As I've said before I  believe Hillary will self destruct long before election day.
  If by rare circumstance I'm wrong, she won't stand a chance against Rubio.
   
 
   The only thing Hillary has going for her is name recognition. If not for  hanging on her husband's coat tails, she'd be an unknown liar.

 
"Democrats express concerns not only about whether Mr. Rubio, 43, a son of Cuban immigrants, will win over Hispanic voters, a growing and increasingly important slice of the electorate. They also worry that he would offer a sharp generational contrast to Mrs. Clinton, a fixture in American politics for nearly a quarter-century who will turn 69 before the election.

As her supporters recall, Barack Obama beat Mrs. Clinton for the nomination in the 2008 elections after drawing similar contrasts himself."
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/05/23/us/politics/prospect-of-hillary-clinton-marco-rubio-matchup-unnerves-democrats.html

 
"But less than half of likely Democratic primary voters -- 46 percent --are enthusiastic about her being their party's 2016 presidential nominee, according to the poll.

Another 38 percent of Democrats said they would be "satisfied" if Clinton is the nominee. Ten percent said they would be dissatisfied or upset.

"Enthusiasm is important," Field Poll Director Mark DiCamillo said. "It's what gets people to the polls. She needs to do some work.""

http://www.contracostatimes.com/breaking-news/ci_28169324/field-poll-hillary-clintons-support-dips-california-n

First, the Democrats are already enamored by her and will stick with her and just shrug off any issues as a war on women by those evil Republicans.

Second, she's been trained and practiced as a lawyer and knows how to double talk and deflect questions, (with all due respect to my Esq hobbyists) lol

And Republicans already can't stand her, but so what?  They weren't going to vote for her anyway.

I'm not a fan of Hillary, but it is what it is

As you know, my dear subjects, this last year for me has been an annus horribilus.   The Royal House of Clinton has been tormented by irresponsible questions about our handling of finances and subjected to tiresome questions throughout the furthest regions of my empire about tragic events that have taken place in the near-east, the mid-east, the far east, in Russia, in Northern Africa,  well, actually, throughout the entire world over the past six years.  And, sadly, even questions about my Royal e-mails and personal correspondence.

Nevertheless, I will not be daunted in my desire and commitment to serve you, the people, the workers, of my Queendom.   For the next seventeen months I will be chauffeured among you, traveling as one of you, to listen to your deepest longings and needs.   I will be with you in your Wal-Marts and beside you at your McDonald's and Burger Queens.   I will be with you on our busy interstate highways I helped build, seeing my lands, sharing with you your stories of poverty and needs.  

 How well I remember the days when the Duke of Arkansas and I were impoverished.   After we were expelled from our Washington Palace we hardly had two mansions to rub together.   We were so poor we had to remove thousands of dollars of china, flatware, carpets and gifts from the Washington Palace just to survive.    

 Now, happily, benefactors from my empire and around the world have given us just enough to scrape by.   During these difficult times we had to cut back when our daughter was married.   We only had three million dollars to spend on her wedding and I remember our hopes as she moved into her $10 million Manhattan apartment that, one day, she would be able to move from that humble abode, to something more fitting of her stature.    Maybe even into the Washington Palace like me ?      

 So, as I travel across my lands to meet you all, I will be listening and sharing with you.   Then when the time comes for the royal election and coronation, I know you will crown me as your rightful monarch so that we can all live happily ever after.     Well, at least I can.

 Thank you, and, as Mr. Spock said . . . live long and prosper.

because you have every right to your opinion.

My problem is that you have said the exact same thing -- almost word for word -- in other posts on this very page.  How many times do you have to repeat yourself???

Show some creativity for a change.  If that is even possible . . .

a few laughs or two with GaGambler via posts and PMs.  lol  

And I don't ever refer to Hillary Clinton or any of the other candidates by inappropriate names.  Unless I slip due to being in a big hurry, I refer to all of them by their proper names, i.e. Sec. Clinton, President Obama, Vice President Biden, Gov. Christie, Sec. Kerry, etc.  Whether I like the job they are doing or not, they still deserve the respect of being addressed by their proper titles.  

