The data says Obama!
the follow data is not true because he's a liberal?
On the broader economic strategy, I think that Obama has the stronger case. We need a tax and regulatory structure that creates strong incentives for businesses to flourish. The thing is, we already have one. The World Economic Forum’s 2011-12 Global Competitiveness Report ranks the United States No. 5 — and first among large economies. There has been a little slippage in this ranking the past few years, but it is modest and can be rectified. Overall, however, whether compared with our own past — of, say, 30 years ago — or with other countries, the United States has become more business-friendly. That’s why, just last week, the Economist magazine predicted an American economic renaissance.
America is worse off than it was 30 years ago — in infrastructure, education and research. The country spends much less on infrastructure as a percentage of gross domestic product (GDP). By 2009, federal funding for research and development was half the share of GDP that it was in 1960. Even spending on education and training is lower as a percentage of the federal budget than it was during the 1980s.
The result is that we’re falling behind fast. In 2001, the World Economic Forum ranked U.S. infrastructure second in the world. In its latest report we were 24th. The United States spends only 2.4 percent of GDP on infrastructure, the Congressional Budget Office noted in 2010. Europe spends 5 percent; China, 9 percent. In the 1970s, America led the world in the number of college graduates; as of 2009, we were 14th among the countries tracked by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. Annual growth for research and development spending — private and public — was 5.8 percent between 1996 and 2007; in South Korea it was 9.6 percent; in Singapore, 14.5 percent; in China, 21.9 percent.
In other words, the great shift in the U.S. economy over the past 30 years has not been an increase in taxes and regulations but, rather, a decline in investment in human and physical capital. President Obama has real facts and a strong case — which makes it all the more depressing that his campaign has focused on half-truths and weak arguments.
Zakaria didn't sound like a liberal to me in that column.
Sounded very much like the typical "tax and spend" speech that liberals have made for years.
One reason for the lack of spending on infrastructure would clearly be all the money spent on entitlements in the last 10 years or so.
At the end of the day Obama will be reelected. That alone should make you and liberals extremely happy. But as long as you understand that during the next 4 years unemployment will continue to be north of 8%, more like 15% when you factor in all the variables, we will have another recession probably in 2013, debt will be $20T plus, and our general economic malaise will continue.
As long as you're happy with the above, then I'm happy. But please, in 2016 when we are doing this shit all over again, don't whine, bitch and complain about corporations, Wall Street, Bush, rich people, Kobe Bryant, and whatever else.