Who do you think is correct about the Mideast and the world?
The American President:http://www.politico.com/story/2016/01/state-of-the-union-foreign-policy-217675 or The Russian Prime Minister:
http://global.handelsblatt.com/edition/367/ressort/politics/article/russian-prime-minister-syria-could-trigger-world-war
One thing for sure, the stakes are high!! The link is to a new WaPo staff editorial that speaks for itself.
Obama is a complete and utter failure. He and Michelle are classless grifters. An affirmative action experiment gone terribly wrong. It'll be a year or two before the media stop carrying his water and his true ugly legacy will be clear for all to see. He'll go to his grave blaming Bush and nobody will be listening.
The American President:
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/01/state-of-the-union-foreign-policy-217675
or
The Russian Prime Minister:
http://global.handelsblatt.com/edition/367/ressort/politics/article/russian-prime-minister-syria-could-trigger-world-war
One thing for sure, the stakes are high!!
The link is to a new WaPo staff editorial that speaks for itself.
I hope you are joking because your comments are filled with utter garbage and hate.
The heart of the matter is the GOP uses language like this for two reasons.
They are a mess and have nothing but hate to offer.
We can also thank Fox Fake News too. Just remember ROMMEL and others like him never went to Lvy leagues schools or became a US Senator or President of the US. He sitting on a fuck site writing down racists comments and is showing his own insecurities. Also history will prove you clowns wrong about this President too!
The American President:
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/01/state-of-the-union-foreign-policy-217675
or
The Russian Prime Minister:
http://global.handelsblatt.com/edition/367/ressort/politics/article/russian-prime-minister-syria-could-trigger-world-war
One thing for sure, the stakes are high!!
The link is to a new WaPo staff editorial that speaks for itself.
that refuse to acknowledge that right.
So, why are you on a discussion board?
So, why are you on a discussion board?
The American President:
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/01/state-of-the-union-foreign-policy-217675
or
The Russian Prime Minister:
http://global.handelsblatt.com/edition/367/ressort/politics/article/russian-prime-minister-syria-could-trigger-world-war
One thing for sure, the stakes are high!!
The link is to a new WaPo staff editorial that speaks for itself.
Bill Clinton was the signature force behind the mass incarceration of Black people we see in prisons today.
By the way, the red neck racist Hillary was cheering Bill's closet hatred of Black people, along with his disrespectful attitude toward Cracker Barrel women.
Bill and Hillary remind me of the fat guy squealing like a pig in Deliverance.
I have a feeling Hillary's not going to find the support she believes she deserves, from the Black community in the South, other than uninformed voters like big guy.
The American President:
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/01/state-of-the-union-foreign-policy-217675
or
The Russian Prime Minister:
http://global.handelsblatt.com/edition/367/ressort/politics/article/russian-prime-minister-syria-could-trigger-world-war
One thing for sure, the stakes are high!!
The link is to a new WaPo staff editorial that speaks for itself.
Without affirmative action Obama would still be in the Choom Gang. You can infer racism and cry and get pissy but face the facts ---- if Obama were white you'd have never heard of him. Obama is a national embarrassment.
The heart of the matter is the GOP uses language like this for two reasons.
They are a mess and have nothing but hate to offer.
This is why they use race baiting to make their stupid supporters feel good about themselves, but the GOP keeps screwing them too!
When I read comments like this it shows the real reason why this country is in trouble!
We can also thank Fox Fake News too.
Just remember ROMMEL and others like him never went to Lvy leagues schools or became a US Senator or President of the US.
He sitting on a fuck site writing down racists comments and is showing his own insecurities.
Also history will prove you clowns wrong about this President too!
The American President:
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/01/state-of-the-union-foreign-policy-217675
or
The Russian Prime Minister:
http://global.handelsblatt.com/edition/367/ressort/politics/article/russian-prime-minister-syria-could-trigger-world-war
One thing for sure, the stakes are high!!
The link is to a new WaPo staff editorial that speaks for itself.
Quit constantly handing out reading assignments and speak for yourself.
The American President:
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/01/state-of-the-union-foreign-policy-217675
or
The Russian Prime Minister:
http://global.handelsblatt.com/edition/367/ressort/politics/article/russian-prime-minister-syria-could-trigger-world-war
One thing for sure, the stakes are high!!
The link is to a new WaPo staff editorial that speaks for itself.
The truth must be getting to you.
And he still has another year to go.
Detroit, show them a picture of Elizabeth Warren and ask them who it is. You'll be lucky if one even comes close to the right answer.
By the way, this is a "discussion board," not a "busting board."It's clear you just want to keep embrassing yourself.
