...until the next President is in office.

Do you think he knows any?

They're probably already having a meltdown/panic attack over this.

I cannot imagine this Republican led Senate allowing a vote on Obama's choice for SCOTUS. The GOP will not allow him to put his imprint on the Supreme court. This upcoming election will have consequences.

And I say good riddance to this odious bastard.

and has never done it.  In fact, most of the recent high-profile decisions -- even with the so-called conservative majority of 5-4 -- have gone in favor of the liberal viewpoint (gay marriage, Obamacare, etc.).

since he didn't have a heart.

-- Modified on 2/13/2016 4:24:49 PM

-- Modified on 2/13/2016 10:06:02 AM

and any other billionaires inclined to buy elections.

Horrors.

...the Republicans said they were doing when they chose Clarence Thomas to replace Thurgood Marshall.  No difference, right?

...many, many more cases on other important matters that could shape the course of this country for years to come.

...of the Constitution.  Then he held it up to his forehead like Carnac the Magnificent to divine the Founding Fathers' intent.  Of course, when righty justices do that it's okay; when lefties interpret the Constitution, righties call it "judicial activism."  Jack, show me where the First Amendment says that money = speech and that corporations are people

...for the U.S. Court of Appeals, the second highest court in the country, only 2 1/2 years ago.  Let's see the Republicans try to say he's not qualified for the Supreme Court or it will take a year to vet him.

They said one does not lose their first amendment rights by simply joining a group.  

Soprano.

The President should nominate whoever the hell he wants and say fuck you to the GOP animal house!
They don't have any rights telling the Executive branch anything and again the GOP are the problem in this country.
If they block the nomination they will lose not only the White House but the Senate too!

...Amendment again very carefully to see where it talks about corporations that own media outlets and corporations that do not.

...and he's chairman of the Sen. Judiciary Committee.  Let's see him say now that she's not qualified.

I'd bet Sinavasan, Millett, Watford or Jane Kelly will be the  names you'll be hearing as a replacement for Scalia...

...that it's a typical unconstitutional move by Obama to avoid "advice and consent" as set forth in the Constitution.  The only problem with that is that the last President to make a recess appointment to the Supreme Court was a Republican - Eisenhower - and he made THREE recess appointments to the Supreme Court.  So if righties complain about a recess appointment, they'll be hypocrites.  Gee, that would be something new for them, wouldn't it?

In Eisenhower's day, they still reached across the aisle like civilized people, not the monkey farm circle jerk we have today.

...give the Dems a reach-around - he made three recess appointments without seeking Senate approval.

take joy in the death of another human being.

but a stereotypical amoral lib

taking joy in the death of a human-being with whom they disagree - it shows why their ideology is as scary as Islamic extremism - they are just a baby (or fetus?) step away fro chopping off the heads of infidels/conservatives.  After they terrorize, torture and snuff you, they will celebrate.

Hillary is on the record as adamantly  anti gun.  
    Scalia has been  the deciding vote for gun rights advocates.
  Who knows until voters show up, how well  a gun grabber will fare in South Carolina.  
    If I had any money to invest I'd buy more Smith and Wesson stock.
 
Bernie might turn his NRA support into more votes from gun clingers than talking  
  heads can imagine.  

the fuckup-in-chief cannot appoint himself.

who should not be allowed to run for President.

you should hear all of the Cons who say they wish Obama was assassinated.

Can you imagine how high his life insurance premiums would have been if Hillary had been VP?