Everyone should do that. I know civility has gone the way of the buffalo, but it's not asking too much to respect our nation by using proper titles for our leaders

...are some recent examples of you NOT referring to Sec. Clinton as Sec. Clinton:

"Hillary will win in 2016..."
http://www.theeroticreview.com/discussion_boards/viewmsg.asp?MessageID=244958&boardID=39&page=1#244958

You referred to Sec. Clinton as "Hillary"  SIX TIMES in this one post (SIX TIMES!!!):
http://www.theeroticreview.com/discussion_boards/viewmsg.asp?MessageID=244967&boardID=39&page=1#244967

Here are a few older examples, before you ran away after your boy GOVERNOR Romney lost:

"Hillary":
http://www.theeroticreview.com/discussion_boards/viewmsg.asp?BoardID=39&SortBy=DateCreated%20desc&Search=hillary&SearchType=1&Author=pitchingwedge&DayFrom=3000&DayTo=0&MessageID=180944&frmSearch=1#180944

"Hillary":
http://www.theeroticreview.com/discussion_boards/viewmsg.asp?BoardID=39&SortBy=DateCreated%20desc&Search=hillary&SearchType=1&Author=pitchingwedge&DayFrom=3000&DayTo=0&MessageID=180943&frmSearch=1#180943

"Hillary":
http://www.theeroticreview.com/discussion_boards/viewmsg.asp?BoardID=39&SortBy=DateCreated%20desc&Search=hillary&SearchType=1&Author=pitchingwedge&DayFrom=3000&DayTo=0&MessageID=180939&frmSearch=1#180939

"Obama" (yeah, you sure respect the office, don't you?)
http://www.theeroticreview.com/discussion_boards/viewmsg.asp?BoardID=39&SortBy=DateCreated%20desc&Search=obama&SearchType=1&Author=pitchingwedge&DayFrom=3000&DayTo=0&MessageID=180731&frmSearch=1#180731

Did you slip SIX TIMES in one post?  Were you in a big hurry?  Doesn't Sec. Clinton deserve the respect of being addressed by her proper title?  Are you just another righty who's full of shit and expect to be believed just because you say so?  Will you apologize to Sec. Clinton for being disrespectful?  Will you apologize to the board for being a goddamn liar?  Until you do, you will have absolutely no credibility, Mr. Holier-Than-Thou!!  (See, I respect you - I called you "Mr.")




-- Modified on 5/24/2015 12:02:55 AM

If all you have is personal insults, the election is over!  It will be interesting to see the great things Madam President will do!

the Big Nitpicker!

Take another look at that laundry list of my old posts that you spent much of your weekend looking for.  In any one of them do I refer to the former First Lady, former Senator and former Secretary of State by an inappropriate name?  Not a single time.

Also, in several of them, I do call her either Senator or Secretary.  Some of the times that I refer to her as just Hillary it is in a second reference.

I can't help but laugh at your childish reaction.  It really made my Sunday.  So predictable yet so sad at the same time

Rubio is win over hispanic votes. May South Miami Cuban Hispanic vote. Rest of the hispanics hate Cubans with their holier than thou attitudes.

Hillary will make mince meat of Rubio and the rest in debates, guaranteed

He is talking about using disrespectful slurs like calling Hillary Clinton a “whore,” or referring to the president as a “liar.” Using a candidate’s first name or last name – “Hillary” or “Obama” - is not disrespectful.  Both are common uses in the main stream media.

          Using a candidate’s title is often appropriate in formal writing, or when addressing the candidate on TV.  Using the title on a hooker board, however,  is asking a bit much. But, as to his own posts which you dredged up, Pitching Wedge acknowledged he did not use titles when posting in a “hurry” which I’d say covers 90% of his posts. He doesn’t spend hours studying the Board like I do, and another poster I could mention.

       You were also wrong that championship boxing matches no longer go 15 round. In fact, I watched one last night that went 15 rounds, so they are still doing it. There was even a theme song and the guy got the girl at the end.

        Better up your game if you continue to aspire to the position of P & R Board ombudsman

PW is one of the most respectful posters on this board. Calling the Hildabeast "Hillary" is hardly disrespectful, not on a board where both of our last POTUS's where routinely called chimps, or the "idiot in charge", or any one of a thousand insulting names (many by me) for virtually every politician on either side of the aisle.

