what he considered to be an outright lie by an involved party. Graham went on to name the person, CIA Deputy Director Mike Morell. He continued to make his case with some specificity concerning the lie. Additionally, Morell is hardly a member of the Obama Administration. He is a life long CIA employee (since 1980, I'm estimating right out of college). He was the guy that produced the daily CIA briefing for President George W. Bush. Ultimately he did work for President Obama but he was not a member of his administration in the classic sense and certainly not a Whitehouse official. Having said all that, you and desi73 might be entirely correct in your assertions regarding Graham's desires, but there is nothing in Graham's statements to support your opinions.-- Modified on 11/24/2014 8:45:40 PM
My point was not an attempt at any diversion. There was a fundamental distortion created by the misquote regarding Graham's interview. Beyond the simple fact that he did not say what was attributed to him, he actually didn't say anything close to the quote. The quote states that Graham is upset because no one in the Obama administration was found guilty. That may or may not be true but nothing in the interview would to lead one to that exact conclusion. The quote implies (quite explicitly) that Graham wanted someone, or anyone in the Obama administration to be found responsible ("guilty" in desi73's terms) for something.
What Graham DID state was that the House report was "crap" because it did not address what he considered to be an outright lie by an involved party. Graham went on to name the person, CIA Deputy Director Mike Morell. He continued to make his case with some specificity concerning the lie. Additionally, Morell is hardly a member of the Obama Administration. He is a life long CIA employee (since 1980, I'm estimating right out of college). He was the guy that produced the daily CIA briefing for President George W. Bush. Ultimately he did work for President Obama but he was not a member of his administration in the classic sense and certainly not a Whitehouse official.
Having said all that, you and desi73 might be entirely correct in your assertions regarding Graham's desires, but there is nothing in Graham's statements to support your opinions. -- Modified on 11/24/2014 8:45:40 PM
accept this non-response response as acceptance of my position regarding Senator Graham's interview?
close to a record?
I'm guessing so, which is why I'm replying. Always wanted to be part of a record. And this is a little easier than joining-in on one of those record nudist group gathererings. And without the sunburn. Can you imagine a sunburned cock? Ouch.
Anyone read the book, "13 hours" ? tells the story of the guys that were actually there? if you don't believe them you are calling them liars.....
Transaction declined
Unfortunately it looks like your attempt to purchase VIP membership has failed due to your card being declined. Good news is that we have several other payment options that you could try.
We thank you for your purchase!
Membership should be activated shortly. You'll receive notification!