Headline in Italian paper, Il Giornale.it "e Putin Beffa Obama..." the first line is "Dope aver scoippato al premio Nobel per la Pace. Google it on Google.it
It translates "Putin gets the better of [tricks] Obama." "After swindling the Nobel Peace Prize." In the past few months this is one of many articles that mock Obama as a chump. The bloom is off the ros
Obviously, you need to bone up on your history.
-- Modified on 2/12/2016 8:19:33 PM
...conservative? Is it the Italian equivalent of the NY Times or The National Enquirer? Isn't its circulation less than 175,000 (7th largest newspaper) in a country of 60,000,000? You're not trying to hide anything, are you phil? Consider the source, phil
He's not done. It will take years ,and sorely needed objectivity ,to access the tremendous damage Obama has done. Obama is the worst President in history.
...Obama has done, will it not also take years to determine if Obama is the "worst President in history?" Thanks Professor.
-- Modified on 2/13/2016 4:19:22 AM
& his knowledge of politics & history was as good as yours. Other worst Presidents : Andrew Johnson, Herbert Hoover, Richard Nixon , Jimmy Carter, Ronald Reagan & George W Bush. Bush left office with a 21% approval rating.
Rommel, a tip : bone up on your history & politics before engaging in a debate, you'll come off better.I am not agreeing with Europe as the gold standard. I go there frequently but never hold it up as something to follow. And I am not saying they are right or wrong. I am just reporting how they handle the issue
BUT THE RULES CHANGED ON THE LEFT. It is the left changed them. The left always says "Europe does.....Europe does...." Why cann't our health care...Why can't our penal system... In fact, when Europe hated Bush the left said, "Look how we are viewed in other countries." That is all I am saying now. That they realize he was a fraud. (See part about nobel prizeNow, magically, you're pointing at the press in other countries proclaiming, "See!!?? They agree with us Obama sucks! Ohhhh, the shame!!!"
It translates "Putin gets the better of [tricks] Obama." "After swindling the Nobel Peace Prize."
In the past few months this is one of many articles that mock Obama as a chump.
The bloom is off the rose
First, when ever a leftie posts an article here, do you automatically discret it because of the sourse, or is this a one sided thing? When an article is posted from the NYT, Salon, HuffPo, do you say, "Well can't take that seriously."
That said It Il Giornale is conservative, but there are a lot of buts In Europe papers are very clearly on one side, but that doesn't change the fact that previously none of the papers took this view. They don't hide their view and people take the for what they are worth. Because they are open, ironically they tend to be fairer, so as not to be dimissed out of hand. Second, "conservatives" in Europe are far more liberal than conservatives here. For example, no conservatives talk about undoing (or fixing) the medical system. (There are problems, but that is a red herring and beyond the scope of this post, so let's avoid it. I am just saying that "conservative" there is liberal here.) Likewise during the Sexual Assault rage recently ALL PAPERS withheld the news, liberal and conservative, for days, until social media broke the story.'None were "anti-immigrant," even though many people in Europe feel they are being invaded. THey did not take the "conservative" position that is comparable to here. Finally, even the comments that are anti-Obama are from the left, calling his a war monger. Does that answer your question?
perhaps it is because he is incapable of replying in a civil way using fact and/or reason.
But he does post links from other ignorant people. To rephrase an earlier comment, why is he on a "Discussion Board"? Does he know what "discussion" even mean?
Rommel, a tip : bone up on your history & politics before engaging in a debate, you'll come off better.
of anything but linking to non-sense sites and calling folks names
That should count for something, I'll let you decide what.
Commit a crime, go to jail. skin color is irrelevant except to the felon's apologists.
When 50% of murders are committed by 13% of the population you are going to see a lot of black faces in jail. Black lives don't seem to matter to Blacks. Like you, they just want to blame whitey while black young men die in Dem controlled inner cities. If you don't care, neither do I. When the carnage your team created and now ignores spills into the suburbs you will see real gun-control - hitting what you aim at. "Pants-up, don't loot". I guess that the thugs Trayvon Martin and Michael Brown have replaced Martin Luther King as the preeminent civil rights leaders.So calm down brooks5.
You can "discuss" it all you want.
You were wrong.
Period.
And instead of just saying that, you keep trying to move the goal posts.
who thank him for inviting the millions of Islamic barbarian migrants in to sexually assault their women
Except for a few times, like when bin Laden was killed, Obama has been unpopular (by that I mean more people disapprove than approve) for a long time.
RCP used to run the average of all polls on Obama Care and it never had majority support. It was constantly about 10% below
You can "discuss" it all you want.
You were wrong.
Period.
And instead of just saying that, you keep trying to move the goal posts.
... like a spineless pussy after Assad gassed his own people. The world no longer saw us as the Superpower with balls of steel,
and under Obama's flaccid foolish and appeasement oriented foreign policy, the world now sees America as being lead by an emasculated powder puff with marshmallows for testicles.