Liberals (like Pri and, sometimes you) are never more sanctimonious than when denouncing “racism.” Yet the most explicitly racist organization imaginable-Planned Parenthood is given a free pass by the likes of you both when they set-up their "you rape 'em-we scrape 'em" clinics in black neighborhoods.

Half of the black children conceived in this country are aborted before reaching our world, and they are aborted at levels nearly three times their demographic representation.  

The left is fulfilling Margaret Sanger’s vision of systematically exterminating blacks, which is precisely what made her so attractive to the KKK in her own lifetime and to Democrats like Pelosi and Obama who are the modern champions of Sanger's racism in a disguised form.  Even stranger is the fact that Barack Obama, who garnered 95% of the black vote in 2008, has since wholeheartedly shown an unwholesome devotion to a practice that proves uniquely destructive to black Americans.

Who's the racist?

There is world of difference between "hate & disagree". One shuts the door and the other leaves the door cracked for debate. Of course, I am talking about normal people and not ideologues and wing nuts.

2nd class citizens?  

That would be an improvement over the current treatment women receive at the hands of abortionists, politicians, and "useful idiots" like you.  By their participation in this social system, women are now being treated as 3rd class citizens by the likes of you and other manginas like yourself.  Don't think for a moment that I (or anybody else) is falling for your half-assed attempt to march your starchy straw man through the discussion with that crap about drowning infant Indian girls. I supose that you will next bring up the analogy of bribing men to have vascectomies by rewarding them with a transistor radio (just like in India).

A least, this time you didn't come up with your usual "they aren't humans-they're only insensate fetusues" routine.  Your remarks along this line reveal a staggering amount of ignorance as regards the embryological development of humans ( a rather shocking trait in someone who claims to be a "science freak" like yourself).

I suppose that you are already passing familiar with the process of fertilization which produces a one-celled fertile egg containing genetic information from both the mother and the father.  That egg immediately undergoes a process of rapid cellular division until it forms a "syncytium," a multinuclear conglomeration of many cells, wherein the process of primitive cellular differentation has already occured. In other words, a syncytium has developed to the point that the character and purpose of each cell's potential function and morphology has been determined.  In the human, this process takes slightly less than two weeks post fertilization, to complete.

By this point, the syncythium has implanted itself into the wall of the uterus for 8-12 days and is on the way to its next phase of development.  By the third week, the rudiments of the heart and the central nervous system (CNS) have started to develop.  Because of the development of the CNS, the embryo is capable of feeling and will react to noxious stimulae.  By the 6th week, there is an audible heartbeat, ears, upper and lower limbs are able to be seen per ultrasonography.

Give or take a week, it is around this time that initial thoughts of "I'm late!" occur to the vast majority of women who participate in this process.  This reaction is either one of "Wow!  I'm late," and these are the women who continue trooping along until motherhood intervenes and the eventual pitter-patter of little footies is heard about the house, or the reaction is one of "Oh shit!! I'm late!" in which Roe v. Wade intervenes to produce another painful casualty being flushed down a clinic toilet.

You probably view abortion as a benign and humane way of providing women with a good choice at a difficult time.  May I ask, how many women do you know that have gone through with abortions?  Out of all the women in this category you might know, may I ask you how these women were effected by their decision?  For them was it as simple and emotionally painless as a bowel movement, or were these women reduced to emotional wreckage with long lasting or permanant effects?  May I ask what proportion were in each of those two categories?

Do you believe that inflicting the sort of emotional duress typical of post-abortion scenarios is what it takes to treat women like first-class citizens?

"black or white" topics. You are either for or against. I'll will state again the middle of the road view. And that is, I'm OK with Planned Parenthood. What I'm not OK with is federal funding, which is closer to $400M on a yearly basis. This $400M is about 1/3 of Planned Parenthood's operating funding.

Now all the Progressives on this board are going to ask why are you pro Planned Parenthood, but against federal funding. Two reasons, first although I agree with their mission statement (albeit long winded), it needs to be focused on income, those that truly need access for financial reasons. Second, their business model is flawed, but then who am I to expect a "not for profit" entity, or govt agency to be a tad bit more efficient or effective?

Planned Parenthood has over a 1000 locations. Almost as many as Chick-fil-a (lol). One third of their locations are in affluent areas or adjacent to universities. Why? Who the hell in affluent areas doesn't have access or can pay for their type of services? Re universities, who are they targeting? No doubt, thousands upon thousands of teen age girls, who hopefully will be long term customers. There is probably a very good chance these little girls have health care through their parents policy, or can basically get the same services at their fucking university. They all have student health services.

Planned Parenthood does good things. They just need to identify who their target demographic is, and focus on that demographic. They need to close some facilities, maybe open a few more in the inner city, learn how to better price their services, get more donations, and voila, they can get off the federal funding bandwagon, thereby eliminating a contentious debate between the left and the right.

-- Modified on 8/13/2012 3:53:10 PM