Constitution provide for pardons? The answer is that sometimes it is more important for the country to give someone who has broke the law a free pass than it is to prosecute or punish them.

         We don’t investigate/prosecute President Bush for torture, or President Obama for drone warfare, bc of the ramifications for future presidents. It doesn’t matter what the facts really are – we are not going to prosecute these guys bc they were acting for the good of the country, notwithstanding both exercised terrible judgment. Hillary put that server in her house to make things easier for her as Secretary of State.  

       No meaningful crime here. I say go after her all you want as long as she is a private citizen- but once she becomes President elect, let's not waste the country time on this silliness.  

        So your suggestion to “wait until the facts are in” for the President -elect begs the very question I raised-isn’t better that she spend time running the country than defending against such a technical charge that caused no harm to nobody? Take a look at how much Bill Clinton accomplished after the Monica Lewinski scandal broke. He could have taken bin Laden out but didn't

my values tell me that a felon as President isn't good

but dems can rationalize ANY behavior from those with whom they agree

mari's post is a great example showing libs have no values and character

whadya expect from folks who think infanticide is a human right, hiding the horror behind the benign word "choice"

their parent must be SO proud

liberals are vil

if Abedin lied she goes away

lying isn't based on intent, it is black and white

that's what they got Scooter Libby on

Apparently it is not necssary/required to prove "intent"

 
You're Welcom

That's ridiculous and corrupt on its face. Lets see what the evidence is and then go from here.

You seem to be saying lets give her a pass REGARDLESS of what she did. And how would that affect her presidency? Even the lib media would smell blood in the water as she wouldn't have any credibility to lead if peeps thought she only got off due to a pardon.

In case you haven't noticed this is an anti-insider, anti-establishment, year and him pardoning her would be the height of what dirty establishment types do for each and further evidence that the entire system is corrupt and God only knows what would happen then.

And I call bull shit on "Hillary put that server in her house to make things easier for her as Secretary of State."

She did it to dodge congressional oversight, and congress represents the people, and that is corrupt in and of itself.

.......Good luck with that line of thought. FWIW, the FBI announced yesterday that in their investigation so far, they have seen no reason to indict Hillary. The "powers that be" in our Government" have had their come to Jesus moment after Trump's stunning victory. IMHO, Hillary will NOT be indicted, it's just the way things roll in Washington.

a clinton spokesperson put that info out, so of course it is true...take it to the bank.

You know just like she keeps on saying the FBI is conducting a security review, not a criminal investigating.

 
Thank You
2016 = 28

 
On the subject of...... $80 for 30 .........baby wipes (in NYC) must be cheaper than I thought

It was all over cable news yesterday, except for Fox News of course. Ain't no malicious intent, ain't no indictment.

http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/fbi-probe-hasnt-found-intent-clinton-emails

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/federal-prosecutors-in-virginia-assisting-in-clinton-email-probe/2016/05/05/f0277faa-12f0-11e6-81b4-581a5c4c42df_story.html?tid=a_inl -- Modified on 5/6/2016 4:43:08 PM

fortunately for the rest of us it is not necessary or required to prove or show intent MALICIOUS or otherwise.

 
You're welcome
2016 = GOP All The Way

...........for peeing over and around your hopes and dreams of a Hillary lynching.

So don't even worry about them, we can really bash them in November.
When they are running like rats, when Trump loses in the GE.
It will be fun to see, who has the guts to post first. Lol
I bet anything it's won't be FM or DD, but maybe Quad will have some guts.  

-- Modified on 5/6/2016 3:14:32 PM

You sure are sorry.  

and your sorry attempt at diverting is more than pathetic, but that is OK we all know sad, sorry  and pathetic is all you are capable of.

You're Welcome

after the last 'beat-down' they took with Romney in 2012! Even up until the end they were like 'Turdblossom', who was certain Romney was winning in spite of all the evidence to the contrary!