Disagree with PW's politics if you will, but calling him disrespectful just doesn't fly.

Calling me disrespectful is another matter, I will wear that label proudly, but then again, I never pretended to be a "nice" person.

W – T – F

Who the fuck is the BackStabber trying to fucking BullShit?
PW does not do any of what he accuses him of. The BackStabber sure has earned that title, and
Continues to prove it every day.

Now take me for example, I have no problem referring to Ms.Cunton as hilwhorie.
And I cannot wait to see what kind of shit hemorrhage the lefties will have when I start referring to her as a BullDyke.
We all know I also have no respect for the fuckup-in-chief, and several other dipwad lefties in office.

I find it really fucking funny that the BackStabber is busting a guy for what he calls disrespect when his good buddy lying arrogant fapping fraudulent yammerer is constantly calling righties names, but as I said he has earned the title BackStabber.

Thank You  
2015 = 28

Also he really must have no life at all to have the time to look up all those past posts

Irrespective of who the nominees are, we saw in 2000 and 2004 that the country is so polarized blue and red, it came down to one state.     In 2008 and 2012 President Obama eliminated that razor thin finish.    In both years the  media invented and created 'battle ground' or 'swing' states went solid blue.     In Florida the heavily populated Pinellas, Hillsborough, Orange, Miami Dade, Broward and Plam Beach counties went full Democratic and will contiue in 2016.     To say a Republican can win Florida is remote with over 95% Hispanics, Puerto Rican and younger generation Cubans voting Democrat in 2008 amd 2012.     Add to that the Orange man in US Congress sitting on a bipartisan Senate passed CIR bill fearing it will pass if he brings it up for a vote!.      Iowa anti immigrant Congressman Steve King will spoil any chances of Hispanics voting anything other than Democrat.     Did I forget the RNc chairman Rinse Mypenis did not include Univision for their debates.     Here is what I think will happen in 2016.

1. Heavy and solid Democrat NE from NH down to VA , PA, DC = 125 electoral votes
2. Midwest, MN, MI, IL, WI and OH = 74 electoral votes
3. Heavily Democrat NW,  OR, WA, CA, CO, NM = 87 electoral votes
4. FL , HI = 33 electoral votes

Democrat = 319 electoral votes

It is highly unlikely any of these states voting for any Republican as their candidate has to support these in order to get votes from their  base.    (Anti Healthcare, Anti LGBT, Anti Same sex marriage, Antil Minimum wage, Anti Birth control, Anti Abortion, anti union, anti paycheck fairness, anti equal pay, anti social security, anti medicare, anti medicaid, anti food stamps and who supports empoyers to dictate what type of health csare coverage they can give to their employees based on "employer's" religious beliefs! LOL).     Religious Freedom laws are killers and those who support will lose plentiful in  2016.    Add to this the Republican Governors who have implemented unaffordable tax cuts, run out of money and cutting funds to schools and universities.      LSU and University of Wisconsin are on the brink of declaring bankruptcy.     In Kansas schools are closing early as they have no money.    NJ has been downgraded at least 8 times by S&P and Moodys.

A Republican cannot complain about the economy.     It is improving without them as they have been busy repealing health care law, passing anti abortion laws, overriding DC religious non discrimination law and busy writing letters to Ayatollas in Iran and electing the Israeli PM.      An unemployment rate of 4% - 4.5% by next November will doom them on economy.

 
Montana to Texas = 89 electoral voates
Missouri to Louisiana = 24 electoral votes
Indiana to Georgia = 81 electoral votes
Alaska  = 3 electoral votes
Iowa = 6 electoral votes

Republican = 203 electoral votes

Let us keep all the lanes open on the George Washington Bridge so if anyone has anything to say, contradict or support what I have written can pass thru all the lanes of the Bridge, Expess and Local.

As for the right wing crybabies who only have personal attacks to write, get a life.    Your attacks on a guy like PitchingWedge shows your low and mean mentality, nothing of substance to show but lots of personal hatred towards a different point of view or conclusions on topics.

Find ONE rightwinger attacking PW, all the attacks on PW are coming from YOUR side of the aisle.

Now don't you FINALLY have a plane to catch?

your name calling of Sec. Clinton and President Obama is uncalled for.  Criticize them all you want for their actions -- many of us agree with your feelings on the ineffectiveness of their policies and their work in their respective roles as Secretary of State and President -- but calling them ridiculous and offensive names doesn't weaken them any nor strengthen any of your arguments.

I really wish that we could have some sensible and serious political discussion on this board.  Seems like all we get is name calling from both sides (Hil-whorie from one side, KKKlowns from the other are just a couple of examples) and chest-pounding over past elections.

This is supposed to be a discussion board.  Oh well, I've got other things to tend to right now.  I hope everyone enjoys their long weekend and remembers the reason why we have it

My uncle is getting honored this weekend for his service in WWII. I don't consider all veterans heroes. I for example am the furthest thing from a war hero although I did serve, but there are some genuine war heroes out there and in a large way we do owe our way of life to them, and they should get the respect they deserve from time to time.

...is what you said in your post:

"I refer to all of them by their proper names, i.e. Sec. Clinton, President Obama, Vice President Biden, Gov. Christie, Sec. Kerry, etc.  Whether I like the job they are doing or not, they still deserve the respect of being addressed by their proper titles."

You gave examples of "proper names" indicating "titles."  "Hillary is not a title.  Have you ever referred to anyone else by just their first name, Mr. Respectful?  Did you ever refer to Gov. Romney simply as "Mitt?'

Referring to someone by their first name reminds me of the old saying "familiarity breeds contempt."  You can gainsay it all you want, but by referring to Sec./Sen. Clinton by her first name, you are demonstrating your contempt for her because you are not being that familiar with other politicians.

BTW, your backpedaling from your previous post is worthy of Michael Jackson and his moonwalk.

-- Modified on 5/24/2015 9:30:50 PM

...the deuce did you deduce that?

Do you believe everything that everyone posts?  If PW says he slips when posting in a hurry, you take that as a fact?  Why, you probably even believe that YOU are a lawyer!  ROFL!

And how do you know how long PW or anyone else spends "studying" the board other than you, when you're not preparing for your big trials?

And, no, he isn't just talking about slurs.  He gave specific examples of how he addresses politicians by their titles, not simply their names.  It's not "asking a bit much" for him to do it on a fuckboard.  No one is asking him to do it; he does it out of respect - except for Sec./Sen. Clinton of course.

-- Modified on 5/24/2015 10:45:59 PM

Clearly you are a much more civil man than I and I respect you for that.

I agree that much of what I post is harsh, one reason I post what I post, when I have a little spare time, is I use the lefties on this board for entertainment. I post something sit back and watch them wet themselves, get all upset, excited, lose control, come unglued, poop their panties etc.

They take the bait every time. Kind of like Pavlov’s dogs, and I think I have the lefties here trained rather well. It is clear that I’m the leader and that I am in control, since they always fall for it.

Now I respect you and your civil respectful posts, and on rare occasion (ok very rare) I too make a civil post, however it is so much fun watching these little boys get in such a tizzy all the time.

Thank You  


-- Modified on 5/25/2015 10:45:56 AM

Who is defending/agreeing with him.

 
Thank you
2015 = 28

END OF MESSAGE

How he gets along with the likes of me is beyond me.

and gotten shitfaced drunk sitting at the same bar.  Fuck, who knows how we would get along then . . . .  

Hell, even with all the back-and-forth over the years on the board with guys -- whether the topic be politics or drama-filled chicks -- I think I could safely say that I would be willing to sit down and have a beer with just about anybody.  I say "just about" because I may have to reserve the right to draw the line somewhere … lol.  And no, I'm not talking about my old adversary willy . . . .

Bottom line is this.  Those of us on this board may have diametrically-opposing beliefs on political issues, policies and candidates but we all agree on one thing.  We all like good pussy!  Hell, some of us even like bad pussy . . . .  And no, GaG, I'm not necessarily referring to you with that last remark . . . .lol

Trannyboy, benlager and Senor Grumpy are a few that do come to mind however, and believe it or not, Senor Grumpy and I have met in person, but I wouldn't go out of my way to do it again.

Damn, I just realized that one of the "guys" I mentioned doesn't share our like for pussy, no wonder TrannyBoy was the first on my list. lol